415
submitted 5 months ago by Anise to c/news@lemmy.world

"Along with their anger about abortion, they grouse about not being allowed to punish students "for being homosexual or transgender." They also argue they should be able to penalize teaching assistants for "cross-dressing," by which they appear to mean allowing trans women to wear skirts."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 125 points 5 months ago
[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 20 points 5 months ago

Right!?! Doesn't this smack of simple jealousy that the professors can't have as much fun as their students? Their lives must be so empty, which explains why others living their best lives, with lovers, friends, and community is so offensive.

[-] satanmat@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Sir, please pickup line 2, they said it was Texas calling, but I think it was Giliad just disgusting their voice…

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 75 points 5 months ago

Religious extremists always use the "slippery slope" argument against progress, because that's what they want.

If anyone ever tells you they have to do something because their religious texts says so, you need to immediately look at the craziest shit that's in there.

Because either they're lying about their reason for doing the first thing, or they're working their way up to the craziest shit.

And regardless of what religion it is, there's going to be some absolutely horrible shit in there.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

*except for The Satanic Temple and Pastafarianism.

[-] Plague_Doctor@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The Bible actually references abortion and priests giving them to women who their husbands believe were unfaithful. And how that was particularly okay to do. Idk seems to me these folks don't read the Bible.

Bible verses, Numbers 5:11-28 https://www.biblestudytools.com/numbers/5.html

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

Christians that aren't sociopaths, who actually read the Bible (aka, actually comprehend it), typically don't stay Christian very long.

[-] freshcow@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

I love this take on religion.
Parallels with the "stupid or evil" assessment I always have to do for conservatives in general

[-] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

you need to immediately look at the craziest shit that's in there. Because either they're lying about their reason for doing the first thing, or they're working their way up to the craziest shit

I know a lot of people that will cite Leviticus to explain how homosexuality is bad, yet none of them like to talk about the parts of Leviticus that condone and regulate who you should enslave and how you should treat your slaves. 🤔

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 74 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Two. Two professors. Two are suing for their right to be shitheads. This needs to be clarified. It's not a class action lawsuit or anything. The vast majority of profs I had at UT-Austin, if they are still teaching there, were almost certainly protesting Palestinian occupation along with the students.

(This being said and Texas being what it is, I am surprised it isn't more than two. I can't leave this state fast enough.)

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I'm sure our current SCOTUS, which said that the right to bodily autonomy doesn't exist because it wasn't enumerated even though the Constitution clearly says not all rights are, will have no problem using the exact same reasoning to slap these two Texassholes down, right?

Right?

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

Even before the overturn of roe v wade the right to bodily autonomy, as you're using the term, did not exist, as even roe v wade concluded that the state might have a compelling interest to restrict abortion in some cases. And most states had some kind of restriction in place.

And when the scotus overturned it, they didn't remove the right to bodily autonomy, but the implicit right to privacy.

[-] acetanilide@lemmy.world 67 points 5 months ago

Instead, Bonevac writes, because pregnancy is the result of "voluntary and consensual sexual intercourse,"

So apparently you can't get pregnant when you're raped. That's great to know /s

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 76 points 5 months ago

If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.

  • Former US House Representative Todd Atkin
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I’m not confident that dipshit could even point out a vagina in a police lineup.

Edit: he’s dead so he definitely can’t

[-] acetanilide@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Awww man, I missed the news of his funeral. How sad.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Unfortunately for him, his body didn’t have a way of shutting his prostate cancer down for him

[-] Plague_Doctor@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

His must have been a legitimate cancer.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

He certainly was.

[-] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

That's on him for consenting to prostate cancer /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 21 points 5 months ago

Let’s keep dismantling the education system and see if this fixes things

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago

That fucker doubled down on that too admitting that he regretted his apology and stands by being a fucking dunce.

[-] acetanilide@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Wow. I wonder if he thinks that human vaginas have crazy twists and turns and dead ends in it like some other animals do

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 4 points 5 months ago

Gosh, I wonder what party he belongs to.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I am so sad that this is burned into my brain.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago

By this logic they should be perfectly fine with any sex that can’t lead to pregnancy, right?

Right?

Right?

[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 57 points 5 months ago

Dudes that aren't getting laid upset that other people are getting laid

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 26 points 5 months ago

the people who are maddest about gays are the ones who are secretly gay and hate themselves most of all. they only say "it's a choice" because they made the choice to suppress it and are angry at anyone who chooses "to thine own self be true"

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago

If the students disobey and miss class for abortion care, the filing continues, the professors should be allowed to flunk students.

...and...

The two men argue that granting students an excused absence in such cases violates their First Amendment rights.

And one of these guys is a philosophy professor.

[-] Anise 3 points 5 months ago

For real. It really is a statement about the quality of that school of their philosophy professors can't understand the non-agression principle, or bodily autonomy, or where one persons rights ends and the other's begins... Apparently don't send your kids to school in Texas.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 54 points 5 months ago

"It is a violation of my rights to not be able to interfere with the healthcare of my female students!" - These assholes, apparently

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 41 points 5 months ago

I'm straight AF, but I'll show up in a kilt (and go regimental to boot) any time my trans friends need an ally.

[-] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 36 points 5 months ago

Hell, I'll show up in a silk negligee and edible panties. Wait, what are we talking about again?

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 27 points 5 months ago

Well I was talking about skirting the rules, but your idea has merit, too.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 11 points 5 months ago

Skirting the rules by using a dress code. Excellent!

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 13 points 5 months ago
[-] 4am@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

I’ll join this Muumuuvement

[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 16 points 5 months ago

Huge surprise that conservatives hate consensual sex.

They seem to be really focused on just punishing people

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 9 points 5 months ago

The two rules of Conservatism:

  • I get to do what I want.
  • You have to do what I say.

The professors get to do what they want and flunk whomever they want. The students have to do what they say and only have sex on their religious terms.

[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago

That's a perfect description of the conservative mindset.

It's like when they crow about "freedom of speech", which they invariably use to mean "our freedom to be bigoted against you"

[-] BubbleMonkey@slrpnk.net 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

How the fuck do these people think they are going to know an absence is for an abortion? Do they really think their female students are going to volunteer that information in fucking Texas of all places?

It’s pretty damned easy to say “I need time off for a medical procedure” and nothing else, because they aren’t allowed to ask what sort of medical care you are getting. They can ask for a doctors note I suppose but that’s pretty easy to get, and also doesn’t have reasons on it. Or they can say they have a wedding or funeral to attend or whatever.

Or do they think because it’s a woman it’s safe to just assume, as many medical professionals do, that everything medical is related to reproductive systems?

This whole thing is just really gross for no reason other than to be gross. They are just mad they aren’t sleeping with these women.

Although in fairness, I don’t think students should be held to attendance standards in college anyway, it’s a lazy grading metric for failure schools that admit shit students. As adults, students may have other things going on that they need to handle, and if they fail to do the work as a result that’s their problem. I only had a handful of classes that gave a shit about attendance, and I dropped the ones I could because I’m not a child and that’s stupid. (Discussion based courses maybe, but even then, it should be based on participation not attendance)

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

If you are female and have to take time off for a medical procedure, they'll just assume it's an abortion and flunk you. After all, why are you in school anyway? You don't need an education to clean house and have babies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Thumbnail looks like an establishing shot from a zombie movie.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I knew a trans biology professor at UNT. Just looked her up and she's still there but I wonder for how long

I looked her up on ratemyprofessor and while she's not very popular, every comment is about lack of organization, none about gender. I am admittedly surprised

[-] makeasnek@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

Another great reason why we need good, anonymous currency and more privacy in society. Everything’s all fine and dandy till your bank or google maps rats you out.

[-] xor 17 points 5 months ago

So... cash?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
415 points (100.0% liked)

News

23376 readers
1889 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS