239
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by tsugu@slrpnk.net to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Here's a link to the news. https://e621.net/news_updates

Edit: As people in the comments pointed out, this bill targets all websites hosting porn. e621 just happens to be hosted in Arizona, and it therefore affects them directly.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] barbara@lemmy.ml 65 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is not a witch hunt against that site. It's probably the only site residing in arizona that cares and which you visit. They could easily relocate, which they probably do if the bill is passed.

[-] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 34 points 5 months ago

My bet is that it is a law against porn, and furry porn would be inside that

[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 16 points 5 months ago

They just outlawed 99% of the internet?

[-] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 17 points 5 months ago

It's not outlawing. It's inlawing.

Wait. That's something different. It's regulating.

No wait, that's something different too. It's "but think of the children!!!"

[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 5 points 5 months ago

inlawing

Feel bad for the Arazona guys that don't get to witness the newest porn fad.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

oh, no, not the furries! but honestly:

FIRST THEY CAME FOR THE FURRIES AND I DID NOT SPRAK OUT

[-] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

I mean, laws like this don't just effect furries. It's a privacy issue for everyone in the state, and everyone who who usesa website based out of the state.

[-] ji59@kbin.social 28 points 5 months ago

...PUBLISHES OR DISTRIBUTES MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS ON THE INTERNET FROM A WEBSITE THAT CONTAINS A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF MATERIAL HARMFUL TO MINORS...
Since furry porn isn't harmful, they should be ok.

[-] blujan@sopuli.xyz 39 points 5 months ago

I don't know the site that much, but I know that "harmful to minors" can mean anything.

[-] FilterItOut@thelemmy.club 10 points 5 months ago

Think of the children!

I'll believe they're thinking of the children when they use that phrase to make laws that agree with the environmental groups and governing bodies.

[-] Dirk_Darkly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, like it could mean they'll become furries.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

I'm pretty sure that viewing pornography can be harmful to young children.

Not all "minors", but some people forget that the phrase includes both 17 year olds and 4 year olds in some states...

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 12 points 5 months ago

If a 4 year old is exposed to furry porn, I don't think the culprit is the website.

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

I didn't assign blame to the website, or to anything. I just said that viewing sexual material can be harmful to children.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

Which is the problem with completely open ended language, which is always used in such bills so as to only apply to whoever they want to persecute.

[-] ignotum@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

How much is a "substantial amount"? There's not thaaat much porn on e621, most of it is marked safe
Well a lot of it is...
Well some of it is...
I'm relatively sure i saw one marked safe once...

[-] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemm.ee 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"furry" is like a new terminology for zoophilia?

[-] thyme@leminal.space 79 points 5 months ago

Sort of in the same way that "christian" is new terminology for pedophilia.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 29 points 5 months ago
[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 21 points 5 months ago

Well, I mean…

[-] Gabu@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Bad example, brother.

[-] jak@sopuli.xyz 70 points 5 months ago

Not really. It’s people who enjoy art of personified/anthropomorphized animals. Sometimes it’s sexual, sometimes it involves personas and costumes, sometimes it’s just rabbits in bankers’ outfits. It’s viewed as weird by a lot of people because they assume it’s all costumes and sex, but looney tunes technically also counts, so it’s much more widespread than people identifying with it is.

[-] wahming@monyet.cc 31 points 5 months ago

Lola bunny, creating an entire generation of furries.

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 26 points 5 months ago

Before that it was Disney's Robin Hood.

[-] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 21 points 5 months ago

Furries have been around for a long long looooong time.

Have you seen depictions of the old Egyptian gods? Wild.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

The medieval monks literally made up an entire subspecies of humans with dog heads which they actually believed to be real!

[-] Toribor@corndog.social 1 points 5 months ago
[-] wahming@monyet.cc 10 points 5 months ago

Oh right, how could I forget.

Rip Disney animators, you did your jobs well

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 5 months ago

Robin Hood is a human, isn't he? Or did the film reveal something in the credits?

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 10 points 5 months ago

Disney turned him into a fox boy, for reasons.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 3 points 5 months ago

Ooh-de-lolly~

[-] Gabu@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Also, Lady Marian

[-] satxdude@lemm.ee 24 points 5 months ago

There's almost certainly way more zoophiles among the furry population, but most(?) furries aren't attracted to literal animals AFAIK. Or don't act on it. Uh

[-] Takios@feddit.de 32 points 5 months ago

Zoophiles are generally shunned in the furry communities I know.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago

At this point, I honestly expected it to have been moved to some European country... I mean, what site? Never heard of it.

[-] neutron@thelemmy.club 13 points 5 months ago

I assume there are more issues preventing them from simply relocating to another hosting?

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 months ago

I don't think that matters if they have a business nexus presence in that state. Like if (most of) the developer(s) working on it are in the state they could be subject to the law.

[-] Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

WHY CANT I JUST GOON TO PICS OF KRYSTAL FROM STAR FOX IN PEACE

[-] Titou@feddit.de 10 points 5 months ago

Why not moving the website on another country/continement ? Or even better federating it

[-] kugmo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Obligatory "yiff in hell" post

[-] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago
this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
239 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31253 readers
453 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS