394
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Gsus4@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

See, Apple? Even cars can do it :)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago

The answer is massive government support. The cost of those stations has to be insane...imagine the inventory holding cost of those batteries

[-] Kanda@reddthat.com 66 points 3 months ago

Imagine the cost of stations everywhere that would have tanker-trucks deliver fluid that you'd put in cars

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

Don't worry, the US government will support its automakers by banning the competition.

That is, if they make totally cool and totally legal campaign contributions.

Competing is for the working class, not the 1%.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 39 points 3 months ago

Ah so this is about swapping the battery on-the-go so you can get rid of your depleted one and get a freshly charged one within minutes.

That's actually pretty cool then!

Not quite sure how this relates to Apple though.

[-] Gsus4@programming.dev 34 points 3 months ago

It's a joke about how apple made their phone even thinner and the battery still isn't removable :P

[-] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don't oppose the idea of battery station, but who owns the battery then? When I bought the car, am I leasing the battery? How about used car?

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The company (NIO) owns them and you are leasing the batteries. The car is cheaper this way, as you don’t buy the battery up front, but pay a monthly fee (~200+ in Germany).

You have a fixed number of swaps per month, above that you have to pay extra.

Source: colleague uses a car like this and explained the details.

[-] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What if they EOL the battery and stops the leasing program? Now the perfectly fine car is non functional because it's missing a battery. If I replace it, I'm just contributing more waste, not in materal but energy. Is that the "green" future we all after?

[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'd assume you could still charge them the regular way. You'd just no longer get a fresh one, but that just puts you on par with the other EVs

[-] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

The ownership is still questionable. Even if that's the case, you're stuck with the battery you last swapped in, which you don't know the wear level or how long it will last.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] take6056@feddit.nl 14 points 3 months ago

It's been a while since I've watched it myself, but remember them going into the ownership structure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNZy603as5w

There's basically no way for them to not make it a subscription model.

[-] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 months ago

So I can give an example. Here in Taiwan, Gogoro has put up a lot of battery swap stations for their electric scooters. When you buy the scooter, it comes with removable batteries which you can charge on your own. Or, you can buy a monthly subscription on top of it that gives you access to those battery stations, where you can ride up to one and swap a pair of freshly charged batteries into your scooter. Subscription price is tiered by Ah per month, if you go over the limit you pay extra per Ah.

In this case, yes I think Gogoro is in charge of maintaining/replacing old batteries. Subscription is separate from the scooter cost, so buying used should not affect your ability to subscribe to the plan.

[-] Gsus4@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago

I love that system

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

I guess it would either work like a subscription fee or a one time fee per swap

[-] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

Subscription for my car? Don't we have too much subscriptions already?

And neither solve the ownship problem, and a tons of other problems.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You pay a monthly fee (lease) that contains a certain number of swaps per month, above which you pay extra. The car is also cheaper this way, as you are not paying the full price of the the battery up front

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

No, you're paying over and over for the battery.

[-] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 months ago

Sort of like how you pay over and over for gas, without which your car doesn't work?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tankplanker@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Renault tried leasing the batteries in EV in an effort to lower the initial cost of the car while increasing their tail for future owners. They abandoned it only a few years in as it was a disaster for their used market that got worse the older the car got as nobody wanted the ongoing cost. Only the initial owner saved money, and only if they managed to use PCP finance with a balloon set before Renault realised that the battery leased cars would be worth significantly less.

Renault also did not like that with older cars they would be liable for the battery replacement far sooner than they planned as they (initially) had a higher percentage unusable before they had to do a free replacement vs. a normal battery warranty, made worse as a leased battery has a warranty as long as you are paying the lease.

Renault could repossess the car if you stopped paying the battery lease and refused to buy it out. Its like any car finance that puts a lien or similar on the car, you do not own it till its gone.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Username@feddit.de 7 points 3 months ago

I would guess a swappable battery would be separated from the vehicle, similar to a gas bottle for a grill.

The battery would be rented for a small deposit and on swapping you only pay the energy + service fee.

I guess you could also buy one to own, but then could not swap that.

That's how it would make sense, at least.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

It's not just that, its what happens if you get a battery from a guy named roger who said he knows what he's doing and fucked with it?

Battery swapping sounds great, until you put it into a real world scenario.

[-] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Battery swapping sounds great, until you put it into a real world scenario.

Government regulation and standardization is the answer.

You know, like fossil fuels also are. For example fuelpumps have to be legally calibrated so that they measure accurately, and there are a myriad of quality standards and ratings regarding what 98 octane or 95 octane or diesel fuel or whatever can contain.

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

When 52% of all trips made are less than 3 miles and less than 2% are over fifty miles, I don't think battery swapping is something any individual needs on a regular basis.

I could get on board if manufacturers were making $10,000 sub 50 mile vehicles that were compatible with a swap station so you could switch to a larger battery for the weekend. This would have to be a standard adopted by all however, and even before that, they'd have to make small cars. Which they won't, because we all know they are too busy making trucks and SUVs.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 3 months ago

The whole "but what about the one journey a year you make that's outside the normal battery range?" is such an obvious fossil fuel industry boondoggle. It's up there with "but what about that one time you had to move a fridge?" when convincing people that a Ford F150 is a normal sized family car.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 months ago

Do people even need a car for a 3 miles trip? You can cover that on a bike in 15-20 mins at a chill pace... Also, 28% of trips are less than a mile? People can't walk a mile?

[-] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Not speaking for other places, but America is not made for bikes or pedestrians. It is actively hostile to them in the best cases, and filled with explicit murderous intent in others.

Drivers will actually, actively, try to hit you for daring to take to the roads. And you have to take the road because we have sparse or missing pedestrian sidewalks.

I wouldn't wish biking 3 miles in most American cities on anyone used to a properly designed nation.

[-] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

Not everyone is child free and lives where it doesn’t rain

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Gsus4@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

hear hear for small cars

PS: and walkable/cyclable cities

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I could get on board if manufacturers were making $10,000 sub 50 mile vehicles that were compatible with a swap station so you could switch to a larger battery for the weekend. This would have to be a standard adopted by all however, and even before that, they’d have to make small cars. Which they won’t, because we all know they are too busy making trucks and SUVs.

they make $10k ev's with 250 mile ranges that are for sale everywhere except the united states & canada. you can get them in australia or western europe for a 50-75%-ish tariff depending on which country you're in..

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

I think an automated battery swap system would work best for OTR trucking. Pull in, battery packs swapped, off they go. The charge for much larger batteries would take longer, or at least would be better done not attached to a vehicle for maintenance or in case of thermal problems.

[-] sleepmode@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There’s a company doing this already. Giant battery sits behind the cab. They drive up, unplug it like a LEGO with a huge robot arm, plunk in a new one and good to go.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

I think an automated battery swap system would work best for OTR trucking.

Yes, that and other commercial vehicles that put on a lot of miles in a day, every day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 months ago

I think it's great to see this happening. I've always thought this option makes sense. I still wish the solution was a drone that comes right to you and drops a battery into a port on your roof while you are still driving, but I guess that is going to have to wait.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

I want to see someone try.

Not because it's practical, or because it makes sense. But because it sounds like it makes sense but I'm practice would be so impractical and hard that the solution would be absolutely hilarious.

You're driving along the freeway at 70 miles an hour, and a jet powered super drone rockets along side the car carrying a 2000 pound brick of lithium and drops it on top of you like a fucking dump truck. The shock crushes the cheap Chinese car like a can of soda and the sudden change in weight sends the drone careening off in to the air at a reasonable percentage of mach 1. The last thing you see on this earth as your brain matter is squeezed out of your eye sockets like toothpaste is a wide eyed driver in the car next to you.

The resulting pile up kills 4 people immediately, and several more later as they get caught in an expanding wave of lithium battery fires that either burn them to death or suck all of the oxygen out of the air.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 7 points 3 months ago

I can see so many issues with what you're proposing, but hey auto grenade dropping drones have great military application

[-] Dewe@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

The example of driving from Paris to Mt St Michel where you have to plan carefully to get to ‘the only supercharger’ east of Paris is a bit stupid. Why not charge at Total, Engie, or even Lidl? I assume Teslas are not exclusively charged at superchargers, which can be pretty slow at 150kW when there are 300kW options as well.

A good and in France rapidly improving charging network is important, swapping batteries sounds nice but brings so many compatibility and standardization issues, not considering ownership/lock-in etc.

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I stopped reading the article there.

Either the author is voluntarily misleading or he has no idea of what he is talking about.

Here is the map all the fast charging stations (>100kW) along the way between Paris and the Mont St Michel.

The Tesla model 3 in Europe uses the standard combo CCS plug so it can use all of these stations.

https://files.catbox.moe/8v8j4l.png

I did not count them but at a first glance the number of charger is higher than "none"

Edit: OK I read the article after all but I really don't see what problem battery swapping would solve.

I could see a use case for public transport that has to go a specific road and need to run non stop every days but even then I suspect that having overhead cable on a short section to charge the battery while running would be more appropriate than battery swapping.

The article is talking about the lack of charging station but battery swapping just make the problem way way worse. A battery charger is just a parking spot and a high voltage AC - DC transformer connected to the grid. It's relatively cheap and easy to install, does not take much space and work for all electric cars compared to a battery swapping station that can only work for one specific brand (specific model too ?) need robotics and plenty of storage. Its much harder and expensive to install and you need one charging station per brand. This means less stations overall.

Finally there is the speed of charging, this is true that battery swapping is probably faster than fast charging but honestly I don't find charging an electric car that inconvenient.

On long highway trips I need to stop around 20 minutes every 2 hours, a 20 minutes break every 2 hours is not that bad, just enough time for a toilet break, a quick coffee before going back on the road.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

"Battery Station" vs. "Gas Station" should've been a no brainer from day one.

Next best plan should be "electric roads" that are powered by green tech.

Of course it all would be massively expensive. Sadly, it's clear that the powers that be to protect Earth's climate do not give a shit.

[-] Gsus4@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Highways could totally have power lines overhead...the problem is just finding the best way of getting it to the car safely (I don't like the trolley-style solution).

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 months ago
  1. Book a swap in the app
  2. arrive in the lineup.
  3. serves one car at a time like an oil change
  4. the station has to constantly be charging the used batteries.

Or

Install 4-6 high speed chargers in the same spot and clear more cars faster .

Essentially the swap station is only better if you arrive without a lineup. The swap takes 7-10min and is manned. If you are one or two cars deep waiting you are better to have just found a charger

[-] rekorse@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Why wouldn't you compare like situations? It appears you chose a rather well set-up charging station vs. a poorly setup swapping station.

I didn't picture an oil change when I imagined a battery swap station, I am not sure that should be the default or starting point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gsus4@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago

True, mass parallel charging can fulfill more peak demand faster, but from the point of view of the user, it would still be good to have the option to fill/exchange the battery quickly.

[-] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

An EV6 on an capable fast charger can do 10% to 80% in 17 min

They need to make the swap faster / higher throughput or charging is still going to make more sense .

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
394 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58221 readers
3265 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS