344
submitted 3 months ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 90 points 3 months ago

Because democratic Texans have been convinced that their vote doesn't matter. However that couldn't be further from the truth. Ted Cruz would have lost his last election if something like 6% of registered Dems who did not vote, had voted. Also Greg Abbott would have lost if around a quarter of those registered, non-voting Dems had voted. The propaganda in TX is deeply ingrained in its residents. The state would have voted blue in the last presidential election. Trump won by 8% while over 20 million registered voters did not vote.

IF YOU LIVE IN TEXAS AND YOU ARE READING THIS PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THINGS LIVING, VOTE.

here is a link to verify that you are registered (many residents believe they are registered but are in fact not)

https://www.texas.gov/living-in-texas/texas-voter-registration/

If you are not registered, register here:

https://vrapp.sos.state.tx.us/index.asp

Print out your registration and mail that fucker in today so you'll be ready for early voting in October

YES TEXAS HAS EARLY VOTING AND TIME OFF LAWS. THAT MEANS WORK CANNOT PREVENT YOU FROM TAKING TIME OFF TO GET TO THE VOTING BOOTHS.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 40 points 3 months ago

There is also the voter suppression.

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 33 points 3 months ago

Don’t forget gerrymandering!

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

It’s a gumbo of cheatin’!

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago

Voter suppression also includes telling people that voting doesn't matter, and that "both sides are exactly the same".

[-] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 3 months ago

If multimillion-dollar political campaigns can't generate more enthusiasm for voting than the "It doesn't matter" crowd can suppress it then the politics are bad.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Don't flatter yourself/them, inaction is infinitely easier than action. I don't think the "don't vote" crowd is good at suppression, I think they're just dumb and lazy.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

As opposed to the "smart and proactive" people who vote once every four years and pat themselves on the back for a job well done?

I've been doing that my entire life, but politics sure do seem worse now, don't they?

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Worse than what? Then the 60s? The 70s?

Go ahead and withhold your vote, I'm sure that will work out great. Everyone knows the Overton window shifts towards the people who don't vote or participate in elections. The Republicans have shifted further and further right because the neo-nazis and alt-right fuckwads and gamer-gate idiots all banded together and simply didn't vote.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 2 points 3 months ago

Worse than what? Then the 60s? The 70s?

Worse than they were when you started voting.

Go ahead and withhold your vote. I'm sure that will work out great.

Maybe instead of blaming the nonvoters, you could take a minute to understand their motivations so that you might be able to better convince them otherwise?

Dunno, just seems reasonable to me.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I understand their motivations, but their methods demonstrably and historically do not work, and actively harm the causes they care about. So again, go for it, I'm sure it will work out great. The other side has made progress by doing the exact opposite, and feminists famously campaigned to be able to vote just for some disenfranchised young people to realize the true path to change is...nothing.

So reasonable lol

[-] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 3 months ago

Again, and please, please listen to me this time.

  • I'm not telling you or anyone not to vote.

  • I'm begging you to consider what arguments or incentives will actually be effective at convincing nonvoters to vote.

This smarmy attitude and the reflexive dismissal of nonvoters as people who cannot be helped is counterproductive at best. Risking the further alienation of the people you're trying to get on your side just to satisfy some need to feel morally superior.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

You can't reason people out of positions they didn't reason themselves into. Pointing out that the literally opposite strategy by the GOP got us here and that it is not grounded in reality is not some "smarmy" attitude lol

[-] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I didn't say anything about reason, this is rhetoric we're talling about, and denying the reality that people don't like being talked down to isn't going to win friends or influence people.

[-] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

The biggest hurdle for voters is registration in Texas. It is the most effective form of voter suppression followed by the "your vote doesn't matter" propaganda. You cannot register to vote online. You register to vote through a few obscure avenues. The way I linked above is a mail in form. You mail your registration and they mail you back a confirmation and vote location based on your address. God forbid you move or misspelled something on your registration form or get your registration by snail mail sent out too late. If it's time to vote and you end up realizing you're one of the many people not ACTUALLY registered, well now you really do not have enough time to get registered for this voting cycle because the USPS can take 5 business days to deliver, the state of Texas can take 5 business days from receipt to process your registration and then 5 more business days for USPS to deliver your information. 3 weeks... If it's time to vote and you aren't registered, you are not voting.

It becomes significantly easier to renew your registration once you are registered but you have to register first.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

And the state party that is utterly incompetent at anything other than shutting out progressives.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
344 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2426 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS