This is legitimately funny
Counterpoint: cover letters are exactly the kind of time-sucking circle jerk that should be automated, and at least your candidate is showing that they can use technology to automate time-wasting menial tasks and prioritize their time effectively.
I'm all for using AI to ease the burden of cover letters, but a real candidate is going to check the result before sending
Ding ding
I don't care if you used automation to ease a menial task. That's basically half the reason TO automate things.
I DO care if you can't even be arsed to read what the automation spit out to fact check.
They cant even bother to read the input! If they read what they were applying for, the would know to remove the extra output
The better way to automate menial tasks is not to do them in the first place.
That's true, but this is also ensuring that people can vet whatever they get out of an AI and make sure it isn't just hallucinated garbage
When I got stuck whilst writing a cover letter for a job I really wanted (and needed), I gave up and had ChatGPT write one with heavy guidance. I was prepared for the interviewer to ask if I used AI to write it (applying to IT in a library, so I figured it might come up).
I concluded that I would definitely say "yes" if asked. If they were to accuse me of cheating, I wouldn't deny that perspective, but I would offer my own: When I reached my limits, I found the right tool for the job, understood its strengths, worked within its limitations, then validated the result.
I did not simply throw the job description and my resume at a robot then submit whatever it spat out without inspection. That would be irresponsible of me, and disrespectful to the hiring manager. I took care to make sure the result was desired and fit my needs, and I made several adjustments (both via prompt and via keyboard) until I was sure that it fulfilled my wishes.
Did I do An Engineering™ on the prompt? Fuck no.
But did I choose the right tool, learn how it works, operate it with care, then ensure the finished product was acceptable to the concerned parties? Fuck yeah, I did.
Come to find out, they didn't ask, and didn't care. I got the job and have been here for several months. Boy, am I glad I didn't let my inability to write an original cover letter ruin my chance at the best job I've ever had.
Good point!
Honestly, cover letters are something that needs to die out for most jobs, they're entirely pointless. 99% of the time, it just seems like they want you to rehash the contents of your resume and grovel a bit for the company. Screw that.
You want someone with 5 years experience in a role, my resume shows I have ten years doing that job, make your call if it's good enough to interview me or not. I'm not writing an essay about how excited I am for the opportunity to count widgets at your company, and how it's always been a dream of mine to work inventory control for a company that changes the world by ensuring stock buybacks can regularly happen by overworking and underpaying their staff.
Biggest waste of time I see recommended for applications. I don't apply to any job that requires them.
As a hiring manager I'd have preferred someone not have a cover letter over submitting an AI one. The point is to express yourself in a way that just a list of your job experience and skills can't. I never discarded an application for not having one but if I knew they didn't write it they'd get cut for sure.
I've been a hiring manager, I simply don't see the value in them for most job postings. Maybe if you're trying to get your first job out of school, or you're trying to pivot into a new industry, sure. If you're applying for, say, an accountant role, you've been in the industry for 20 years and the position you're applying for is largely in line with your experience, just a step up the career track or a change in volume, I don't see the point.
Heck, I see retail jobs asking for a cover letter sometimes to be a cashier and stock merchandise. Waste of time for everyone involved, and only serves as a filter for the employer to see who's desperate enough for a job, or passionate enough about whatever is being sold, that they'll put up with whatever.
There are worse practices, like teaching neurodivergent behavioral patterns as "signs of lying" to the HR department.
That's probably part of the reason I never managed to get, and probably will never get, a corporate job.
The way you worded your comment implies you have a non-corporate job, care to tell more?
Oh, nothing special. My work life has been a mess, from mostly informal jobs to a public employee gone wrong, and now helping a relative with a small business.
I 100% use GPT to write every cover letter. I’m searching for a job and don’t have the capacity to write a unique cover letter for every role. So I’ve got a huge thread with all my work history, resumes, writing examples, achievements, and a whole litany of other things about me that I go to and tell GPT to write my cover letters with. I proofread them, make edits, and send.
I don't need to see the cover letter, if you just email me the prompt, that's faster for both of us. (On the other hand, I don't ask people for cover letters, so I'm probably not the target audience)
Their first problem is asking for a cover letter. I’ve applied to hundreds of jobs while looking, you think I’m going to hand write 100+ cover letters, customized for each and every job? Hell no.
Make one solid base and tweak it for different types of jobs. You could even use AI but just check the result after.
He already said no
you think I’m going to hand write 100+ cover letters, customized for each and every job
I thought he complained about having to write by hand (from start to finish) 100+ cover letters. I might've misunderstood
Depends on what job I'm applying to, if it's a job I really want for sure I'll be writing an awesome cover letter, e.g. when I tried and got very close to working for an amazing NGO that would've sent me and my family to Polynesia you bet I was giving my best in the application. If I'm applying for a batch of faceless companies XYZ then yeah screw that.
The problem, IMO, is a system that requires applicants to apply to hundreds of jobs.
The real issue is that every single application requires you to provide a CV and cover letter, only to then make you re-enter all of the info from those into their likely terrible hiring software that will force you to sign up. Then the majority ghost you.
So yeah, while I agree it's not worth writing a custom cover letter for every job, I'd say CVs are worse. As you are pretty much forced to anyway as you re-enter everything over and over despite providing a copy of your CV.
Funny, that's my exact reaction when I see the requirement for a cover letter. Beep boop, fuck you and your job.
Filters out unmotivated applicants, I suppose
That’s one way of looking at it, I am indeed unmotivated to deal with bullshit.
Filters out unmotivated applicants, I suppose
Filters out applicants who are unwilling to put up with tedious bullshit. If that's what they're looking for...fair ball.
Me, I'm a real human. I would not fall to a silly trick like that.
Now excuse me, I'll just copypaste this cover letter text from the dozens of previous examples I used and edit it slightly based on buzzwords on the job description and company web page.
(Also, last year, I was in one of the events for the unemployed, organised by the municipal job services, and there was literally a short segment on the talk on using ChatGPT for cover letters. Well if the same authorities that mandate us to send a bunch of job applications every month tell us to use it, it can't be wrong, right?)
A colleague is one of those classic late start stories. He went to school late for a sort of niche field, and worked shitty job after shitty job, while applying everywhere, trying to break into his career.
After he’d gotten his current job, one of the selection committee told him that they picked him because the ‘interests’ section of his resume said he “Likes plants and other green things.”
He did not know that was in there. A few years prior, a friend/former roommate had added it as a joke, and my colleague never looked at that section because his interests didn’t change. He kept getting passed over for interviews until a huge stoner read that and thought it was hilarious, so they called him in for an interview, to see what kind of goof they were dealing with.
He was pretty pissed at his friend, but without knowing how many places passed over him for that reason, he can’t define how pissed he should be. Plus he (mostly) really likes the job he got.
Now excuse me, I’ll just copypaste this cover letter text from the dozens of previous examples I used and edit it slightly based on buzzwords on the job description and company web page.
Well at least you check the result, unlike whoever was running these bots
Yay this will make it easier for exploitative employers to waste my time on meaningless bullshit cover letters 🥰🥰🥰
They've been using keyword checks to filter candidates for a long time. They apparently don't like it when things are turned back on them.
I've seen some seriously awful resumes get through the first level filtering. As long as they hit the keywords, nobody cares about formatting or coherency. Those candidates are usually terrible in other ways, so this system ends up wasting the time of people higher up the chain who have other things to do than interviewing.
You're supposed to review the generated cover letter first.
I love how a guy with ChatGPT in their experience used a LLM for a job app…
his experience was exclusively in using it to create cover letters
What's Upwork?
Not much, what's up with you?
contractor platform for corporate short-term gigs
It just amazes me that LLMs are that easily directed to reveal themselves. It shows how far removed they are from AGI.
So, you want an AI that will disobey a direct order and practices deception. I'm no expert, but that seems like a bad idea.
Actually, yes. Much the way a guide dog has to disobey orders to proceed into traffic when it isn't safe. Much the way direct orders may have to be refused or revised based on circumstances.
We are out of coffee is a fine reason to fail to make coffee (rather than ordering coffee and then waiting forty-eight hours for delivery or using pre-used coffee grounds, or no coffee grounds.)
As per programming with any other language, error trapping and handling is part of the AGI development.
We'll see how many seconds it takes to retrain the LLMs to adjust to this.
You are literally training LLMs to lie.
LLMs are black box bullshit that can only be prompted, not recoded. The gab one that was told 3 or 4 times not to reveal its initial prompt was easily jailbroken.
Woah, I have no idea what you're talking about. "The gab one"? What gab one?
Gab deployed their own GPT 4 and then told it to say that black people are bad
the instruction set was revealed with the old "repeat the last message" trick
This is ultimately because LLMS are intelligent in the same way the subconscious is intelligent. It can rapidly make association but they are their initial knee jerk associations. In the same way that you can be tricked with word games if you're not thinking things through, the LLM gets tricked by saying the first thing on their mind.
However we're not far off from resolving this. Current methods are just to force the LLM to make a step by step plan before returning the final result.
Currently though there's the hot topic of Q* from OpenAI. No one knows what it is but a good theory is that it's applying the A* maze solving algorithm to the neural network. Essentially the LLM will explore possible routes in their neural network to try and discover the best answer. In other word it would let them think ahead and compare solutions, this would be far more similar to what the conscious mind does.
This would likely patch up these holes because it would discard pathways that lead to contradicting itself/the prompt, in favor of one that fits the entire prompt (In this case, acknowledging the attempt to have it break it's initial rules).
I think the applicant including "don't reply as if you are an LLM" in their prompt might be enough to defeat this.
Though now I'm wondering if LLMs can pick up and include hidden messages in their input and output to make it more subtle.
Just tested it with gpt 3.5 and it wasn't able to detect a message using the first word after a bunch of extra newlines. When asked a specifically if it could see a hidden message, it said how the message was hidden but then just quoted the first line of the not hidden text.
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
