690

Spotify is officially raising its Premium subscription rates in the US come July, following reports of the move in April. The platform is increasing its Individual plan from $11 to $12 monthly and its Duo plan from $15 to $17 monthly — the same jump as last year's $1 and $2 price hikes, respectively. However, its Family plan is going up by a whopping $3, increasing from $17 to $20 monthly. The only subscribers getting a break are students, who will continue to pay $6 monthly.

Spotify announced the price hikes less than a year after its previous one last July. Before that, Spotify hadn't raised its fees since launching a decade and a half ago. I guess it was too optimistic to hope the next increase would also take that long, especially with Spotify's continued focus (and money dump) on audiobooks.

Premium subscribers should receive an email from Spotify in the next month detailing the price hike and providing a link to cancel their plan if they would prefer to do so. Users currently on a trial period for Spotify will get one month at $11 after it ends before being moved up to a $12 monthly fee.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 156 points 11 months ago
[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 76 points 11 months ago

As someone else said: it doesn't replace streaming even a little. Pirating is replacing buying music directly. Streaming facilitates finding new music and trying it out. Being able to listen to anything at any time. You simply can't do that with downloads; no one can download everything. Piracy in this case really just works for people still listening to their highschool favs and not people looking for new stuff all the time.

[-] veeesix@lemmy.ca 16 points 11 months ago

I used to download exclusively when I was younger, but as I get older I’m trying out new genres from different cultures than my own and I’d miss out on it all without a streaming service.

In my opinion it’s worth it.

[-] small44@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

I never had trouble finding new music without those recommandation algorithms.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world 65 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't mind paying $10/mo for access to millions of songs on demand, even if the caveat is that I don't own anything at the end of my subscription.

I understand costs have gone up, so I can accept a $1 increase in subscription. The problem is that Spotify wants to do a bunch of side projects at my expense. I have no interest in podcasts or audiobooks yet I must fork up the extra money to fund it. I have no say in what my money is being used for and I hate that.

It's why I moved from it to Tidal and then to Apple Music (even though I'm on Android). Both have their own issues but at least they're focused on music.

[-] GenEcon@lemm.ee 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The problem is that Spotify is losing money each year. They aren't profitable. And if they are keep focusing on music, they never will. Their deal with the music labels says that they need to give 70 % of each subscription to the music labels. So by getting more people to signup, they only marginally increase their revenue. Same goes for raising their prices.

Thats why they tried focusing on Podcasts and Audiobooks. Those are a lot more profitable, either by adding ads (Podcasts) or by charging a premium (audiobooks).

[-] kwirky@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's amazing to think how incompetent their management must be that they're charging more, delivering lower audio quality, and paying less to artists than competitors like Tidal, yet still aren't profitable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] archomrade@midwest.social 55 points 11 months ago
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Drummyralf@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

About 10 years ago I got rid of most of my cd's because I thought I would just use spotify. Now I'm slowly gathering a cd collection again from thriftstores (or buy albums in store if it's newer music and I want to support the artist). I rip them all to flac and add them to my Plex.

I've noticed I listen to music more now. I find new cool songs by artists by listening through whole albums again. Because of the time commitment of ripping and physically flipping through cd's, I actually care again about the music that I gather and listen.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 11 months ago

More money More crap nobody wants like audio books Still haven’t seen cd quality streaming yet

I used to happy with Spotify before the enshitificatuon happened…

[-] Schal330@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

What annoys me is you still have to pay for audio books.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well considering the last price hike got us gems like the music 8-ball/magic crystal thing, I can barely wait to see what banger they'll come up with to bloat my music player with next.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CorrodedCranium@leminal.space 33 points 11 months ago

How does this compare to other music streaming services these days?

[-] Voyajer@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago

Tidal is $11/mo for an individual and $17 for a 6 person family plan. I recently switched because they supposedly give a better cut to artists and serve flac files.

[-] Norgur@fedia.io 43 points 11 months ago

Yeah. Never thought I'd see the day when Tidal was cheaper than crappy Spotify.

[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

If i wasn't paying for a family play on Spotify, I would have resorted to music piracy at this point. The quality is still garbage, the service is getting worse, but the prices are only going up every half a year

[-] variants@possumpat.io 15 points 11 months ago

I tried sourcing my own music but man it's a lot harder than movies and shows. Especially when you like to hear random recommended music how do you get enough

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] impure9435@kbin.run 20 points 11 months ago

Apple Music only raised the price by $1 since the launch in 2015 (9 years ago). But they added cool features like lossless audio quality and Dolby Atmos. They also had lyrics like 6 years before Spotify added them. I think you can even get it for $6 dollars if you're a student.

[-] ji17br@lemmy.ml 17 points 11 months ago

They also payout about 2.5X what Spotify does to artists.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Their CEO just boasted about how making content for their platform comes with zero cost for the creators. So, why are they raising rates? Is the whole "you pay to support the creators" trope a lie? I am confused.

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

Just a reminder that the Tidal family account at the maximum subscription "grade" costs €16.

So you and 4x buddies can get very high quality audio for €3.20/mth.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] DrummXYBA@feddit.uk 25 points 11 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

I'm all for going sailing but if there are features you want that that can't quite replicate, it's also a great time to look at a VPN service with a server in Turkey... Sign up on a Turkish IP and the exchange rate puts you under $2/month USD. This works for a lot of other things too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 24 points 11 months ago

Still happily buying music on Bandcamp. Their discovery stuff is pretty good, too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

I was a Google Play Music person and loved it, and then they changed to YouTube. I got mad and tried Apple Music, but as a classical music lover it's vastly less than ideal for several reasons, so I went to Spotify and realized they liked to shuffle Britney Spears into me listening to lieder, so I went back to YouTube because at least they didn't do that. But it's just so basic compared to the absolute perfection that was GPM, and difficult to navigate. I don't know where to go next. I've been buying records on Bandcamp but I also like the streaming service to discover music with.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] Cornpop@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Just canceled my family plan. I like Apple Music more anyways.

[-] jpeps@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

For anyone who hasn't checked their Spotify subscription for a while, I recently discovered a new basic tier created underneath the premium one that is a little cheaper simply by not including the 'free' 15 hours of audiobooks. I've never used it and don't intend to. YMMV.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RinseDrizzle@midwest.social 18 points 11 months ago

Bookmarking this page so I can learn modern sailing techniques. Audiophiles who sail the seven seas, please teach me your ways! My most hasn't hit the surf in a hot minute.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] anthony@lemmy.cif.su 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Who else is still using YouTube Music ReVanced?

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago

It's a good thing we haven't risen Wages between last Price Hike and this Price Hike. Otherwise Spotify might be forced to Raise Their Prices!

[-] Caesium@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

I gotta start direct downloading my music again soon. Spotify has just left me feeling so frustrated lately.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bbuez@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Im just happy my cracked apk somehow still works. Lol

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 14 points 10 months ago

Quality isn't good enough to justify the price. Apple Music and Tidal have better quality of sound.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] art@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm sure this is the last time. 😉

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Wahots@pawb.social 14 points 10 months ago

I wish we could offload podcasts and audio books. I have zero interest in them, or paying for them.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

And fucking Joe asshole Rogan. We're paying for his Neanderthal 150 million contract.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 13 points 11 months ago

People still use spotify? Huh, TIL.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Prices will continue to go up until the number of subscribers lost due to the price increase outweighs the additional profit from the subscribers who agree to pay the higher amount.

Capitalism machine goes brrrrrrr

[-] x0chi@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

In the early 90s I used to pay around 10 to 15 euros (20 to 30 with current inflation) for each CD release.

And still we still complain nowadays.

We got a problem with the streaming industry but it's not the price we pay. We must be reasonable, say that the price is 15 bucks, is that really unreasonable for getting at your fingertips and everywhere most of the music even produced? I don't.

I think the major problem with Spotify isn't Spotify problem, but an industry problem. If I remember correctly, Spotify gets around 30%, then there's the distributor, and it gets around 40%. Whatever's left of the cake is divided between the label and the artist depending on the contract. The industry created something that didn't need to exist, another intermediate, the distributor. First apple used them cause of the work they do arranging all the needed metadata and keeping it tidy. The industry created them, now it can't get rid of them, and they "eat" the most part of the money.

[-] Spez@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 10 months ago

Then why does tidal for the same price as spotify with way less users pay four times as much to the artists than spotify? Spotify has the largest market share and now they are trying to milk the cow as much as they can because people are too lazy to switch. Most people don’t even know that you can transfer playlists. Same with Netflix (although they at least have more exclusive content).

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

If your library supports it, there's Freegal music. It's the library version of Spotify.

https://freegalmusic.com

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JSens1998@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago

I don't understand why people pay for a music subscription when you can just use YouTube Music (ReVanced or FOSS YTMusic clients) for the freezies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If switching services, this web service that moves your music between streaming services worked well for me. Paid $5 for one month then canceled https://soundiiz.com/

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
690 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69449 readers
3213 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS