386
submitted 1 year ago by igalmarino@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.ml
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] koreth@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

Commander Reid Wiseman and his crewmates—pilot Victor Glover, mission specialist Christina Koch, and Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen—were named to the Artemis II crew on April 3.

"Hello, crewmate! What are you doing on this mission?"

"I'm the pilot. You?"

"I'm the Canadian."

[-] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I would love it if they landed on the moon on the anniversary of the original landing. Then I'd share my bday with both anniversaries of the landings.

[-] smosjoske@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

News about the moon always gives me a big what-if sense. Like the series "For All Mankind". It is always with a big regret that I think of what could have been. But excitement about what will be in terms of space exploration. Is there any other explanation besides money and public support for why the moon and space stopped being interesting for governments?

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

There's nothing on it we can use. That's the gist of it. If it has resources we could exploit we'd have been making bases up there since day one.

[-] Chadus_Maximus@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

There are so many asteroids with exotic materials that justify throwing nonsensical amounts of money into furthering space exploration and travel. The problem is being unable to take advantage of those resources in our lifetime. Makes us unwilling to try.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed. You said it well.

[-] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

This makes me so happy

It happened decades before I was born and we haven't bothered to land on a single celestial option since. It's ridiculous. I can't believe no other country even did it since then.

[-] spukas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Why is it ridiculous? What incentive did they have?

[-] baduhai@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

What incentive did they have?

Being cool.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Sooo... the US is, once again, feeling threatened and is planning to send people to the moon to make itself feel better about it - just like last time.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Woopty dooo. The last thing civilization needs is more pointless trips to the moon.

[-] Chadus_Maximus@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

The endgame is asteroid mining. Getting more efficient at space travel allows us to retain more energy for mining operations.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No the end game is the consumption of all resources until we run out and die. Earth wasn’t enough now we need to fuck up the moon

[-] RockyBockySocky@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I get that this is really cool and I love space too, learning about it is great.

But is this really what we should be spending our limited resources on?

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

The US has virtually unlimited resources, they just usually choose to spend them on military and corporate subsidies.

[-] RockyBockySocky@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I meant as a planet, not country

[-] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Space research can help us make better use of resources

[-] kernelPanic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

US prints the reserve money of the world. They basically have unlimited resources. This is better than money spent to kill midlle easterns

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
386 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13018 readers
9 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS