633
Moon dust (mander.xyz)
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 95 points 2 years ago
[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml 46 points 2 years ago

I’m pretty sure everyone is allergic to having their skin and lungs rubbed with mica.

[-] verdare@beehaw.org 12 points 2 years ago

Yeah, moon dust is basically microscopic shrapnel. No one should be breathing that shit in.

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

Moon dust is functionally a lot like asbestos. It is composed of a sizeable amount of tiny shards of rock that aren't great for your lungs.

[-] stiephel@feddit.de 22 points 2 years ago

Yea, you should really consider that before breathing on the moon

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Any lunar dust that they made contact with would have found its way into the lunar module for them to breathe in and be exposed to.

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 years ago

Isn't moon dust just sand?

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 84 points 2 years ago

It's sand that has never been exposed to water or oxygen. This leaves various reactive chemicals on the surface that would normally be broken down. The lack of water also means the particles haven't been smoothed off as much. They are sharp and spiky.

The combination of these effects makes the dust quite unique, compared to earth dust.

[-] Catoblepas 17 points 2 years ago

It also reportedly smells like gunpowder.

[-] prayer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Burned or unburned? They are two distinct smells.

[-] Catoblepas 8 points 2 years ago

Burned, according to the astronauts. I don’t know if the exact mechanism has been published anywhere, but since spent gunpowder has been oxidized I imagine that’s what’s going on with the dust as well.

[-] vind@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

50% SiO2, 15% Al2O3, 10% CaO, 10% MgO, 5% TiO2 and 5-15% iron

[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago

And 100% reason to remember the name.

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 10 points 2 years ago

All those oxides but the iron is pure? SUS.

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sand, but sharp due to a lack of water erosion, and formed mostly from asteroid impacts and thermal cycling. So it's more like glass dust. It's possible it has similar effects on lungs as asbestos, but we don't know for sure.

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago
[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago

Jack Schmidt = Anakin confirmed.

[-] rustydomino@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

More like Jack Schmidt = Cave Johnson

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The sample size is at least a little bit bigger...

Some guy stole moon rocks (presumably still had moon dust on them) to bang his gf on them.

[-] salarua@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 years ago
[-] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Roberts was sentenced to more than eight years in prison for his role in the Moonrock caper, as well as a separate offence of stealing dinosaur bones from a museum in Utah.

I'm afraid to ask what he did with the dinosaur bones!

[-] credo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Boned on bones, obviously.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Thank you so much

[-] halvar@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

Not being allergic to finely graded rocks that have been bathing in radiation for billions of years seems more unlikely.

[-] Raxiel@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

So, if someone were to crash the moon into the earth to stop it escaping, as many as 1/12 of the population could experience a reduced quality of life?

Might need to consider not doing that I suppose.

[-] gitamar@feddit.de 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] grubberfly@mander.xyz 7 points 2 years ago

what'd be the smallest sample size that would yield a relevant result?

30? 1000?

[-] Gonzako@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago
[-] Shellbeach@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Can we not... Just... Bring back some moon dust?

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

There's the possibility of contamination if we do that.

[-] flora_explora@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Well, if humans were a homogeneous population maybe that could work. But just imagine the huge number of factors at play here. Like, demographics, cultural background (different exposures & different allergy rates in general I would guess), genetic susceptibilities, individual lifestyles (e.g smoking) and probably a lot more! Even a sample size of 1000 seems pretty small to test for general human allergy rates to moon dust. If you were talking about just one population of humans, e.g. the US, you would certainly need more than 30 but maybe not 1000.

[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago
this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
633 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

17269 readers
403 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS