401
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 106 points 11 months ago

Roku has patented a way to ensure I will never own one of their devices, and I'll do my best to ensure no family or friends do either.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

I e already begun. At least 5 people around me will never buy Roku again. Fortunately, they're tech smart, so it was easy to explain and didn't actually require convincing.

[-] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

I replaced all of mine with Nvidia shield and Walmart onn streaming pucks. It's a better experience in every way (once projectivy is installed) and costs less too.

[-] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Is there a lot of dev going on for the Walmart pieces?

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 77 points 11 months ago

You know, this a good thing. Now nobody else can do it, so I just need to never buy a Roku.

[-] Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 11 months ago

I remember the first time I learned about patent licensing….

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago
[-] PostaL@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Remember when Netflix started showing ads on a paid plan, and everybody was saying they'll quit.

"Haha! Look how Netflix will be thrown into the hole with Blockbuster, so nobody will follow."

So, where are we today? Everybody starts doing it, and Netflix is better than it was then.

Yeah, you'll have to forgive me for not being so sure Roku will eat too much shit over this, and that more companies will not follow.

I see Samsung's boner from here.

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

I fully do not expect Roku to face any consequences except more sales, sadly.

[-] redfox@infosec.pub 5 points 11 months ago

I think it's because people (some) are all talk. We bitch about corporate greed and stuff like this, but when it comes down to it, when you need a new electronic device and one's half the cost, which one do people buy?

The one with ads and that's made by slave wage third world workers, or the one that's twice as expensive?

As a whole, we tend to be garbage and materialistic...

I won't be buying Roku either.

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

Yes, that’s what I’ve learned.

Everything is just about lowest cost and least effort.

Like Twitter, nobody I knew left, despite it being free to do so. Same for Facebook, Reddit, WhatsApp, etc. Each scandal nobody seems to do anything.

I expected people to so watching ad supported Netflix, but it has seen huge growth and is their highest profit source.

I’m disappointed because I know I’m going to get ads everywhere no matter what now, and it’s on every electronic device, which need “secure boot” and whatever else so you can’t circumvent the ads. .

[-] rljkeimig@lemmy.one 43 points 11 months ago

Roku just invented a way for me to never ever give them any of my money.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 39 points 11 months ago

Roku is really just trying to sabotage their reputation at this point, it seems.

[-] d0ntpan1c 37 points 11 months ago

Roku was such an easy recommendation for a long time... Non-complex UI, long support for updates, not owned by google or amazon... Far cheaper than LG and Samsung... (Not that Samsung's UI is anywhere near as easy as roku)

But now I guess thats done. Unless an alternate firmware exists or this doesn't hit older TVs I guess I'll be looking for a new TV... Which is a shame because my current 4 year old roku TV is more than capable.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

Just disconnect your TV ftom the internet right now

[-] d0ntpan1c 2 points 11 months ago

Right, and then not watch YouTube or Netflix or anything on my.... TV... Good plan!

[-] drmoodmood@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

If only there was a way to provide a video stream to the TV without the internet! We'd be saved!

[-] SlakrHakr@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I’ve had my Roku disconnected from the Internet for a while now. I used to use an Amazon Fire stick, and currently use a Google chromecast

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

This is burying the lead. It's not just about showing ads. It is tracking everything you on your TV, whether or not it a roku service

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 18 points 11 months ago
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Oh, I'm stupid

[-] maryjayjay@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Lede has a very specific meaning and is seldom used outside of journalism, lead is perfectly acceptable in common vernacular

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Yes, and this was that very specific meaning and was used in the context of journalism.

[-] maryjayjay@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Language is meant to convey meaning. You clearly understood the meaning, so the language succeeded.

https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2019/lead-vs-lede-roy-peter-clark-has-the-definitive-answer-at-last/

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 5 points 11 months ago

Lmao they already do that. That's not new. They've been snooping on your signals for a while. My parent's TV sometimes shows a pop-up after watching certain things on antenna/satellite

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago

Wtf that's got to be illegal??

[-] Antaeus@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

No Roku products. Gotcha.

[-] nightm4re@feddit.de 13 points 11 months ago

How about no?

[-] kzhe@lemmy.zip 12 points 11 months ago

This is like really horrific but if I'm being honest, it's not going to happen. I think LG did a patent where you had to shout the brand being displayed on ads to skip an ad— and they never did that. This is probably a good thing so that other companies can't use it for a few hundred years

[-] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

There's a big difference though. Making people yell is not the same as an ad being shown similar to a screen saver. Hard to believe but most people will just not care and those who do won't care enough to do much about it. There's a reason ads have become to main stream and normal they're yielding results the companies want.

A great example of how the mass majority of people not caring is look at the reaction to password sharing. Sure many people made a stink yet every single on of the platforms saw growth.

[-] SoleInvictus 1 points 11 months ago

It was Sony, which really surprised me. This definitely sounds like an LG thing.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/sony-patent-mcdonalds/

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago

This is just another really good reason to never buy a Roku TV.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Now, the company is apparently experimenting with ways to show ads over top of even more of the things you plug into your TV.

A patent application from the company spotted by Lowpass describes a system for displaying ads over any device connected over HDMI, a list that could include cable boxes, game consoles, DVD or Blu-ray players, PCs, or even other video streaming devices.

This theoretical Roku TV's internal hardware would be capable of taking the original source video feed, rendering an ad, and then combining the two into a single displayed image.

Among the business risks disclosed on Roku's financial filings from its 2023 fiscal year (PDF), the company says that its "future growth depends on the acceptance and growth of streaming TV advertising and advertising platforms."

If implemented as described, this system both gives Roku another place to put ads, and gives the company another source of user data that can be used to encourage advertisers to spend on its platforms.

It seems as though a Roku TV that was capable of this kind of ad insertion would need more sophisticated internal hardware than most current sets currently come with—this is the same company that feuded with Google a few years back because it didn't want to pay for more-expensive chips that could decode Google's AV1 video codec.


The original article contains 591 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 months ago

I'm really hoping they patent this and lock it away so no one can do it...

I ain't holding my breath though

[-] generic@iusearchlinux.fyi 4 points 11 months ago

Man, am I happy that I stopped using my Roku and switched to an Nvidia Shield TV. I'm also happy that I have a "dumb TV"!

[-] fin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago
[-] avatar@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

Isn't there a Black Mirror episode of this

[-] ryanalexhowell@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

1 step closer to "Drink Verification Can" becoming a reality

[-] irish_link@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I am on board for this.

Patent it and no one else can do it.

Then if you do get or have a Roku TV, just don't add the wifi to your TV. (I know this won't work for the sticks, but for the cheap TV, just don't add that to the wifi)

I know that defeats the point of a smart TV but its a lot cheaper than other screens.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Companies can use it without much trouble. They just need to licence it

[-] irish_link@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

True. Good point.

I was thinking more along the lines that most companies won’t license something unless they absolutely have to. I should have said not ALL the other company’s will do it.

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
401 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

63897 readers
4466 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS