781
submitted 4 months ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

In a YouGov poll conducted between July 25-29, 59 percent of Republicans surveyed said they would prefer a president under the age of 75. Trump celebrated his 78th birthday in June. Forty percent said they had no preference, and just two percent said they would prefer a president over the age of 75.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 4 months ago

False. Biden wasn’t willing to step down. He was forced to. Just because he did it doesn’t make him a hero. He deserves to be remembered for refusing to listen to feedback until it was clear he’d be tanked by people like Pelosi, another Dem who won’t give up power unless it’s on her own terms. But we can move on from that mess, thankfully.

[-] FakeGreekGirl 31 points 4 months ago

He was forced to, how? Nobody has the power to force him do anything.

He read the writing on the wall and stepped aside. Something Trump would never do.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago

I agree Trump would never step aside. I'm just saying Biden was put in a position where the support he needed wasn't there and they made it clear to him. He still could have run, but he was made to understand that he'd lose because he wouldn't have the backers he needed. Look at the cash KH is raking in. The right people let him know they wanted her / anyone else instead.

[-] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He was pressured to step down and then was ultimately willing to listen and do so. There was no method to force him to step down -- he had more than enough delegates locked in to win the nomination if he wanted to keep going.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

Or he made sure to stand strong strategically (as anyone running would do) and stepped down at a time to maximize effectiveness.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

No, he was planning to run again. His debate performance was the nail in the coffin.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago

Giving an incredible amount of credit where there's no evidence. Our politicians / politics aren't terribly complicated. There are people who want power and they act accordingly. And there are people who want to do some good. They might be the rare case where they don't get corrupted (Bernie). And then the rest gradually learn to live within the system and perpetuate it (possibly AOC; can't tell for sure, but it seems more like it as time passes).

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago

i mean, he rightly, i think did what was expected. The incumbency advantage over someone like trump, especially with having pushed SO much productive legislation is a really safe bet, was it safe enough to win? Maybe?

I don't think people were expecting everyone to be super excited over kamala, until she showed up and started kicking ass.

up until that one debate, he was doing pretty ok. Not great, but not terrible enough to warrant completely removing him, which was why the DNC waited to nominate.

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
781 points (100.0% liked)

News

23616 readers
2999 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS