76
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 32 points 10 months ago

Have you tried spending less on making them?

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 14 points 10 months ago

Maybe he should start by paying himself no bonus and cut his own salary, seeing that the company is in a nosedive position when he's in charge.

[-] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

Well, they have tried shutting down most of their studios. So... kinda?

[-] RabbitMix 30 points 10 months ago

They can make them more than $70USD and I'll just keep waiting for a sale. I haven't bought one at $70 yet, I'm certainly not going to pay even more.

[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 17 points 10 months ago

I haven't bought a game for more than $30 in over a decade.

And that was a nostalgia purchase.

Increasing the price just makes me want to go sailing.

[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Satisfactory £28, Farming simulator £24, House flipper £21, the good games are all less than £30

[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 4 points 10 months ago

Hell I've got THREE versions of farming simulator I got free from steam, epic, or somewhere else (legitimately)

I could start on my backlog of sub $15 games and be fine until current releases are sub $15.

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

Recently started up Crysis 3.

[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Very nice! I just picked up watch dogs and watch dogs 2 deluxe editions as a bundle for like $13 after tax.

I'm even eyeing the rdr2 sale on epic right nowcfor under 25.

There are so many good options that don't look dated at all to me.

Honestly, crysis looked amazing on my 10 year old laptop. I kind of want to replay them again on my new one to see how much better everything looks on ultra.

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I loved to bully the bad guys with the cop and gang calling feature in Watch Dogs 2.
I would just sit there and wait until the NPCs killed themselves. ;D
Have yet to play Watch Dogs 1.

Kind of have a track record of playing a series in reverse...

[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago

Gang wars were my jam while playing WD2. Cruising around the block scanning people for botnet recharges, and calling in reinforcements every time one side gets wiped out.... Good times.

[-] EfficientEffigy@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Wait. Wasn't the whole point of competition to bring prices down?

[-] superfes@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Plus you'd think that with distribution costs, shelving costs, CD stamping costs and printing manuals, they'd already be cutting our costs... but it's not about us.

[-] borth@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

That "did" cut our costs. Like the first year. The next year that'd be a net increase of 0%, and you can't have numbers not go up every year

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 17 points 10 months ago

They can do that, but I'm not paying.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago

looks up

shakes head

goes back to Balatro

[-] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

Ooh, a two pair

[-] ExfilBravo@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Lol I pirated a game the other day just because the company was charging full price for a remaster.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

On the one hand, games have stayed the same price for a long time, well below the rate of inflation.

On the other, wages have also stayed well below inflation for a long time. I don't expect they'll see the growth they want when a game purchase takes a larger and larger bite out of someone's paycheck.

[-] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago

It's a good example for how inflation isn't something constant that affects everything equally. Game development costs are mostly wages, if wages stay below inflation then development costs stay below inflation unless teams get larger, and especially game development is known for paying rather low wages.

[-] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 months ago

Development, yes. Executives, the sky is the limit.

Especially when you have a great success, like laying off tonnes of your employees, which Embracer has been leading the charge on.

[-] obinice@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Beyond £55? They cost £55 now?!

That's a significant portion of the cost of a brand new console! That's two weeks worth of electricity for my house! That's 6 months worth of my mobile phone service! Jesus wept.

I'm not paying more than £40 for a video game, and at that price it had better be a GREAT game.

I mostly wait until they're in the £20-30 range anyway, even if that means waiting for sales. I'm not in a rush, I've got plenty of other games I can play in the mean time after all.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Your mobile service is incredibly cheap

[-] Mako_Bunny 1 points 10 months ago

Brand new ps5 games were releasing for £70

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 10 points 10 months ago

Ohh wow, what a weasel. Dude can't even keep their own company intact and still talk big.

[-] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago

The man doesn't want the industry to thrive, he wants money in his own pocket ASAP.

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 8 points 10 months ago

Games from last year will still be less than half of that though, right?

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sekiro still sell for 60 dollar. The industry figured out they can use scarcity in a form of limited time discount to encourage customer to make purchase, so there's no need to lower the base price forever.

[-] it_is_soup_time@techhub.social 6 points 10 months ago

@nanoUFO I’m still not used to new games costing $70 USD yet since I buy most of my games used. In my head, $70 games are still the “Deluxe Editions”. If someone released a $100 game, I’d probably think of it as the “Super Deluxe Edition” and wait for it to be $60.

[-] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I pretty much exclusively play and buy indie games nowadays but in Canada it's around $80 to $90 for new games not including tax. Don't think any AAA game would draw me for that kind of price. I could get selaco, crow country and probably world of goo 2 for that price.

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago

I'll wait till they're on sale for under 30. Over 70??? Yeah, if I really want it, i'd hit the high seas for it.

[-] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

Just sail the high seas.

Very often games are mediocre and/ or not even fully finished which results in a buggy mess,

[-] pkmkdz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Very often games are mediocre and/ or not even fully finished which results in a buggy mess,

AAA trash, sure
Indie games are often 10-20 USD and totally worth the money

[-] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Sadly indie games more and more scratch on the 45€ mark and it sucks.

this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
76 points (100.0% liked)

Games

18418 readers
989 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS