558

President Biden is finalizing plans to endorse major changes to the Supreme Court in the coming weeks, including proposals for legislation to establish term limits for the justices and an enforceable ethics code, according to two people briefed on the plans.

He is also weighing whether to call for a constitutional amendment to eliminate broad immunity for presidents and other constitutional officeholders, the people said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations.

The announcement would mark a major shift for Biden, a former chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who has long resisted calls to reform the high court. The potential changes come in response to growing outrage among his supporters about recent ethics scandals surrounding Justice Clarence Thomas and decisions by the new court majority that have changed legal precedent on issues including abortion and federal regulatory powers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] teft@lemmy.world 179 points 9 months ago

Proposing the changes could excite the voters enough to give him control of both chambers. Even announcing it might shift the needle for some fence sitters.

[-] tiefling 127 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's exactly what we need right now. There are almost no undecided voters left, just unmotivated voters. We need something to energize voters who have been feeling ignored by the DNC, at best.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 30 points 9 months ago

Seriously. His passive approach to the upcoming election has thusfar been infuriating. It's like he's assumed that not being Trump will be enough to win it for him, while his support dwindles. We need something to get people excited about voting for him, and wide-sweeping governmental reforms could be just that, at least among folks who're paying attention. The "Well, both sides are corrupt, so what does it matter?" crowd.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Couldn't have said it better myself. This is red meat for the base, but that's what we need right now after weeks of feeling deflated.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 months ago

This is the most annoying part about politics.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

It'd be nice if he'd announce dealing with Citizens United at the same time.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 32 points 9 months ago

Stop. This is good.

You are looking at a steak dinner and complaining that there's no ice cream sundae too.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

if the got the sundae, they'd complain it didn't come with a blowie, too

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

But I like blowies!

[-] stringere@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

I'm lactose intolerant you insensitive jerk!

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

But I like ice cream sundaes

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

How many times have the DNC lead people to the polls with big promises, then half way, if at all, deliver? Ive been able to vote since Reagan and its been the same thing every election. This is stuff he should have tried to tackle his first or second year. We are 15 seconds to the end of the fourth quarter and hes trying to throw a Hail Mary in the wrong direction

[-] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

The downvotes on you are infuriating. That's just people sticking their heads in the sand. Democrats always whip out the carrot right before an election. Then let it rot afterwards.

Still waiting on that student loan debt memo, Biden. I'd really like to know why you couldn't even try to do anything on your 2020 promise until right before the 2022 midterms.

this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
558 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23206 readers
3116 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS