976
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ithral 126 points 6 months ago

If only they had stuck with that

[-] RadicalEagle@lemmy.world 75 points 6 months ago

They definitely abandoned the "do one thing well" philosophy.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 15 points 5 months ago

And the "don't be evil" philosophy

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

No they just changed the focus of that to making money.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 86 points 6 months ago

Ahh yes the "Do no evil" era.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 42 points 6 months ago

Notice that era was before they went public. Then it predictably became the "how do we make a profit this quarter?" era.

[-] red@sopuli.xyz 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's not a Google issue. That's literally each and every public traded corporation. They need to maximize shareholders profits by definition.

Could we stop stock markets and that? I'd love it.

I don't believe anyone decided to step in deeper shit one step at a time, they listed, and from there onwards it's the only possible path. Death by a thousand greedy strokes.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 5 months ago

It's a Google issue because the executives... specifically chose to chase higher profits on the stock exchange. There's plenty of private companies that make money, yet retain their soul and aren't at the quarterly whim of outside investors...

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

I would like to have been a fly on the wall at the meeting when they decided "OK now we're evil, right?"

[-] bamfic@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

are we the baddies?

[-] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

How the mighty have fallen

[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

yea, its funny to see xkcd.com/792 from 2010, back when google wasn't evil

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 21 points 6 months ago
[-] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago

As it turns out, making boatloads of money despite already doing that was the plan.

[-] Zekas@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

As someone said, the goal of capitalism isn't to have a lot of money, it is to have all of the money.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

You.....a mind traveler.

Me......in search of my own mind.

This plays out one of two ways. Either an adult swim animated show where your whole body is just my brain, and I stuff you back in my head through my ear.

The show revolves around you, trying to escape from inside my head. And me, trying to find you, and stuff you back inside.

ORRRRRRRRR

It's one of those lifetime romance movies. I'm Andre the Giant, and you're Bobby the Brain Heenan. They're lovers who have hit a rough patch, and the only way their marrage can survive the 1980s, is to take the WWF championship off of Hulk Hogan at Wrestlemania 3. They laugh, they live, they love, and then they cry when Hogan slams Andre.

..................what am I even doing with my life???

[-] deltreed@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

All these companies start off with altruistic intentions and then become evil. Money and power is helluva drug.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Google set out specifically to not be evil. They even set their company motto as "don't be evil". But then racist fucking psychopath Sundar Pichai was hired as CEO and the motto was scraped for "do the right thing", with the "right thing" always being evil. The new motto is only half spoken. The full motto is truly "do the right thing to obtain money and power at all costs".

[-] papalonian@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago

I wonder if this is the actual philosophy Google had at the time or if they always planned to be what they are now.

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago

There will always be a difference between the two-things-in-a-basement mentality and the oh-god-won't-somebody-think-of-the-shareholders mentality.

[-] petersr@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago
[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised if there was some kind of Steve Wozniak / Steve Jobs split personality thing going on. Maybe one or the other person involved were serious about the "don't be evil" thing. But the others were not.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 37 points 6 months ago

Time to re-integrate portal litter into our vocabularies

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago
[-] fleabomber@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I just Googled portal litter. Yeesh.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 19 points 5 months ago

yeah sorta funny how google took over partly because yahoo was so fully of ads and crap.

[-] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago
[-] CluckN@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago
[-] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I'm gonna believe it was Hustler, Larry Flynt was a big supporter of internet freedom.

[-] Faresh@lemmy.ml 17 points 6 months ago

If they had ads for themselves, I assume they had income. But they say that their platform doesn't have ads. Where did they get the money to pay their own ads?

[-] Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml 49 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Every source on the history of Google seems to ~~implicate~~ imply that their growth and development went:

Using their university resources -> surviving off of investor money -> starting monetization with targeted ads and raking in money

So it seems they had a phase of cornering their market with both public resources and off risky investments, then capitalised on having that exclusive appeal. Seems all too familiar, considering every damn tech startup under the sun now seems to go "trick investors or public funds" -> "corner market" -> "enshittifcation"

If someone else has some better info - go ahead and correct me, but there seems to be no mention of monetisation of Google before their targeted ad rollout.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I love YOUR post!

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 19 points 5 months ago

Same way Uber lost money for 7 years straight. Investors.

[-] Taalen@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

That doesn't look like an ad, but a section in a (probably) tech magazine where they introduce useful or interesting websites to their readers.

[-] courval@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

It's a trap!

[-] Creosm@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Oh the irony

[-] yamapikariya@lemmyfi.com 11 points 6 months ago

Alternate reality

[-] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago
[-] hemmes@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Oh how the dystopian tables have turned

[-] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 5 points 5 months ago

I was in university then and we actually used Yahoo mostly to learn about how to search (back then with boolean operators and other things). I don't recall covering google. I think maybe we had Alta-Vista as well? Of course, Archie, Veronica, etc. were still taught as well.

[-] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago

I saw a post that said the same thing about duckduckgo a couple of days ago

this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
976 points (100.0% liked)

internet funeral

6912 readers
1 users here now

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤart of the internet

What is this place?

!hmmm@lemmy.world with text and titles

• post obscure and surreal art with text

• nothing memetic, nothing boring

• unique textural art images

• Post only images or gifs (except for meta posts)

Guidlines

• no video posts are allowed

• No memes. Not even surreal ones. Post your memes on !surrealmemes@sh.itjust.works instead

• If your submission can be posted to !hmmm@lemmy.world (I.e. no text images), It should be posted there instead

This is a curated magazine. Post anything and everything. It will either stay up or be lost into the void.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS