Is it a third-party app store if Apple decides what it's allowed to offer?
The EU will absolutely take issue with this. What they’ve done is beyond the scope of the law … again.
a piece of paper doesn't matter if theres no enforcement.
from the law enforcement or the implementation itself.
Its against the law after the first time
Apple and it’s policies can feck off
So precious. I bet you don’t even use Apple products.
of course not, why would i pay a premium for it.
Then you have no business here. Begone. I’ll just block you in the meantime.
if you wanna block anyone who criticises apple for their business practices you'll be blocking a lotta people
Ya, but the community is literally called apple enthusiast. You don’t sound like an enthusiast if you hate the brand and don’t use it.
It is possible I think to enjoy a company's products without defending everything the company does, especially not the things that benefit the company at the expense of the owners of said products
You can be an enthusiast and still be able to criticise. Apple has changed a lot over the years, and not always for the better.
I got this on the front page, I don't need to be an apple apologist to see the news. If you don't want non fanboys, tell your admin to disallow it there
How appropriate that you're bitching about people coming into your walled garden to criticize Apple.
So only Apple enthusiasts are allowed in here? Everyone else is forbidden from entering?
ok thats just peachy
Nobody cares who you block. Go ahead and block me. I used to have plenty of apple stuff in the past and have none now because they charge a premium for something that they barely change with each "new" iphone that comes out.
Done. Blocked.
What a child lol
What a strange bird.
I have a Mac at work, and apple trying to control what people does with their devices is stupid and they should be shamed for it.
Checkmate!
#1 reason I stick with PCs. Apple deciding that it knows best and deciding how users get to use their machines thanks to the Apple walled garden.
Windows would like to catch up, but thankfully you’re still free to completely break it if you want.
If you want the most freedom just use linux you can do anything you want at all given you know how to
I already do.
Apple and its* policies.
I thought it was “it’s” as it’s a possessive apostrophe?
The policies are Apple’s, so it’s would be an appropriate substitution, no?
No, the possessive apostrophe doesn't apply to possessive pronouns. Apostrophes in pronouns are for abbreviations (like "he is" becomes "he's" and "it is" becomes "it's")
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/pronouns-possessive-my-mine-your-yours-etc
And: https://promova.com/content/86_Possessive_Pronouns_in_English_41a7b3d23c.png
However, as it stands, UTM is not proceeding to contest the ruling. As apps distributed on iOS cannot use a JIT compiler (other than specially entitled alternative browser engines), the functionality and performance of the emulators running through UTM SE, the version submitted for review that had JIT disabled, was significantly impaired. UTM says getting UTM SE approved “isn’t worth fighting for”.
Oh. Well okay then.
I don't think EU will like the part about third-party stores.
@neme I like how the devs were like “eh, it’s not even that good of an app, whatever”
Yeah well because Apple doesn't allow JIT compilation, so the performance would've sucked anyway.
I’d guess Windows for Arm would perform fine though.
Not really… I have tried it before on an m1 iPad. It is not usable for any windows version. XP for example takes over 15 minutes just to boot. It takes multiple seconds for clicks to register, etc.
Linux, like Debian for example, will be much more usable, but still far from anything you would call a smooth experience.
Again, not having JIT really kills the performance here.
Why is a jit needed for native arm software?
Because ARM is not the same as ARM. Windows arm does not natively run on an Apple M1 Processor and MacOS does not run on a raspberry pi.
because its not about jit per se, its about marking pages of memory as executable. doesn't matter whether you compile it or load it from disk, you need to mark the memory as executable so the cpu will run it, and that isnt something "normal" ios apps are allowed to do.
Ok.
Apple
Welcome
to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!
Rules:
- No NSFW Content
- No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
- No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread
Communities of Interest:
Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple
Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode
Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.