95

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 68 points 7 months ago

It's really disturbing how popular the notion that rootkit-based anti-cheat is a good thing is on the internet at large.

I love it when a thread like this comes up on Lemmy every single comment condemns EAC's whole anti-cheat model.

Y'all are all right.

[-] Live_your_lives@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

While I am sceptical of rootkit based anti-cheat as well, I am also not a fan of how quickly everyone has jumped to assuming this is EAC's problem and not a problem with Apex Legends, is there some solid evidence for that that I'm just unaware of?

[-] Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works 68 points 7 months ago

"We have investigated ourselves and have found we have done nothing wrong."

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 11 points 7 months ago

That's exactly how i read that. It's so bizzare that they get kernel access to so many computers, and don't even do the thing that they are supposed to do.

[-] Davel23@fedia.io 20 points 7 months ago

Says the company that took three years to implement a shopping cart for their shitty store.

[-] ShaunaTheDead@fedia.io 8 points 7 months ago

I don't know much about anti-cheat development, but it can't possibly be that hard to at least implement something that checks whether a player even could have done something in a certain amount of time which would eliminate a lot of speed related cheats, and for the rest, why not look at data averages to try to weed out cheaters?

I know combing through the data is probably complicated, but so is installing kernel level anti cheat software that has to monitor every single process running on a person's computer.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 7 points 7 months ago

It's cheaper to install malware.

That's all there is to it: cost.

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

So if it isn't a RCE vulnerability, what vulnerability is it?

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Their wording is actually quite deliberate. They say there isn't one being exploited, but they do not explicitly say that there isn't a RCE vulnerability.

It kinda stinks of ass coverage.

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman"

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

Yeah, it stood out to me.

It's always in what they don't say.

If they say it's not a RCE vulnerability, it could still be a privilege escalation vulnerability etc. They avoided saying their software isn't being exploited or "we have seen no evidence our software has been compromised", or "there is no clear signs...".

Which gives a little wriggle room.

this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
95 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16679 readers
763 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS