537
submitted 10 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

While Eva Burch spoke on the Senate floor about her planned abortion, almost all of her GOP colleagues found something else to do

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee 150 points 10 months ago
[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 50 points 10 months ago

As is being an asshole. Yet they still get voted into office.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

But we can’t let the Trans Cult of Black Lesbian Gayness win or Jesus will cry!!!!

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 9 months ago

I would support the Trans Cult of Black Lesbian Gayness. However my support is tied up with the Non-Binary Indigenous and Asian Peoples Alliance.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

They get enough support!

Join a real alliance! :p

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago

A Democrat suffered? I'm sure they consider this an absolute win.

[-] DMBFFF@lemmy.world 124 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

She added that, if GOP lawmakers are unwilling to respond to the reproductive health care needs of women, she hopes that voters will get a chance later this year. A push to enshrine the right to abortion in the state’s constitution is well on its way to qualifying for the November ballot.

[-] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 59 points 10 months ago

The GOP is running on a platform of hate and misery. Sadly too many people are fully behind that.

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 27 points 10 months ago

Too many, but not a majority. Important to remember that.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

Specifically, remember that coming up to the election.

And remind your friends to get off their asses and vote.

[-] Nom@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

They're also quite loud, and violent too.

[-] I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world 75 points 10 months ago

What a bullshit country. Absolutely embarrassing.

[-] brlemworld@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago

Their plan is working. We're too busy talking about basic rights while they fuck us over on shit like climate change and education.

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Yes, but I'm not going to let them lynch, deport or force birth on any of my homies. If they want to burn the planet down they're in the same shit we are, but they aren't being effected by the changes to basic rights that they're proposing.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

If they want to burn the planet down they're in the same shit we are.

They have considerably more wealth. If/when food and water get scarce they'll have a considerable advantage, if the current system continues as it is.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

If/when food and water get scarce their money won't mean shit, and the people with nothing left to lose will start looking at the people with a whole to lose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] derpgon@programming.dev 10 points 9 months ago

Hell, they are attacking from all sides. Fucked by bills, groceries, income, taxes, every-fucking-thing. I struggle to grasp if there is a side that isn't being attacked.

[-] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

If there is, don't mention it out loud, or it will be next.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 66 points 10 months ago

Conservative voters clearly want some sort of change but aren't articulate enough to know what it is or eloquent enough to ask. They want someone to get into the government and fuck up the process as an act of protest. But they don't know how to ask for that. Instead they vote in the loud, viscous remains of a person with a fragile ego to be the damage they want done to those who they think wronged them.

Cruelty is the point.

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

The issue is that a lot of people have every good reason to be pissed at the state of the world and to be angry that it isn't changing for the better. The Republicans sure aren't ever going to make things better, but their entire marketing technique is based on harnessing that anger. Democrats, on the other hand, seem to mostly be afraid of even acknowledging that the anger and its causes even exist, and that's one of their biggest weaknesses.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

"We're the Democrats we can't possibly be responsible for any of this frustration and anger. Also have you heard those young people talking about workers rights and not supporting genocide? Ah to be young and naive."

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

Why do we allow our politicians to refuse to do their job and just leave when they don't want to deal with something?

Fucking make them go, listen, debate or kick their ass out.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 9 months ago

I was extremely angry when whatever dipshit was photographed playing angry birds or some shit from behind during a legislative session. My mother (a conservative apologist) tried to excuse the behavior. I told her that if I'd done the same at any number of menial-labor jobs that I'd had, I'd lose my job. Fuck these people.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

Because it's what their constituents want them to do. The voters aren't holding them to a higher standard and will re-elect.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 10 months ago

cant wait until someone proposes a gun ban, on the precedent of the abortion ban. Will be a funny day.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

But that doesn't really make sense, there is no federal law about abortion, the constitution protects gun ownership.ax

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago

yeah, that's my point.

There was a federal law about abortion. We dont have it anymore.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Except it was written nowhere near as explicitly.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] MJKee9@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Technically, both gun ownership rights and abortion rights were based on supreme Court interpretation of the 2nd and 14th amendments (respectively). Given the reversal of the right to abortion under the 14th amendment, an argument could be made that a similar reversal is due for the 2nd amendment as well. The 2nd amendment could simply be interpreted to mean that gun ownership is only a right as part of a "well regulated militia.'. In my opinion, that is the plain meaning of the provision anyway, but I'm just a gun toting liberal that doesn't get sexually aroused or validated by the size of my firearm.

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

A single Republican even bothered to stay to listen to her. Kudos to Sen. Ken Bennett for that, albeit small, act.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 13 points 9 months ago

urging GOP lawmakers to consider the harm caused by the restrictive laws they support. 

The cruelty is the point. This just tells them it's working.

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 9 points 10 months ago

Aren't they all Democratic Senators? I feel like Democrat or DNC and Democratic shouldn't be as interchangeable as they are, it took more effort to type less clearly.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 53 points 10 months ago

This is the influence of Rush Limbaugh. He wanted people to say "the Democrat party" instead of "the Democrats". It sounds like "rat" and "democratic" is generally a good thing.

I actually forgot his name and had to look up "conservative radio host drugs". Brought him up right away.

Always make sure to call it the Democratic party as a FU to him.

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 12 points 10 months ago

Once again, just DNC is easier and much more clear. Plus, if anybody emphasizes the rat in Democratic it doesn't make me think less of democracy it makes me think less of that person.

[-] Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social 16 points 10 months ago

DNC is reserved for the party leadership. The democrats i encounter in the real world may or may not identify with the party leadership (e.x. the democrats i meet over the age of 65 tend to identify with Kennedy, not Schumer.)

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

What exactly is "Democratic" about the Democratic party?

[-] fushuan@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

The name. Same way Republicans work for the people republic just in the name.

As someone outside of the US, the amount of deceptive naming there is in your country is insane.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Any elected politician in the US is part of a democratic republic. So you could technically call them all “democratic” and “republicans.”

It is what it is, that’s why we say “small d,” “capital D,” “small r,” and “capital R.”

The system of government is a democratic republic, the two many parties are the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

None of them are democratic, they're actually all Republican.

...Because they're representatives... In a republic. I was being literal. Yeesh, tough room.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Oh screw off with this. Bernie is republican? Come on man.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Bob_Robertson_IX@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Further, it could be said that they are all republicans who act in a democratic manner.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
537 points (100.0% liked)

News

23824 readers
3004 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS