411
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BluJay320 15 points 3 months ago

Not a fan, and I don’t like his relative lack of political experience. However, his status as a white male veteran who is the husband of Gabby Gifford could win some points.

Hate that it comes to that, but this is what we get. Fuck, I just want out of this shithole.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

The military background shuts up a lot. As it should.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 months ago

I'm sure John Kerry remembers the value of military service.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, and I don’t know that Drumpf fans care all that much about military service. Well, at least they don’t care what Drumpf says.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

He was running against someone who also had vaguely credible military service, so there was room to discredit without blowback

It's harder to nitpick a military record when running a draft dodger as your candidate. Given that the GOP is "supposed" to be law and order, it should provide some challenge for them to be running a draft dodging felon against a prosecutor and ex-military ticket.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

His opponent's service was literally draft dodging. For the war Kerry was honored and injured in. We're not talking about someone with a better service record dismissing some lesser record as insubstantial.

That people were making fun of an actual combat injury, regardless of whether his opponent did some air drills back at home, proves that military service isn't some sacred trait. And John Kerry didn't just serve, he was an actual war hero who saved people's lives and took a bullet in the process. Nothing either Kelly or Vance has done remotely compares to that and he was eviscerated for the very thing that's supposed to be such a gotcha for the Republicans.

[-] snownyte@kbin.run 2 points 3 months ago

How's that going to help anything? Right now, we're looking for solutions to improve our society through progressive means. Fighting wars is not the answer regardless if formerly served or actively served.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It's about perception. I'm not saying to go fight wars. But military leaders have the respect of those that could lean right. It's always about the middle. The left and the right are set. It's the centrists that make a vote happen.

[-] snownyte@kbin.run 2 points 3 months ago

Oh, but some of the clueless idiots here think he's a WONDERFUL choice apparently. God damn, people are such fucking morons that don't know anything about the candidates thoroughly. They just saw him as a replacement, got a boner and now will smite anyone critical of it.

Stupid idiotic voters are the bane of our existence every election cycle. We should hold them accountable as much as politicians. Because their stupid decisions fucks us all over.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
411 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3567 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS