1230
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 60 points 1 year ago
[-] ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

Fact: 90% of science is made with quartz

... accurate

[-] SeekPie@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

My favourite mineral - potato.

[-] whodatdair 4 points 1 year ago

Russian in origin, if I’m not mistaken

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 45 points 1 year ago

The only way crystals can heal you is if that crystal is salt and your illness is a salt deficiency.

[-] Beryl@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Presenting to the emergency room with hyponatremia, from hypo meaning low, natron meaning sodium, and hemia meaning presence in blood. Low sodium presence in blood !

[-] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

What if I'm bleeding out from a gunshot wound and I have a crystal that is sufficient diameter to plug said gunshot wound?

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Helps not die. Not so much heal.

[-] helpme@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago
[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

I remain skeptical. But you do you.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

To be fair; pretty common.

[-] Venator@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 year ago

You could probably use crystals of other elements to treat other deficiencies too, such as iron? But it's probably easier to just take an iron tablet or eat some food containing iron 😂

[-] Kolrami@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

scholar.google.com is where you want to go.

Also, in my Google-fu experience technical terms work well for finding better scholarly results.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Same experience I have had. Swapping to scholar gets me relevant results that aren't filled with ai gibberish and backwater Hokum. Still have to be careful about study sizes and sigma values and applicability, but miles ahead for at least getting to that being my issue.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] lemmyman@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Yes this is absurd, but it's a (serious) scientific community issue, not a search engine issue.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Putting scientific in the search criteria should redirect there then.

[-] Kolrami@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

At the very least, it might be nice if they ask you if you want to go there instead.

On the other hand, I'm just happy that Google Scholar hasn't gotten completely destroyed by SEO yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

What’s the scientific term for rocks?

[-] Kolrami@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

In fairness, I was thinking specifically of plants. I expect better results when looking up "S. lycopersicum" than "tomato".

An example off the top of my head is saying pyrite instead of fool's gold.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago

I don't even get "did you mean" anymore. Just, we found more examples of this, so this must be what you meant.

Even DuckDuckGo straight-up tells you "we didn't find many results containing [blank]." Yeah. That's why I wrote [blank.]

[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago

"There are a lot of results that aren't what you're looking for."

Okay, great?

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Right? Literally didn't ask.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Driveway4964@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For those looking for some Google alternatives:

  • Qwant has a custom indexing strategy and is okay
  • Brave Search ~uses Google and Bing~ EDIT: they use a custom index too
  • Startpage uses Google and Bing and it’s prettier than Brave IMO
  • SearX is ugly but has a lot of sources
  • Perplexity AI tracks the shit out of you but it’s decent
  • Kagi is customizable but it costs you

Feel free to add on any I missed or opinions on these; I haven’t used any extensively

EDIT: Ecosia for trees and DDG for Bing without ads

[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Brave uses its own index. It used to be supplemented with results from other engines but I believe they have now phased that out.

Brave is the best of the free options in my experience, and it supports "bangs" which let's you send your querry to a different engine (typing "how far is it to the sun !g" will pass the search to google. Duckduckgo also supports bangs), this is especially helpful for image searches (!gi for google images) since braves image search sucks dogshit 😅

Quant seemed like the second best free option in my experience. Some people don't like brave as a company for various reasons, so quant may be a good option for those folks. Its my understanding that Mozilla has worked with quant in some way, which is kinda neat.

Both have their own index making them a sustainable/viable option going forward, where meta search engines that use other engine's results are at the whim of those they fetch the results from (but may provide better results by piggybacking off a larger successful engine)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] wieson@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Ecosia uses the money they generate with ads to plant trees 🌿 (I think it's bing on the backend)

[-] Driveway4964@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Added! I love the mission

[-] Gluten6970@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Brave Search does not use Google and Bing. And why did you skip over DDG?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hanke@feddit.nu 4 points 1 year ago

Kagi user here.

Bought a month to test it and then went for a year immediately afrer. I really like it!

[-] Driveway4964@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I’ve had similar sentiment from other users! I’m inclined to give it a shot

[-] Lojcs@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Qwant was good until they georestricted it for no reason

[-] kaputter_Aimbot@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

MetaGer is a metasearch engine focused on protecting users' privacy. Based in Germany, and hosted as a cooperation between the German NGO 'SUMA-EV - Association for Free Access to Knowledge' and the University of Hannover, the system is built on 24 small-scale web crawlers under MetaGer's own control. In September 2013, MetaGer launched MetaGer.net, an English-language version of their search engine.

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MetaGer


It currently supports the following languages/regions:

Dansk (Danmark)

Deutsch (Österreich/Schweiz/Deutschland)

English (Great Britain/Ireland/Malaysia/USA)

Español (España/México)

Suomalainen (Suomi)

Français (Canada/France)

Italiano (Italia)

Nederlands (Nederland)

Polski (Polska)

Svenska (Sverige)

Source: https://metager.org/lang


There is a TOR-hidden service too:

https://metager.org/tor


It is open source:

https://gitlab.metager.de/open-source/MetaGer


And has other useful features, for example:

[...] you can hide yourself behind our proxyserver just by opening the result anonymously? Use "OPEN ANONYMOUSLY"; this also affects the following links.

Source: https://metager.org/tips


Alternatively I use some SearxNG-instances, preferably hosted in the EU:

https://searx.space

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rustyfish@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Ever died from smallpox while holding a healing crystal?

Didn’t fucking think so 😎

[-] No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago

Why not just use Google scholar?

[-] Gluten6970@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure what exactly you're typing into the search field, but I don't anything like this. The top 3 sites I get for a search of "minerals" are wikipedia, australian museum, and britannica. Typing in "crystals" gets me a healthline article debunking crystal healing, but the following results are some woman's personal store and amazon. Lastly, being direct about wanting scientific articles gets me said articles...

Side note: Why are there so many people pushing for kagi in this thread and skipping over the fact that duckduckgo exists? It's kinda bizarre to see.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

I’ve commented about potential Kagi astroturfing here before.

Seems likely to me.

Their trial - too short for me - felt like a private Google w/improvements.

Now, as a filthy freeloader, my default is DuckDuckGo. I am dissatisfied with the results and !bang out to Google (!g) about half the time. I pray DDG makes use of this data to improve their engine.

tl;dr astroturfing vs. bad results vs. enabling the king of adware

Gosh I need to set up SearXNG! Also “private Google” vibes. Instances here

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Donkter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hell, typing in "scientific data about minerals" gets me a bunch of university geology department websites.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Why are there so many people pushing for kagi in this thread and skipping over the fact that duckduckgo exists?

It's a tide ad

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

This scene live rent free in my head. Also fuckin Crystal Healing types make me look bad when I just think pretty rocks look nice

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

I know right? Completely ruin geology.

[-] jg1i@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Aaaaannd this is why I use Kagi. The site ranking feature let's me block or down rank sketchy sites. (And lets you boost credible sites.)

[-] Wolfram@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

As a gem and mineral collecting hobbyist I feel this pain so, so much.

[-] thrax@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

God I had this issue looking for used wheels for my car. Like, actual wheels to use for a track day, but results showed nothing but simracing threads for used STEERING wheels.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Google decides what you want to see and what you want to see is right wing garbage.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Like multivitamins? (Also contains minerals!)

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

"scientific data about minerals -crystal -healing" should do it

[-] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Excluding crystal from a search about minerals may eliminate more than you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pirating@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I've tried the exclusion Boolean term with Google before, and it really didn't work :(

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
1230 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16088 readers
2573 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS