269
submitted 11 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 75 points 11 months ago

Ramin Setoodeh, co-editor-in chief at Variety, said he did an hour long sit-down interview with Trump

A few months later, Setoodeh met with Trump again... Trump had "no recollection of our lengthy interview,"

Setoodeh said. "As the journalist who spent the most time with him,"

Yeah, sure you are little buddy. Because no other journalist got more than 2 interviews. MF had Megan Kelly and Tucker on speed dial.

TFW you're really just a forgettable person.

[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

I have questioned Trump's cognitive abilities. He's definitely declined mentally over the last 30 years.

But you're absolutely right on this. These people meet hundreds or thousands of people daily and do lots of interviews. It's not surprising at all.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Maybe you have a memory as bad as Trump's, because if I spent two hours with someone one-on-one and then saw them just a few months later, I'd remember them.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

Here's what you're ignoring.

A good executive has a staff that reminds him of these things. Even if it was a brief meeting, Trump should have been aware that he'd had a sit down with them before.

Either Trump was reminded and forgot, or he's too incompetent to set up a basic system like this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farley_file

[-] Why9@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago

He wants the presidency to exonerate himself. That's it. He knows he's going to prison if he loses the election.

He has zero care or motivation to further the country once he's in power. He wants to save his own ass and his properties.

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

He has zero care or motivation to further the country once he’s in power. He wants to save his own ass and his properties.

Sadly, this is the best case scenario if he manages to win.

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 5 points 11 months ago

If he wins, there will be a war on anyone that didn't support him.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 45 points 11 months ago

Senility and being a world-class narcissist will do that to a “man.”

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago
[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago
[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Well then is he a woman or nonbinary?

[-] Naich@lemmings.world 12 points 11 months ago

He's a barely-sentient blob of malice and burger fat.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

He’s a little child. He’s not a man by classic definition because men have honor and integrity.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

If he's an adult then he deserves every bit of criticism he's ever gotten. But if he's a child, then why are you picking on a little kid?

I always thought being a rapist was traditionally reserved for adults anyway.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

Okay… we’re done here.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Can't stand to see me call Trump a rapist

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

ROFL! Know who you’re arguing with before you go editing the worst others… mmmmkay?

No, I can definitely stand to see someone call a rapist a rapist. I’m just not going to argue irrelevant details over what I meant by “man” just because you decided to focus on the wrong part of my point.

In my eyes, he’s no man. He’s barely a human to be honest. So let’s not make assumptions of people we don’t know, savvy?

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

If you don't like Trump, why do you keep defending him by calling him a child and a narcissist? Why do you keep putting the role of victim on him when he's a rapist and a Nazi? Trump is not a child, he's responsible for his actions. And he's not a narcissist, his actions are not the result of queerness or disability. He is a neurotypical, heterosexual, adult man. He is a privileged, powerful, bigoted individual. Erasing his privilege and trying to paint him as a vulnerable minority is inexcusable.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Okay… you’re not getting it and I’m not a fan of exercising futility. So let’s call it a day.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

I understand that you think you're dunking on Trump, but that's not what your actions are. You don't seem to grasp the fact that accusing a Nazi of being a minority isn't a dunk.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

You understand that you’re not the authority on what a “dunk” is.

Just walk away from this. It’s pointless. We’re done.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Sorry... how is calling someone a narcissist a defense?

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Well asexuals are widely recognised as queer and hardly anyone who has the faintest political literacy is against them. It's not like Fox News is going after them like they go after gay and trans people, so when someone is aphobic they're generally considered absolutely ridiculous by the kinds of people who use Lemmy. And calling Trump asexual would seem to imply that he's not a rapist and serial sexual assaulter, which he absolutely is. I'm never going to stand for somebody calling Trump asexual.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Ok, but how is calling someone a narcissist a defense?

Are you under the bizarre impression that 'narcissist' is a synonym for 'asexual?'

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, it's based on the Greek character Narcissus, who was hated for being asexual. One of the incels he rejected prayed to Nemesis to make him fall in love with that which he cannot have, so she made him fall in love with his reflection so he'd starve to death. It's a story about how Greek culture was aphobic. They didn't understand asexuality and attributed not wanting to fuck anyone to hubris. So if you call someone a narcissist, you're saying they have an asexuality motivated by pride. Which is honestly aphobic and disgusting nonsense.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Etymology is cool. Too bad it doesn't have any effect on what a word meaning is today because when I say you're being silly, I'm not using the original Middle English meaning, which is 'blessed.' I mean you're being silly.

Also, psychiatrists do not use that word to mean 'asexual' either.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/narcissistic-personality-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20366662

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Telling people that Trump is neurodivergent and his evil is caused by being disabled is also fucked up. It simultaneously garners sympathy for a fascist and villifies disabled people.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

And now you're just being dishonest. He was called a narcissist, not someone with narcissistic personality disorder.

It's not a crime to say you were wrong, you know.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

You're the one who brought up NPD. If it's not a slur against disabled people it's a slur against asexuals. You're completely ignoring the influence of Christopher Lasch's book on pop culture vernacular.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Let me preface this by saying that when I tell you "stop being daft, dude," I am not suggesting you cease to be a well-mannered city person who doesn't know how things work around here.

So stop being daft, dude.

[-] allcopsarebad@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Do you honestly think you're changing anyone's mind with your banal whinging?

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

No, I'm just trying to convince people that using slurs is a bad idea because if you do, you'll be subjected to "banal whinging" about how slurs are bad. Thread top could have avoided all this by not using a slur, and nothing bad would have happened.

[-] allcopsarebad@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's not a slur to call Trump anything you fucking want. Stop trying to police language. Punching up is ALWAYS acceptable. YOU brought up asexuality first. You're the one with a problem.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

So, if someone were to call Trump a

Warning: hate speechfaggot ladyboy tranny autist r*tard orange-n****r

, you would 100% agree with this move and applaud the person describing Trump with these words?

[-] allcopsarebad@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I couldn't give a flying fuck if some monster wants to call a worse monster bigoted nonsense. My world is so much bigger than the grumblings of morons.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Well, as a gay and trans autistic person, I don't think those words are appropriate to use in earnest in any context. Maybe you should try listening to minorities on the subject of slurs.

[-] allcopsarebad@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

It's a fat sack of worthless carbon.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

He's a child. Mentally, a small boy with daddy issues.

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago

tRump is a steaming pile of shit. Guessing you might be too. I could be wrong, but I feel pretty good with that guess.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

Trump is a man because he's a rapist, and statistically most rapists are adult men. Accusing him of being a child denies his ability to wilfully sexually abuse others. Stop covering for his crimes and admit that he's a piece of shit adult man whose entire identity is founded in reactionary patriarchy.

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago

Fairly sure you replied to wrong person.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

Or maybe he's just a narcissist and racist enough that Ramin Setoodeh is not someone he would care about in the first place.

[-] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yes to both.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Suddenly makes a lot more sense:

"It's possible I have a picture with them because I have a picture with everybody. I don’t know them. I don’t know about them. I don’t know what they do."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/23/impeachment-hearings-times-trump-said-he-didnt-know-acquaintances/4253186002/

[-] smwygdl@infosec.pub 17 points 11 months ago

Selective hearing and a closet coke addiction will do that to ya

[-] 555@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

To be fair, I doubt he tries to remember most people because they mean nothing to him. He will simultaneously say he doesn’t know someone, but that they are “good people,” or a “great guy.”

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I have really bad memory like that. So I don't run for president. So it's not a good idea to let that guy run either.

this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
269 points (100.0% liked)

News

29434 readers
2735 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS