298
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

It makes sense when random people or celebrities make these demands...

But Pelosi is a senior member of our government, she doesn't have to just make these public statements.

Cutting off aid until Bibi is about of power isn't just possible, compared to other ways we've kicked genocidal maniacs out of power it's down right cordial.

We need the people who do have the power to get shit down, actually put the work in and do it.

[-] Rottcodd@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

It's so bizarre to me that a politician saying that the grotesquely corrupt psychopath in charge of an apartheid nation that's carrying out a genocide on one front and an incremental land grab on another while they also try to provoke yet another nation into attacking so they can play the victim as they continue their egregious crimes "should resign" is a newsworthy event.

The world is in the hands of insane monsters.

Well, it’s newsworthy because, while Pelosi is hella old, she hasn’t technically retired yet. And politicians actually saying or doing things that are morally defensible usually comes after retirement (unless you’re part of the progressive wing that the DNC is basically trying to shut down altogether).

[-] Rottcodd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly, and that's bizarre.

We actually live in a world in which politicians are expected to be dishonest, amoral and corrupt fuckwads and the few in Washington who aren't are outcasts even in their own party. And we just accept that. It's insane.

[-] MysticDaedra@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago

Israel isn't apartheid. Anyone saying they are has no clue what apartheid is or means.

[-] oakey66@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Shut up...

Amnesty international says otherwise

So does B'T Selem

Hasbarist trolls running to give cover to Israel committing atrocities in my name and using my tax dollars hold a special place in hell.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago
[-] MysticDaedra@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

HRW is a pretty terrible source, just saying. Also, I've been to South Africa, and I've been to the National Apartheid Museum. Israel may not be perfect, but it isn't even close to being apartheid.

[-] livus@mander.xyz 12 points 1 year ago

It's nice that you visited, but I believe people like Desmond Tutu, who actually lived through Apartheid in South Africa..

There's a reason why South Africa are the ones with the case against Israel in the international courts. They know what this is.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

HRW is a pretty terrible source, just saying.

Why?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/human-rights-watch/

Seems pretty credible..

And this isn't an opinion thing, that Human Rights Watch link goes into great detail on various ways that Israel is an apartheid.

Like, we're not talking about if a band makes good music or not, apartheid has a recognized definition by international bodies....

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 year ago

As soon as he's out of power he's most likely going to prison for corruption, so I don't think he'll be taking her advice.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I agree but also she should resign due to her being old as shit.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

And insider trading

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

So should every politician who is supporting him through funds.

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

She should go back to her headquarters in China.

Mind you, she still isn't actually called for a ceasefire.

Anyway, these fucks are going to scapegoat Netanyahu, orange revolution him out of office all for the oppression of Palestinians to continue, at best, at an only slightly slower pace. But more likely just be replaced by another of the multitude of genocidal maniacs sitting at the Knesset. Fuck these performative asshats.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 20 points 1 year ago

For those of us who don't speak tankie, is the orange revolution reference an indication that the commenter also believes fascist Ukrainians secretly caused the ouster of a Kremlin-friendly President in Ukraine?

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do you have other historically inaccurate ad-hominem riddled irrelevant points to make or do you actually have something to contribute to the discussion?

It's very clear to anyone with a half brain that the Democrat's are scapegoating Netanyahu while completely skirting any responsibility to try and save face in front of the biggest issue they face for reelection.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 15 points 1 year ago

Sorry, I couldn't parse an answer from your reply. What does it mean to "orange revolution" someone out of office?

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 7 points 1 year ago

I suppose this is a reference to Ukraine's Orange Revolution: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_Revolution. Seems to be outing someone out of office because of blatant corruption and voter fraud.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 9 points 1 year ago

Yes, but the comment seemed to use orange revolution as something negative. Like it's a backhanded trick. It wasn't until I started reading Lemmy content that I even ran into people seriously saying the OR was a fraud pushed by the far-right in Ukraine.

I can wait for the commenter to clarify.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 6 points 1 year ago

Well I don't speak tankie either, and I think the revolution ousted a very pro russian government. Which would be a bad thing for a tankie.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

That's why the reference was used negatively. Orange revolutions are something western democracies do to promote hegemony. Or some such tankie bs.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

I used to think she was an idiot for that, another user on Lemmy challenged me and I looked into the comment further.

The protestors she told to go back to China were members of Code Pink.

Code Pink used to be a legitimate feminist anti-war protest group, but after the co-founder married Neville Roy Singham in 2017, a Maoist who has supported pro-China groups across the world with funding ties to the CCP and now accounts for 25% of the groups funding, the group has suddenly removed all historical complaints against China and stopped saying anything critical of China.

tl;dr: This group is openly an verifiably funded by China, and repeats Chinese talking points.

In closing, fuck Nancy Pelosi and her governments support for funding Israel, but she was right on this single issue.

Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_Pink

https://chinamediaproject.org/2023/08/16/code-pink-code-red/

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Booohooo some rich person turns out not be aligned with western hegemony. Also the group isn't funded by China isn't funded by Roy Singham, who happens to align himself with Chinese interests. I bet you had no issues with Soros and the NED funding protests in Hong Kong though, that's totally cool and based right?

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I said that.

Roy Singham is funded by China, and he uses that funding to fund pro-China propaganda groups across the world.

The rules of this community prevent me from saying what else I want to say about tankies, so I’ll leave this conversation here as I’ve been deleted too many times before.

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think Singham, who made nearly a billion dollars selling his company, needs any money from China.

The guy is pretty based though, thanks for proving that point.

[-] Timbits@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

No “nearly a” billionaire is based.

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I think a nearly billionaire who stopped making money and is now blowing all of his money financing incredibly based people, is in fact about as based as a near billionaire can be. Cause one day, and at this rate probably not that long into the future, he will not be any anymore.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Didn't they have like 7 elections in a row over the course of 5 months and Bibi finally won as was like "this closest election ever in the history of Israel gives me the mandate to rule over it like a total dictator, time to gut the judges, throw the ultra-orthodox into the military, appoint my friend Lieberman head of a secret anti-protest milita and genocide gaza!"

Shit he even lost a few of them but no one could form a government. I hear on the news that some people were just voted Likud just to end the forever stalemate.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Israeli left had been weak since the Yom Kippur War.

Edit: damn autocorrect

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

First off, I agree.

Secondly: lol never happening

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

That would probably be for the best.

[-] MysticDaedra@fedia.io 8 points 1 year ago

The man who would replace Netanyahu, Benny Gantz, considered to be a left-wing Israeli politician, will do the same things that Bibi has been doing... ya know, considering it is a unity government and all. The leftists who think they'll get their way in allowing Hamas to survive by getting rid of Netanyahu really are ignorant.

[-] oakey66@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Those aren't leftists. It's mostly liberals who tell themselves that israel as a ethno nationalist state is perfectly fine but that a prime Minister boastfully taking Israel to it's natural conclusion of ethnic cleansing and genocide is too much. They want it to be done more quietly.

[-] MysticDaedra@fedia.io 4 points 1 year ago

Any sources to back up your claims? 20% of Israel's citizenry are ethnic Arabs and practicing Muslims. Israel has 100% air superiority over Gaza, if they wanted to ethnically cleanse Gaza or the West Bank, they certainly have the ability to do so. But there is no evidence that they want this. None that I've seen at least.

You know who does want to ethnically cleanse another culture/religion from the world? Hamas. Iran, Hezbollah. The Houthis. ISIS. The Taliban. What do all of these groups have in common, hm? Israel is surrounded by militants who have sworn to eradicate all Jews from the planet. In light of that, I think Israel is showing incredible restraint.

Leftists (in the US, the far-left equivalent of the "alt-right") are the ones currently rioting and protesting across major cities and college campuses across the West. Liberals are overwhelming supportive of Israel. Conservatives are overwhelmingly supportive of Israel. It's the radical extremists who want Israel destroyed.

I heard the alt-left just nuked Portland in support of Gaza.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

I heard the alt left conducts satanic rituals and sacrifices babies

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Right, but Netanyahu needs to go, regardless.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

This comment took a hard left turn

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

She also called Palestinian protestors Chinese agents so this is probably because Bibi isn't doing a good job doing PR and blindly listening to Biden and not because he's actively involved in a genocide.

[-] Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Took her far too long to notice.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

fuck that's what im talking about let's go

[-] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Really? I thought people accusing Israel of genocide were russian trolls and chinese spies?

[-] McDropout@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

According to Lemmy they are!

this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
298 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25046 readers
1696 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS