668
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz

The university should be the place demonstrating socioecological change, serving as a site of experimentation and praxis (see Dunlap et al., 2023). This, however, could not be further from the truth. Beside advancing technologies of digital, political and military control (Chatterjee & Maira, 2014), not to mention genetic dissection and animal vivisection—or some degree of this (Pellow, 2014)—universities fail to enact real examples of socioecological of renewability and sustainability. How come universities are not overflowing with agroecology, permaculture and forest gardens on and inside universities? How come universities are not self-generating their own electricity needs through wind, solar and other lower-carbon infrastructures? We, unfortunately, are witnessing the opposite at university campuses around the world.

https://www.grassrootsjpe.org/view/resource.php?resource=26

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kallioapina@lemm.ee 132 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is also a big reason why I'm few weeks from submitting my masters for inspection, and 90% of my references/sources are from Annas Archive / Zlib. Our uni library, in supposedly rich nordic country Finland, just cant afford all the licenses. Luckily all our professors and researchers are in on the "secret", but its just a fucking joke.

Most of the world economy is on the same fucking joke. Just leeches upon leeches upon leeches... And so few people giving anything usefull to the world. I fucking try, but god damn these useless money leeches in the middle try to make it hard as possible. Fuck. So fucking angry, but what can I do but try to minimize the damages I do on my personal part.

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 62 points 10 months ago

Keep screaming. People are not informed on this.

[-] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 10 points 10 months ago

They are but until "apes together strong" takes peoples minds nothing will change. People feel powerless to do anything so companies just get away with it

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 4 points 10 months ago

That's why we can't shut up. :)

[-] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 21 points 10 months ago

Good luck on this final push; take care of yourself where possible and stay angry at the things that deserve it

[-] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago
[-] Kallioapina@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

Core has also been quite helpfull in open access science.

https://core.ac.uk/

[-] daddy32@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Such a young person and already so realistic and cynical?

[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 57 points 10 months ago

If the research was conducted with public money, it should be freely accessible by the public, change my mind...

[-] MBM@lemmings.world 31 points 10 months ago
[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 points 10 months ago

Very cool. I know someone, in a fairly small but funded field, who had this sort of requirement


Elsevier had the relevant publication, but they couldn't publish there due to access policies (or it was going to be painful to do so at any rate). So they started their own publication!

I forgot the specifics, but it essentially uses arXiv as the backend, and there's a (commercially available?) frontend that lets editors and reviewers do their thing. "Publishing" in this journal is essentially just endorsing an arXiv paper; so it's open access by design.

Really cool stuff. Their field is small enough that iirc they could kinda get critical mass to give Elsevier the finger and adopt this new platform. Warm fuzzy feeling thinking about it!

[-] daddy32@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

You forgot the part where this resulted in giving even more money to the publishers for the "Open access". World is fucked.

[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago
[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 20 points 10 months ago

Buncha dix.

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

so back in the day we needed publishers for distribution. now with the Internet, distribution is easy. but prices only went up

associate editors and referees are unpaid volunteers. typesetting is also mainly done by the authors. but prices are high because the publisher wants to profit.

there are quite a few high quality journals that are fairly priced and published by non profit publishers. these are the only journals authors should publish in ....

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 months ago

also a lot of research work in brazil disallows you to get a second job. you are forced to live with the little money they pay you.

its almost like they don't want there to be research here.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 10 months ago

science is meant to be pirated.

Fuck publishers.

[-] Shameless@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Given the times I've seen news articles and screenshots of poorly vetted published journals. Surely a free open source publisher managed by the academic community can't be much worse? I also don't know shit about the requirements to actually publish so this is probably a naive take

[-] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago

And sci-hub paused adding more papers 😞

[-] alvendam@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What? When? Why? Fuck!

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

One should do a study about much these supposedly open access journals are profiting and who are their shareholders and what not

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

sighs from Eastern Europe

You'd think that they're using the money for prizes for reviewers or as scholarship prizes. What are they doing with all that money? Hosting a journal can't be that expensive.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 10 months ago

It all goes to the C-Suits and any investors.

[-] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Please don't give the overlords ideas. "Minimum wage" as a currency? Talk about dystopian present, damn.

[-] BluesF@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Academic publishing seems like a problem that should be easy to solve. It's a situation where greed is outright making the service worse for everyone, so it seems like a new journal that does things differently (e.g. by not charging researchers) could become wildly successful... So why doesn't that happen? Are there barriers to creating new journals?

[-] wieson@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago

Is that 15 weeks of minimum wage or 15 months?

[-] Tnaeriv@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 months ago

Months. Brazil's minimum wage is BRL 1413 per month, which is around $273.

[-] nintendiator@feddit.cl 3 points 10 months ago

only option is pay out of pocket

Or, ya know, self publish.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's not compatible with the rest of the managerial bureaucracy. And it's not peer-reviewed...

[-] nintendiator@feddit.cl 2 points 10 months ago

Doesn't publishing come after getting your stuff reviewed by peers?

(But even if it's done after, then self-publishing then makes it easier for peers to get your work to review it, which should increase overall quality)

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Reviewers need to be invited and selected to be a good match.

Otherwise, you're just describing preprint servers:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_preprint_repositories

[-] IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

I mean hypothetically yes, but if you're in the sciences tenure, promotion, and wages will be based on publication in high impact factor, for profit journals, so that's not realistic.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

Luckily there are several tools and scripts to bypass paywalls and also those that redirect to the original publication, when the anti-paywall does not work.

[-] Frogodendron@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

Why isn’t Brazil on the list of countries that have their fees waived? Are they on the “rich” side of the spectrum for that to be considered or is there simply no agreement between Brazilian government/publishers?

Yes, I know this is treating a symptom rather than illness itself, but for the sake of today’s science and not the science of tomorrow, at least such an option should be available.

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 3 points 10 months ago

Brazil's approach for fostering innovation and technology is to tax all outside tech at 100%, even though no local industry for the products even exists. I don't have high expectations for them investing in scientific publishing.

this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
668 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

14099 readers
2265 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS