264
nmtui that does not obliterate your eyes
(lemmy.ml)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
Please don't use "rape" as a casual negative verb, there are better, more accurate words to use that don't needlessly reference SA.
i really apologize if the use of that word was perceived as offensive, that was obviously not my intent. i'm usually quite straightforward in picking words (i come from a completely different culture, where sexual assaults are extremely uncommon).
PS. for the context of others reading this comment, the original title of this post was: "nmtui that does not rape your eyes."
Thank you, OP.
Thanks!
It is more likely that you are just not aware of it.
What culture is that? I wasn't aware such a thing existed.
Probably a Scandinavian country if I had to guess.
Because it normalizes a word and desensitizes it, making it less likely for victims to stand up. It can also bring up horrifying memories in SA survivors.
There exist negative words that do not share the same mass systemic connotations. It's generally better to use words that don't bring with them the same issues.
What do you mean "free?" I don't control him, but the fact is that using words that bring up topics of SA despite that being an extremely sensitive subject is a bad thing.
There is nothing to be gained at best, and at worst you've resurfaced horrifying memories for others.
Basic human decency, which is why OP quickly changed it and everyone is on the same page.
None of that actually addresses my points, you're just finger-wagging at me for being "woke."
If you could make a coherent point we could have a discussion.
Additionally, referencing likes/dislikes is pointless, I could just as easily point to how your comments have worse ratios than mine.
Quite a lot of "citation needed" here, along with a weird obsession with fignting for your right to be an enemy of victims of SA. Touch grass.
You clearly know, so why ask?
You didn't need to outright state that you're a bad person, that was self-evident by batting for normalization of rape.
Guys, guys... You're over-ideologizing a very simple humane request. I was asked nicely and respectfully -- I tried to respond in the same way. Simple as that. I'm usually not regulating my personal communications with others in terms of laws and amendments.
Maybe. In any case I try to never infer someone's tone from text interactions since it's always faulty and lacks human dimension. By default I just assume people actually mean what they write. I think we get (on average) more aggressive, and tend to show less empathy when not talking face to face.
Also... The term "American left-wing" is offensive for a Marxist like myself. :D