777
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 236 points 2 years ago
[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 years ago

This is so sweet.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 2 years ago

*They’re all shithole countries anyway. -T

[-] dan@upvote.au 146 points 2 years ago

I'm amused at the fact that Australia doesn't allow convicted felons to enter.

Also doesn't Trump say that USA is #1? Why would he ever want to leave?

[-] athos77@kbin.social 80 points 2 years ago
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 41 points 2 years ago

Russia is notably not one of the countries which would disallow a convicted felon from entering.

[-] Balthazar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Australia has received too many convicted felons already, after they entered about 200 years ago.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 83 points 2 years ago

including canada and the UK! hahahahah

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As a brit I don't see this being enforced in the UK. The gov would be too scared that trump or an ally would come to power and we can't risk effecting the special welationship 👉👈

[-] projectsquared@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I’ve never had the use of two emojis make me this uncomfortable.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 years ago

Quick, remind me which country Trump's Aberdeenshire Golf course is in again?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Don't worry, Canada will do like it did for GWB and give him an exemption if it comes to that

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 82 points 2 years ago

You've got to love the irony here. He complained for years that people entering at the southern border were criminals and shouldn't be allowed in and now essentially other countries are saying the same thing about him.

[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 78 points 2 years ago

Damn, a former president is banned from entering more countries than I am. That's fucking wild and make me feel slightly better about some of the places I'll never see again.

[-] yukichigai@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago

Which ones and why?

I sense a fun story and I'm here for it.

[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 38 points 2 years ago

Not funny at all, actually. I got a DUI a month after turning 21. Fortunately, nothing terrible happened. There are many countries that either consider a DUI a felony (Canada) or just don't want you endangering their populace (Japan). There's quite a list, but it's less than 37, lol.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago

On behalf of my country, I'm sorry.

I honestly have no idea why Canada sees this as enough of a problem to prohibit you from visiting.

It's not like we don't have people here, who live here, who have DUIs. We do. Lots of them.

Honestly, while it's bad, it's not like you're coming over the border while driving under the influence. It just feels like something that should, at the very least, fall off, after a few years. Like, you get a DUI in 2020, you can't visit until 2025 or something like that.... As long as you don't get another DUI or other felony, sure, why not?

IDK. I'm just some guy, eh?

[-] stringere@leminal.space 11 points 2 years ago

IDK. I'm just some guy, eh?

Verified Canadian

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 years ago

Damn that's a shame cause japan is fun and it's cheapish currently cause of the yen plummeting.

[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

I spent six years there as a kid and experienced quite a bit. I really wanted to revisit as an adult, but that's not in the cards now. I will always cherish the memories of my time spent there, and I'm glad my parents made a point to see as much of the country, people, and culture as possible.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] casmael@lemm.ee 72 points 2 years ago

Right so can you guys please not vote for this guy now fuck my life 🤦‍♂️

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago

Best I can do is a historic number of people voting for him a 3rd time, still losing the popular vote and standing a decent chance at winning anyway

[-] casmael@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago
[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

This comment made all the dopamine leave my body at once. Now I look like Voldemort in death fetus mode, except fat and hairy

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately there are too many stupid Americans, sorry.

[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately the verdict will do nothing to sway his supporters away from him.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I’m signed up to his mailing list for fun. He described it as the darkest day in American history. I’d say roughly half of the country agrees with that assessment.

Saaaad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PanArab@lemm.ee 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Based on data from the World Population Review, here is a list of countries that do not allow convicted felons to enter:

  1. Argentina
  2. Australia
  3. Canada
  4. China
  5. Cuba
  6. India
  7. Iran
  8. Israel
  9. Japan
  10. Kenya
  11. Macau
  12. New Zealand
  13. South Africa
  14. Taiwan
  15. United Kingdom
  16. United States

The good news for Trump, is that the UAE is not on the list.

[-] Michal@programming.dev 30 points 2 years ago

Australia? I thought it was a requirement!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago

So if he does leave, he can't come back?

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 38 points 2 years ago

I'm pretty sure it's accepted pretty universally that countries must accept citizens back. Reason being, if they don't, the rejected person becomes another country's problem, and that is bad for relations.

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I hope because of some weird loophole he has to live in an airport like Tom Hanks

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 46 points 2 years ago

So, for arguments sake, he wins election. He can't enter those countries as a nations leader?

Dear God it'll be like Kristi Noem who can't enter half her state because the Indian tribes said so.

[-] ulkesh@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Pretty sure diplomatic immunity is a thing that would come into play.

[-] nickhammes@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Diplomatic immunity is the inability for someone visiting as a diplomat, which would include a US president visiting another country, to be held to a crime or civil penalty, with countries welcome to expel them for abusing this. I don't think that applies.

But a US president who is also a felon could technically be denied correctly by immigration officials, but could reach out to the prime minister to get this fixed, probably in advance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

His ban status will change if he wins. Indian Prime Minister Modi was banned from traveling to US but that changed the moment he was elected as PM.

[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

yep. a great example is the current president of the Philippines.

Wanted by interpol for millions (billions?) in theft and such, has international arrest warrants out for him, but they couldn't touch him when he visited New York.

His mother didn't join him though, because his immunity doesn't extend that far.

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago

Wait we don't allow people with felonies to enter? Quick! Get trump to leave the country!

I know it doesn't work that way but God would it be funny.

[-] Balthazar@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago

Donald Trump faces travel ban to 37 countries

That's 3 more countries than his 34 felony counts!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NataliePortland@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago
[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Wait, are criminals not allowed to vote in the US?

Jesus fucking hell, that is not ok.

[-] nehal3m@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think that's a rule from the 1870's mostly aimed at preventing black people from voting.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yep, in combination with "vagrancy" laws.

Here's how the scheme worked:

  1. Refuse to hire blacks for anything more than "might as well still be slavery" wages.

  2. Arrest unemployed blacks for "vagrancy."

  3. Re-enslave them (see "except as punishment for crime" clause of the 14th Amendment) and disenfranchise them as a bonus.

Edit: BTW, I highly recommend this video, which is where I learned about this (because it sure as Hell wasn't properly taught in my Georgia high school).

[-] charles@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

It depends on the state

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Apparently he will be able to vote as long as he doesn't go to prison. That's the state law of NY, and Florida's law is the defer to the state where the crime is.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Russia, maybe he goes to Russia. Putin and Trump now have the same enemy. Free western democratic justice system.

[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not sure why the UK is included here - the travel ban is:

  • has been convicted of a criminal offence in the UK or overseas for which they have received a custodial sentence of 12 months or more
  • is a persistent offender who shows a particular disregard for the law
  • has committed a criminal offence, or offences, which caused serious harm

Two of those look like something for the Home Secretary to decide, and good luck expecting the Home Secretary to make any sense.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
  • is a persistent offender who shows a particular disregard for the law

Yup that one right there. Textbook example

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
777 points (100.0% liked)

News

33653 readers
2297 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS