502

Cool Plasmoids on Plasma6:

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 73 points 8 months ago

Technically linux users need third party tools to even boot into a usable OS.

[-] festnt@sh.itjust.works 27 points 8 months ago

if everything is third party then nothing is? my guess is thats the idea at least

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 9 points 8 months ago

Thats why you have RedHat, SUSE, Canonical etc. Legal entities that offer warranty for that random bundle. Insurance that issues will be fixed.

Because if you are just "a racoon digging for free code" you have nothing to request from anyone.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Big akshually vibes

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

difference is you dont need a third party tool to change the thing, if you're unhappy with the thing, you change the thing out itself, you are not stuck with it.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Not if you call it GNU/Linux 🤓☝️

[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Alpine linux

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago

Yes but we get to choose the bloat we want. Windows uses need bloat to cover up the native bloat.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 64 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I love how I can just casually uninstall the entire desktop and install a new one in a few minutes.

Or I can be a complete madman and keep both.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

genuinely curious since I've never tried or even considered it. What happens when you have multiple desktops installed, and assuming it doesn't cause issues why would a person want to do that?

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 43 points 8 months ago

Typically your display manager lets you choose which environment you want from a dropdown menu. It’s responsible for helping you login and taking you to the desktop.

And you can have multiple login screens if you like. I’m not sure why I would typically do this.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 16 points 8 months ago

openSUSE pre-installs IceWM, for example, even if you select a full-fledged DE during setup, so that if your proper DE should ever break, you still have a (very minimal) GUI to do your troubleshooting in.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

That's pretty cool! My immediate reaction to hearing "minimal backup DE for troubleshooting" is wondering why that isn't far more common

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There's no added value to having multiple desktop environments, so almost no one would want to. A lot of applications use DE sensitive configurations and there's potential for conflicts as well as libraries incompatibility. Which can result on paradoxical and bizarre behavior from some graphical apps. It's odd that it happens but it's also not something devs plan or account for, so they aren't even considered bugs. You don't install multiple DEs at the same time unless you're purposefully trying to break something or you don't know better.

The only use case currently is choosing between a DE with X or one with Wayland. But even that one could fuck your system.

For example, opening cinnamon experimental Wayland makes all my flatpaks stop working until reboot. Why? I don't know, nobody knows. But if I keep using Wayland after reboot they work. If I change to regular cinnamon, they break again until reboot, when they get fixed as long as I keep using regular cinnamon. It just be like that.

[-] Album@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 months ago

I don't use linux on desktop anymore but that seems like a major step backwards from 10 years ago where your worst worry for running multiple DEs was the bloat from having to run GTK and QT in a mixed environment.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago

They're making it sound worse than it is, in my opinion.

The problem is that it depends on which DEs you mix and match. Some DEs might do catastrophically bad things for other DEs, whereas others don't cause any problems.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

It's not. Its actually always been like that. Like I said, this kinds of problems are odd and rare. The real issue is that the most help you'd get from the devs teams is a shrug, as it is an unsupported use case. I actually do have both gtk and qt libraries running and they work nicely together.

[-] toothbrush 9 points 8 months ago

I have many DE's installed right now and I never encountered any problems because of it, these issues sound really bizarre. With the cinnamon thing it sounds like cinnamon mangles something while running, but you would still have this problem if you only ever installed cinnamon, so... ¯\_ (ツ) _/¯

[-] poinck@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This is so wrong. Especially the assumption that almost no one would want to have more than 1 DE installed.

Most DEs have their own configuration which don't conflict.

If the maintainer of a distribution has their shit together library incompatibility is no issue. Even on Gentoo you have to ignore everything portage is trying to tell you before you get in trouble.

In the past I even ran two DEs at the same time, sort of. You could start an xfce-panel while using enlightment or good old classic windowmaker.

Later I used Gnome and running my own fork of dwm in a nested Xserver. With wayland this option hasn't gone thanks to Xwayland.

If systemd is correctly set up for it, you get a different seat for every DE, no matter if some seats are hosting the same DE or a different one. I am not sure what will happen if you have several graphical logins with the same user, never tried it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

I got an underpowered gaming laptop I use lxqt when running heavier things, plasma the rest of the time, biggest issue I've found is lxqt dirtied up the desktop with home/trash/documents links

[-] ordellrb@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

You can choose on the login screen, works well, but it gets confusing if the whole Desktop gets installed: example GNOME comes with gnome-terminal even if there is already xterm or KDE Konsole on the system

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 8 months ago

typically you get a dropdown at the login screen :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

Windows used to actually have cool theming capabilities in Windows 98 (And I think ME/2000) what the hell happened to that LMAO

[-] ordellrb@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Monopoly happened

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

No it didn't. Changing a few colors isn't really the same as "cool theming"

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

It did more than "a few colors", compared to today's fancy modern theming systems it was def rudimentary, but with a single click Win 98 would change colors, the cursor, the entire sound pallette and even button images iirc. I was particularly fond of the Computer theme and the Space theme lol

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

You're right except button images. That wasn't a thing. But you could change fonts which I'd forgotten. My point though is that the things they let you change were pretty limited.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] dan@upvote.au 3 points 8 months ago

In my opinion, it peaked in Windows XP. XP's themes were way more customizable than 98's. You could patch the uxtheme DLL (disable the signature check) to allow third-party themes.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

I miss the sound themes. The animal theme was really cool with its sounds.

[-] blackjam_alex@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

More like officially supported modding. For example, Gnome extensions are third party add-ons.

[-] cupcakezealot 8 points 8 months ago

this acts like rainmeter and stardock windowblinds weren't vastly superior ....

[-] lastweakness@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

They weren't though... I used to love the stardock stuff especially. But they were objectively inferior. I also couldn't run hyprland or sway with nearly every part replaced by an unconventional replacement like the friggin notifications daemon for example. Even on Plasma, i could literally replace the entire shell. And even on GNOME, I could add an "extension" that essentially replaces the GNOME workflow.

As much as I enjoyed those days of windows customisation, it was far too shallow compared to what i can do on a Linux setup. Will i do all that though? Probably not, i like my Plasma setup as it is right now.

[-] cupcakezealot 3 points 8 months ago

i'm talking about being vastly superior to the built in theme options in windows since it implied third party tools were "bloat" instead of being genuinely useful.

[-] fluckx@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

The thing that tilted me the most on macbook was that I had to install a 3rd party tool to have shortcuts to move apps between screens. SERIOUSLY?

It's a free app, but still.

[-] Juice64@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Got to remember that most windows and Mac users aren’t even aware of the bloat. I don’t know how many times I’ve gotten on my mom’s pc that she said was going slow and found countless extensions, tool bars and off brand programs installed. Between her being in her 50s and her grand kids hopping on and clicking everything, nobody knows or gives a damn.

[-] joneskind@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Linux users using Gnome Tweaks to make their PC look exactly like macOS.

When I'm not working on my Mac I enjoy the sheer simplicity of Sway

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 3 points 8 months ago

Tweaking gnome to look like macos is easy. Turning kde to look like macos? Now that's dope.

[-] joneskind@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Cairo + global-menu and a little bit of taskbar rearrangement should do the trick

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 months ago

Why would you want that? Gnome is way better

[-] whome@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago

Why is everybody so obsessed with tweaking and customizing an OS?! My systems are pretty much vanilla and apart from the file browser I hardly use any active OS features.

[-] Nisaea@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 8 months ago

Because it's fun.

I like having fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

I've been running Linux for almost thirty years. Back in the day i would customize everything. Now I basically install and run it stock.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HStone32@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

"I need a computer that jUsT wOrKs"

[-] HEXN3T 3 points 8 months ago

I sure do love installing KDE Plasma however I want

[-] grimaferve@fedia.io 1 points 8 months ago

I remember in XP, Vista and 7 using the UXtheme dll mod to get third party themes. First the loss of the sidebar then the drop-off of themers. I skipped 8 and by 10 I'd had enough. Didn't really come back to theming until I made the jump to full-time Linux in 2022. Theming support being there by default in KDE is amazing. I miss the 2007-2018 themes but Oxygen keeps me happy for now.

[-] dan@upvote.au 2 points 8 months ago

The uxtheme thing was great because it was pretty powerful, and since it was just the standard theming system built-in to Windows, it was more reliable than theming systems that required third-party apps (WindowBlinds being the most common one).

Apparently uxtheme patching still works on Windows 11, but I haven't tried it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
502 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

22212 readers
491 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. 🇬🇧 Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS