250
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ImWaitingForRetcons@lemm.ee 17 points 7 months ago

I dunno, most people are probably going to remember his decisions on Gaza much more strongly.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 32 points 7 months ago

Probably not, historically the villain in that story will definitely be Netanyahu... he'd likely get supporting actor credits at best.

I disagree that he'll have a good legacy though, his economic legacy will likely be dwarfed by his lack of action to stop the Supreme Court. History is rarely fair.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 20 points 7 months ago

I'll give you $10 if you can point to Palestine on a map.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 months ago

Should I send my PayPal details or is there some other payment method you prefer. I can even show you which bits are Gaza and which bits are the West Bank - it'll be educational!

[-] Sami@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 months ago

Just say you don't care and move on, coward.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Trump would have been forced to do the same though. It's in the US governments blood to support Israel unconditionally (it's their project after all).

[-] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago

I genuinely don’t get how “Trump would have been forced to do the same though” even works as an excuse.

Wouldn’t it be better off if biden risked his career to actually try and prevent the genocide from continuing? Wouldn’t it be better if he even took a small risk to try and actually prevent Netanyahu from crossing one of his many lines? Wouldn’t it be better if we learned from our mistakes in WWII and instead of appeasing the fascists, we did something about fascism? Netanyahu will not be pleased with only Gaza.

To paint it as a necessity, ie “trump would have been forced to do the same,” is genuinely disgusting. This removes all agency the person in power had when they made the decisions that led up to this, and it removes the agency they have to fix this. To say the “most powerful man in the world” was forced to aid and abet a genocide is such a bullshit argument and I really wish people would just realize that.

I think it’s the worst kind of pragmatism to consider it a necessity of geopolitics to just casually cleanse a people. That sort of thing is how you make the evils of this world palatable for people on the news.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah I know it sucks but that's how the government of USA ticks. Also I am not a US resident so your rant sadly was wasted. If you are one though, be the change you want to see.

[-] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

I’m well aware that the us government sucks since I live under it.

But saying “that’s just how it works” is a thought terminating cliche.

[-] Jaderick@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Meh, he’ll probably be remembered more like Truman or Eisenhower

[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

If Trump wins, Buchanan is more likely.

[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

Yep. Forever and ever, we'll remember him as Genocide Joe. That is his name now and for the rest of all time. What a legacy.

[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 2 points 7 months ago

Or the fact that he fucked up Afghanistan withdrawal so hard he basically gave the Taliban a billion dollars in weapons, military vehicles and other materiel.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Okay hold on. The equipment being left behind is not something that was avoidable. That's the entire reason we signed it over to the ANA. Anything we actually cared about was already out of the country or air shippable and ready to go. Just on a logistics note, we spent 20 years shipping equipment into the country. There was no way it was all getting removed in 6 months.

And the only way he could have stopped the cascade failure was to foresee it and rapidly deploy several light infantry brigades. On day 1, January 21st, 2020. The Taliban were in a go mode from the day Trump lost the election because they were afraid Biden would go back on the "deal". That's why there was a cascade failure. They got to spend 7 months herding sympathetic politicians into line. And any attempt to walk away from Trump's folly would have triggered their main force coming over the border.

So without being psychic, and without super powers to teleport years worth of logistics, this was always the way it was going to happen. Which is the entire reason Trump put the date past the election.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Gotta love every armchair general that incorrectly thinks they know more than the difference between their asshole and a hole in the ground.

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
250 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20328 readers
2864 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS