781
submitted 2 years ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

In a YouGov poll conducted between July 25-29, 59 percent of Republicans surveyed said they would prefer a president under the age of 75. Trump celebrated his 78th birthday in June. Forty percent said they had no preference, and just two percent said they would prefer a president over the age of 75.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] echo@lemmings.world 144 points 2 years ago

Sorry repubs... you're going to have to carry this non-viable fetus to term...

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

If the Dems get a reroll, I don't see why the Repubs wouldn't be allowed one, too.

Excited to see JD Vance at the top of the ticket. That should be fun.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 56 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They already had their convention in July. That's why they shit themselves throwing a temper tantrum when the Dems switched, having made an assumption that the Dems wouldn't just not nominate a sitting President.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They already had their convention in July.

Where they made their VP announcement, clearly without an iota of audience testing.

But nothing really stops Trump from withdrawing and ceding the nomination to his VP. Or dying, for that matter.

That’s why they shit themselves throwing a temper tantrum

I suspect that's more just because Biden would have been easier to beat and they're sore over not being able to coast to victory.

[-] prole 15 points 2 years ago

But nothing really stops Trump from withdrawing and ceding the nomination to his VP. Or dying, for that matter.

Besides his crippling narcissism

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

The Democrats still haven't had their convention so they still can make whatever chabge they want. If Trump withdraws, the Republican party as a whole would be withdrawing because they already had their convention and chose their representative. Another Democrat can run against Kamala up until the convention, but once the Democratic party chooses their representative, they would also be locked in.

[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

The DNC and RNC aren't legally bound by the rules they made for themselves. There have been lawsuits in the last 8 years that have established that. They can both do what ever the fuck they want as long as they don't piss off the really big donors.

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago

I was going to suggest that they could just make Vance the candidate. I'm sure that will work out well for them.

[-] cupcakezealot 31 points 2 years ago

repubs had like 10 chances to jettison trump between dropping him from the party, washing their hands of him, supporting the investigations, and voting to impeach... and they rejected all of them to stand by him

[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 years ago

Dems changed to Harris before actually nominating Biden.

Trump is already nominated. Changing at this point would be a much bigger problem for either side.

Even if they somehow did who would take his place? Vance has been very unpopular so far, and they've already had a full primary this cycle; we already know they don't have anyone better than Trump.

Also it would make them hypocrites, not that they care.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Dems changed to Harris before actually nominating Biden.

Show me the election where Harris was at the top of the ballot.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Sooooo.... what's your point?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Trump's free to drop out and let Vance run for Prez

[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago

Almost a fair point; dems may not have rallied around Harris under other circumstances. But she's only formally run one other time and that was four years ago and against a former VP (Biden). Not quite the same situation today.

Also the line you quoted doesn't seem to have anything to do with the point you're trying to make.

[-] bluewing@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

A nomination does not mean that the republican party needs to back Trump. They could have simply chose someone else or even remove him from their ticket. It's all in their control.

A primary is merely to check and see which way the political wind is blowing before the election. And nominations are not written in stone.

[-] prole 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Because they actively participated in the deification of Trump among their base, so they know that taking Trump off the ballot would split the party (possibly irreparably).

[-] jwt@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago

... would split the party (possibly irreparably)

Especially since it's a near certainty that Trump would just continue his presidential bid (as a write-in independent if need be).

[-] echo@lemmings.world 18 points 2 years ago

Because Dems only just now voted and elected Harris. At this point, they are also locked in. Repubs already felated, I mean elected, Cheeto...

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

They can still have a spontaneous abortion. All they need is for old Donny boy to step down or otherwise become incapacitated

[-] echo@lemmings.world 6 points 2 years ago

He's not going to step down, so it will have to be incapacitation which I fully support.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 years ago

I don’t. He needs to lose and spend the rest of his life in prison, along with most of his children.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Because Dems only just now voted and elected Harris.

I'm not sure what election you participated in, but my ballot listed Joe Biden at the top of the ticket.

At this point, they are also locked in

Nothing forces Trump to be president. He can quit any time he wants.

[-] echo@lemmings.world 13 points 2 years ago

I’m not sure what election you participated in, but my ballot listed Joe Biden at the top of the ticket.

So this is an opportunity for you to learn how it really works. Harris was just officially voted to be the Dem candidate and that will be official on Monday.

Nothing forces Trump to be president. He can quit any time he wants.

Oh, he could abort himself, but you know that's never going to happen. The party is stuck with the weirdo until the election, otherwise.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Harris was just officially voted to be the Dem candidate

By whom? Which voter cast a ballot for Harris? Which state did she win?

[-] echo@lemmings.world 9 points 2 years ago

You need to learn how the process works... you're being intentionally ignorant which is a form of stupidity.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You need to learn how the process works…

  • The process selects a candidate

  • The party ejects the candidate in place of a younger, more popular secondary

Me: "Republicans should do this, too"

Lemmy: ten zillion downvotes

Haters gonna hate.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

They're allowed, but he needs convinced to step down.

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
781 points (100.0% liked)

News

37758 readers
2105 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS