459
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 158 points 1 year ago

These companies should be forced to pay big money to each and every person affected by these breaches. Not like $120. Like $10,000 per. Teach them real lessons

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 55 points 1 year ago

But instead they will be fined, and they will pay that fine to the government.

[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago

They just pay up and do it again. It's a business expense, not a punishment.

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 2 points 1 year ago

I expect they get themselves insured for it

[-] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 11 points 1 year ago

and then, us as the consumer will pay for the fine as well

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

Even $120 would be amazing. I just got an email that said too bad. I just bought a monitor cause that’s where they sold it. Idk why they have to save my info. I just want to pay for the product. If it was up to me, they would delete all my info immediately. They only need to record when the serial number was sold anyway.

Oh if only I was European.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Instantly makes ~~ransomware~~ [edit 2: my brain was being dumb, I didn't mean literally ransomware, I meant hackers blackmailing companies with the threat of releasing/selling stolen data] far more profitable.

Edit: And heavily discourages self-reporting. There’s a Schneier quote I like: “You can't defend. You can't prevent. The only thing you can do is detect and respond.”

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

If the data is breached, won't we find out anyways once they start selling it?

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. But the penalty does modify the cost-benefit analysis. If a hacker demands $5m or else they will release stolen data, you might be more inclined to YOLO the 5 mil on the 1% chance they're an honest hacker if the penalty for the breach is $50bn.

[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

In the case of this breach, I'd be happy with a $10 payout, the consequences for me are actually pretty low here. That being said, I think we'd be lucky if Dell had to pay more than $0.50 per person, and that money will probably go to a lawyer's fees, not me.

[-] Woozythebear@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

I'm so glad we banned tik tok so my data doesn't fall in the wrong hands.

[-] xep@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

I know you're being flippant, but it's worth noting that there is a considerable difference between a company getting hacked like this and an app with unfettered access to the cluster to sensors that we've got in our pockets.

[-] Woozythebear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, hackers having my data is so much better than China....

[-] Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

The thing with tik tok isn't only with the data China can gather from US residents. It's also how they can use that information to influence the populace and send them propaganda, for example influencing the election results.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They can also gather information about our politicians who use it and blackmail them to get what they want

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Woozythebear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ok, what information could they gather and how would they use that to influence an election?

[-] Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

The section Methods on the Cambridge Analytica wiki page explains it pretty well. While it's not proven to be able to directly influence voting, it's effective at swaying people's opinions and emotions about subjects.

[-] Woozythebear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So it's all bullshit then, got it.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago

The ban is a dumb policy, but you’re daft if you think the security implications are at all similar.

TikTok was caught injecting a keylogger into their in-app browser and their response was “Well yeah, but we promise we’re not using it.”

[-] DriftinGrifter 2 points 1 year ago

doesent literraly every website with autocomplete search queries do this?

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

No. This is analogous to cross-frame scripting.

So imagine you go to tiktok.com and you click on a link to bestbuy.com/cool-product-i-want-to-buy. But instead of taking you directly to bestbuy.com/cool-product-i-want-to-buy, it keeps you on tiktok.com and just opens an iframe with a keylogger injected into it.

So then when you enter credit card info into the bestbuy.com UI, the tiktok.com JS can see what you typed.

(This scenario is largely impossible these days, due to modern browser security.)

The difference is that if you witnessed this kind of XFS in your desktop browser, you might notice it because the location bar still says tiktok.com, because you never actually left the site. But in a mobile in-app browser, you don't need an iframe. You can inject JS directly into the browser itself, making it invisible to the user. As far as you can tell, you're on regular ol' bestbuy.com, not a modified version of it.

[-] DriftinGrifter 2 points 1 year ago
[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

lmao, you asked.

I'm not a security expert, but my tech career has involved a lot of automated testing in weird scenarios, including iframe-based Facebook games and browser-based mobile apps. Automated tests face a lot of the same challenges that a malicious third-party would, so I know a little bit about how to get past them -- or rather, how to deliberately create vulnerabilities (in the dev build of your system) so that your tests can get past them.

Edit: I am curious why someone downvoted me on that one though. I can understand how my comment about the ban being dumb but TikTok also shipping a keylogger could anger people on one side or the other. But just explaining how in-app browsers revive a security problem that's been long-solved in standalone browsers?

[-] leds@feddit.dk 35 points 1 year ago

Got this:

Hello, Dell Technologies takes the privacy and confidentiality of your information seriously. We are currently investigating an incident involving a Dell portal, which contains a database with limited types of customer information related to purchases from Dell. We believe there is not a significant risk to our customers given the type of information involved.

What data was accessed? At this time, our investigation indicates limited types of customer information was accessed, including:

  • Name
  • Physical address
  • Dell hardware and order information, including service tag, item description, date of order and related warranty information
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

~~Hello, Dell Technologies takes the privacy and confidentiality of your information seriously. We are currently investigating an incident involving a Dell portal, which contains a database with limited types of customer information related to purchases from Dell. We believe there is not a significant risk to our customers given the type of information involved.~~ Sending you this single message satisfies our legal disclosure requirement. Beyond that, we have no actual intention of fixing this, providing you with a meaningful compensation for the breech or really doing anything different at all truthfully. Fuck you.

[-] fossphi@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

So people know how expensive a computer is at the address. What could go wrong

[-] IHawkMike@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Right, because international hackers are going to mobilize boots on the ground across the world to steal your fucking Optiplex.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it's more likely that an attacker would make a fake collections call if you bought something really expensive, especially if they can prove you bought on credit or something. A little ChatGPT and you'd have a targeted script to use.

[-] the_artic_one@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

The leak didn't include phone numbers or emails but I'm sure there will be attempts at spear phishing businesses since they can figure out the business name from the physical address.

It's trivial to get phone numbers given an address in most cases.

[-] Coldgoron@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Can’t have my ssn stolen if it has already hit the dark web.

[-] bruhduh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

5d chess move right here

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Dude, you’re getting a delinquency letter.

But, like, we paid our fine. Sorry 🤙

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Expect a ton of Indian people calling pretending to be Dell Support.

[-] Eeyore_Syndrome@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

Somebody needs to make a "Dell Dude meme" about this.

[-] Wilshire@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Dude, you're getting your identity stolen!"

[-] LifeLikeLady@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They emailed me earlier about it... Good thing I've only ever bought a monitor from them.

[-] jadedwench@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Sames. They make sweet monitors.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Even then, why do they need to store my personal information? After delivery, my info should be wiped besides the date of purchase for said serial number.

[-] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago

What fuckin data is dell even getting and how?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Holy fuck. Is that like all their customers?

[-] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 5 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
459 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73370 readers
4375 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS