731
I'm with McCoy here (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/tenforward@lemmy.world

Sorry about that ridiculous watermark.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 81 points 5 months ago

The fact that two Rikers existed is all the proof I need to be full Luddite. Save your death machines for the next person, thanks!

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

And they treat the one on the planet like he's a copy when he'd logically be the original with the one on the Enterprise being the duplicate.

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

They are both copies. They explain that the guy operating the transporter was losing him, so he used a second beam to try to compensate. On beam made it through, the other bounced off the st uff in the atmosphere that was causing the problem and rematerialized him on the planet. I'm pretty sure this explanation was in the episode in order to establish that both Rikers are equally real.

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Except that that explanation means Tom was made with the original Riker materials and Will was made from matter reserves on the ship using the original Riker as a template.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] eldavi@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

i always felt that it was wrong that they gave the riker that got out a promotion; but wouldn't do the same thing for the riker that didn't get out even though he was the one who paid the price for his heroism while the other riker simply got lucky and both did the same thing that earned that promotion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 64 points 5 months ago

This is why I want monsters Inc style linked door-wormholes. It's less... Reconstituted flesh.

Less room for duplicates, more room for halfsies I guess

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

I'll take the small chance of being cut in half over the guaranteed murder box, thanks.

[-] Baggie@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 months ago

Good news, I'm pretty sure holes in reality are more likely than the reconstitution beam.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Skua@kbin.social 40 points 5 months ago

Existential Comics' "The Machine" feels highly relevant here

https://existentialcomics.com/comic/1

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] sxan@midwest.social 32 points 5 months ago

Everyone remembers his irascibility in the film but ignores that, for the three original years, he transported without complaint in nearly every episode. And it was a reliable, proven technology that apparently only got worse and more twitchy a couple of decades later.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

About the time O'Brien was born.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

I think I've explained this too many times to do it again, but: teleportation doesn't have to be "destroy and reconstitute" any more than going through a door necessitates killing you and reconstituting you on the other side of the door. The key is establishing continuity of your mind across the intervening space, which is mostly an engineering problem.

[-] vithigar@lemmy.ca 20 points 5 months ago

Star Trek transporters are "destroy and reconstitute" though. They are explicitly described as such. The whole Thomas Riker situation even requires it to be the case.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Star Trek just throws all its rules out from one episode to the next. The Star Trek franchise is the McDonalds of sci-fi; you don't choose it because it's good, you choose it because it's available.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DogWater@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I think we are still in the realm of a physics problem for teleportation lol

Fusion is an engineering problem. the sun does it. We've done it. We just suck at it.

Teleporting is not possible as far as we know ....unless I missed something huge in science news

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Typical McCoy. Calls turbolifts elevators and transporters teleporters.

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

"Old man yells at matter stream."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

I still can't believe we are this many years out from ebaumsworld and still people are putting fucking watermarks on memes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dullbananas@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 months ago

Me with brain chip implants, especially those with non-libre software

[-] the_beber@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago

Not only that, but they‘re also literal bombs. Remember E=mc^2? With a technology capable of converting 100% of matter into usable energy, you‘d have a pretty scary bomb bomb.

[-] bigboig@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 5 months ago

"But what if it kills you, but no one can tell?"

this is pascal's wager for nerds

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sundray@lemmus.org 17 points 5 months ago

I think McCoy was more afraid of accidents than existential factors.

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

All that could have been avoided by having a drop pod launched to the surface containing a mechanical avatar. The crew member just sits down in a chair to remotely control the avatar using an FTL link for instant control. Of course the avatar has a hologram projector so it looks exactly like the crew member. But that would be too safe and not dramatic enough.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Katzastrophe@feddit.de 17 points 5 months ago

Tbh the same logic can be applied to sleeping. If our consciousness is akin to computer ram and sleep is the brain cleaning up that ram, how can you know that when you wake up you're still the same person that went to sleep last night?

[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

This is a cool thought because it's not about being copied but more about the Ship of Theseus.

Why do we sleep?

"The body needs sleep."

No, the body needs rest. Our physical self just needs down time and relaxation and then it's good to go again. Our BRAIN needs sleep. Specifically, REM sleep to process all the new data that was taken in. Converting short-term memories into long-term memories. Sorting and organizing data. A kind of hard drive defragmentation.

Our sleep is normally presented like a sine wave. We regain base level consciousness cyclically several times a night, which is why we dream. Which is why our dreams are usually tied to recent memories. The more good sleep we get, the more our brains can deal with recent experiences.

When we wake up, it's like rebooting a device after an OS update. It's us, but with altered software. We are as much the person we were yesterday as the Ship of Theseus is still the Ship of Theseus after having pieces fixed and replaced. The whole is who we are, not the bits that changed.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] lengau@midwest.social 14 points 5 months ago
[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 12 points 5 months ago

"Devil's Elevator" hahahaha, have an upvote

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 months ago

I'd like to know or see a Star Trek series about the development of Star Trek technology.

Like the history of flight or the first ancient sea captains, .... when it comes to the history of the humble teleporter, how many freakin people did they have to reconstitute, recombine, turn into a puddle of goo, teleport into a wall, remove their brains, reconfigure their organs, teleport into a bulk head or reanimate into empty space before they perfected the technology.

[-] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 months ago

*"...I teleported home one night, With Ron and Sid and Meg. Ron stole Meggie's heart away, And I got Sidney's leg." *

Teleportation Blues, Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stinerman@midwest.social 11 points 5 months ago

The thing about transporters is that if we had them right now, people would use them for everything. Transport me to the toilet. Transport the TV remote into my hand. Transport a fork into my hand. People would never get out of bed.

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 months ago

Transport the waste out of my bladder right into the matter recycler.

Transport the nutrient and vitamin mix into my stomach.

Transport the fat from my body.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago
[-] Steve@communick.news 11 points 5 months ago

I never understood the problem people seem to complain about here.
A perfect copy, is perfect. There's no detectable, no measurable, no identifiable difference.
So what are you talking about? Unless you don't think perfect is actually perfect.

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 months ago

Because it's still a copy, so you still die. Imagine if there was a delay between the copy being produced and the original being destroyed, long enough for them to see each other if transported within the same room.

To Be

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 10 points 5 months ago

But is the copy me from my conscious point of view? I don’t care that it looks the same externally. Will I still be inside the ship?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago

From an outsider's point of view sure, but does your consciousness dies when dematerialized, only to have a copy of your consciousness going on in the rematerialized body as if nothing happened?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

The best take on transporters was in a 'Buzz Lightyear' cartoon.

Buzz tells his team that a scientist has developed a transporter. The farm boy says that it sounds like a great invention; with a transporter the ship can stay up in orbit and the crew can teleport to the surface.

Everyone just looks at him like he's an idiot.

[-] ImminentOrbit@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I liked the method described in "Old Man's War." It wasn't teleporting exactly, but the premise could be used here too. The consciousness of the person was being transferred to another body and during the process, The singular consciousness was aware of being in two places for a short while.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 9 points 5 months ago

Dark Matter (the other one: the Canadian sci-fi show) had something called Transfer Transit kinda like that.

They scan you and rapidly grow a clone at your destination with all your memories. Clone has like a 3-5 day lifespan, but is otherwise "you". It goes and does whatever you planned to do at the far end.

The main you stays behind and does whatever until the clone returns to a Transfer Transit pod on the far end. It's memories are then uploaded to you and the clone disintegrates. You now " remember" everything the clone did on your behalf as if you did it personally.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago

Not to mention, if we have the technology to construct human bodies and minds on the other side of that teleporter, what is to stop them from modifying the machines to change your brain (or body). I have lost any trust I once had in any government or company to believe them if, hypothetically, they tell me they have the know-how to change my opinion of Coca Cola upon reconstruction.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 months ago

Dunno if this is just the millennial in me but I'd use one even if I was directly told it clones and kills me. Better than TSA.

Also I don't fear going to sleep or general anesthesia.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

I am not. You are already a process, a continuous state of going in and out of existence.

And yet despite this being philosophically sound my student loan people do not agree.

[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I'd prefer the interdimensional travel they use in Earth: Final Conflict.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
731 points (100.0% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3694 readers
664 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry or fascism. This is a Star Trek community. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable, neither is supporting people who actively want to kill those groups. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS