427
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by JonsJava@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

WHAT

  • Former U.S. President Donald J. Trump was shot at a rally in PA.

TRUMPS STATEMENT

“I want to thank The United States Secret Service, and all of Law Enforcement, for their rapid response on the shooting that just took place in Butler, Pennsylvania. Most importantly, I want to extend my condolences to the family of the person at the Rally who was killed, and also to the family of another person that was badly injured. It is incredible that such an act can take place in our Country. Nothing is known at this time about the shooter, who is now dead. I was shot with a bullet that pierced the upper part of my right ear. I knew immediately that something was wrong in that I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin. Much bleeding took place, so I realized then what was happening. GOD BLESS AMERICA!”

WHAT WE THINK WE KNOW SO FAR

  • gunman is dead
  • Trump "is fine"
  • one attendee is dead
  • another attendee is in critical condition

News Sources

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 271 points 2 years ago

Alright, let's get it out ahead of time, since I'm already seeing this:

It's probably not staged. Trump reacts quickly - the fuck kind of timing you think that bloated potato has? To lift his hand to his ear just as the gunshot rings out? And the idea that the shooter grazed him on purpose is, likewise, absurd. The kind of risk that would entail, to just nick his ear?

Whether the shooter was insane or politically motivated, this is a real event.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 99 points 2 years ago

I said this in another one of these threads- it is not at all outlandish to think that someone unhinged with a gun would see the threat of a fascist dictator and decide to do something about it.

[-] Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml 75 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I remember my grandfather telling the story of how Hitler held a speech at a Stadium that was visible from his attic window, and his biggest regret was, that he did not have a machinegun to take him and the other Nazi officials with him out. The US has enough guns and desperation for someone to attempt this, definitely.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
[-] Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 years ago

I don't remember him mentioning the exact year, it's been ages and I was a child still when he was still alive, but I know it was before the Machtergreifung, because he told it as having been a rally during an election campaign, eerily fitting, I guess.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure it would even take someone unhinged.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 12 points 2 years ago

The right has been agitating for stochastic terrorism for about sixteen god damn years. Well, they got it.

It's likely a good thing the guy missed. Trump being assassinated might just kick off the open violence that has been brewing. Still might, but it'll depend on the next couple of days. If that dude turns out to be a left-winger, and Trump makes no attempt to stop it, I could see things getting very, very ugly.

[-] Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 years ago

If that dude turns out to be a left-winger

That dude's political leaning will turn out to be whatever the news we prefer says he was.

load more comments (1 replies)

it happens a lot more than you would think throughout american history, sometimes with guns, sometimes without. Obama had 8 attempts throughout his terms in office. Biden has had one so far, trump has had a few, nothing more significant than obama though, except for maybe being shot, just barely.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago

Thank you. And fuck the idiots spouting off with the "staged" nonsense. The time to believe something is staged is when you have evidence that it was.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

People are obviously on high alert, considering how far Trump is willing to go given Jan 6th. From the Reichstag fire to the Russian apartment bombings, such events manufactured or actual have profound impact on public perception and action. Naomi Klein's (not to be confused with the nut job Naomi Wolf) The Shock Doctrine details this well.

No sign this was a false flag, but holy fuck does it have terrible implications.

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Trump's entire persona is built on lies, it shouldn't be a surprise that it's many people's first thought.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

But it shouldn't be. He shows no signs - cognitively speaking - of being capable of putting something like this together as a stage-managed event, and all of his past stage-managed events have been shitshows because he micromanages everything and he's incompetent.

[-] Botzo@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Oh, it's all tongue-in-cheek, and yet: quid pro quo.

i mean honestly, it's scary, but it's also not a good time to be an american right now, from the immunity rulling to the jan 6th delays, and all the other bullshit going on, things seem to be getting vastly more interesting now than they were just a few months ago.

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don’t doubt the shooter was genuinely trying to kill him. But I also think there are an unprecedented number of Republicans and Democrats who would be secretly relieved if their own party’s candidate were assassinated.

[-] Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml 51 points 2 years ago

It's a very common gut reaction to assume something like this has to be "staged", I said it in the other thread in some discussions: It's understandable to have it as this feeling. But everyone who feels that way: take a breath, remember the world is much more chaotic and much less controlled than you think, you don't have to think of yourself as stupid for thinking it, but wait for more information to come out and be ready to give it up then.

Reacting properly to this new reality is much more important, than trying to adjust reality to fit an emotion. It's human to do that, react instinctively in a first gut reaction, but it is also human to be able to let go of that.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In the spirit of not promoting violence, I'd like to promote the alternative of the Alex Jones treatment. Gaslight the fucker and set a conspiracy in motion to hound him the rest of his days.

[-] PoopDelivery@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago

I agree. We're all just processing this and should probably take a break and come back when there is more info and we can think critically. That said, this is very scary, like, I feel like my physical safety is at risk because of this. So, not knowing what others are going through, I'm going to have some compassion for any initial reactions. People are having these same discussions face to face right now but not everyone can do that and may need to.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Yeah, a 120 meter shot to graze does not exist. One inch to the right and he's dead. With wind variables and stuff, the shooter who can reliably pull that off in one shot or volley does not exist.

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

With a better rifle and a spotter maybe.

Edit. Just want to say I don’t think it’s a false flag in anyway. Just speculating lol

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Not how guns work I'm afraid. I wouldn't trust Olympic shooter with that type of shot at a closer distance.

It is not marvel movie, you don't go for the head.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 years ago

It’s probably not staged. Trump reacts quickly - the fuck kind of timing you think that bloated potato has?

it's absolutely what you would expect the reaction to be. Much like burning your hand on a stove where your brain deals with the situation a lot quicker than you can logically process it, these kinds of injuries can do the same thing. It's more than likely the people surrounding him that clued him in on it quicker than anything. That's the one thing you would be prepared to expect.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Yeah, if you’re going to stage a fake assassination, you don’t fire a bullet a couple inches away from a kill shot. It’s crazy how close this was to a successful attempt.

[-] excral@feddit.org 11 points 2 years ago

If it was staged, the only feasible way would be that he wasn't shot at all and all we saw was fake blood. Regardless, I don't think it was actually staged

[-] queue 11 points 2 years ago

Genuinely infurating that the moment anything happens, NeoLibs will just start copying right-wing talking points.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Will or they did? Any examples?

[-] queue 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If you check the modlog, before the Mods here started removing them, dozens of commenters said its a false flag, set up by trump.

Here's a screenshot of it happening on PoliticalMemes. EDIT: Used the proper screenshot. https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/9664605

And here's some screenshots of the mod logs:

This isn't getting into the ones on Mastodon and Twitter who also repeated the same Alex Jones level thinking.

EDIT: Weird how I gave proof, they move the goal posts. Give proof, move the goal posts. I'm starting to think they just want an excuse for their weird takes and Q-Anon thinking.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

And how do you know they are NeoLibs?

[-] queue 8 points 2 years ago

On twitter/Mastodon with 🇺🇦 🇮🇱 in their profiles, and treating any valid criticisms of Biden are actually by Russian bots.

That's why I consider them NeoLibs.

[-] keegomatic@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

I see, so you just use the term “NeoLib” to mean “people you disagree with” rather than “people with neoliberal political beliefs”

[-] queue 6 points 2 years ago

If it advocates for Neoliberal polices, speaks for Neoliberal polices, defends Neoliberal polices, yeah I do. Take your concern trolling elsewhere. I'm not going to bootlick for Reagan and every president afterwards.

[-] keegomatic@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

You think the people you’re calling “NeoLibs” above are Reagan fans? Your criteria for neoliberal policies is “supports Ukraine and Israel at the same time” and “is aware of the current reality of Russian disinformation tactics”? Neither of those have anything to do with neoliberalism. I don’t think you know what “concern trolling” means, either.

[-] queue 6 points 2 years ago

Neoliberalism was invented to criticize Reagan's policies. Clinton took those polices with a coat of blue paint. Bush made them worse. Obama continued them. Trump made them worse. Biden continued them.

[-] thoro@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

^ This is a decently accurate account of how neoliberalism grew to become the dominant economic ideology in the US and Western Europe. Though it was really just a description of Reaganism and Thatcherism at first. Read David Harvey if you disagree.

[-] queue 6 points 2 years ago

Weird how I call out bullshit, people ask for proof, I give them proof, they move the goal posts, I give that goal some proof, they move the goalposts.

It's like... I know these weirdos when I see them and call them that for a reason.

[-] thoro@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You're being pedantic. The dominant ideology of the Democratic party is neoliberalism. Democrats continued neoliberal policies following Reagan, like NAFTA and others. They will consistently defer to the market based solutions and "free enterprise" as opposed to actual socialism. The dominant political user on these platforms (especially .world) are capital D Democrats and liberals. You see this on Reddit a lot in /r/neoliberal.

This user likely isn't wrong when using this description as a generalization.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I asked about the ones you quoted.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I love lemm.ee

Yhe mod log is available for all to see. You can even search by username.

Only one ban so far, I think I'm doing good!

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

It seems far more likely that Trump has some sort of quantum immortality than this being staged. Truly an insane shot to miss so narrowly while still grazing. I get why it makes people scratch their head. It will be interesting to see what happens.

[-] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

If it was staged then they are playing a very risky game. It doesn’t take much error to make a bullet that grazes your ear dome you. It’s basically certain that this wasn’t staged.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
427 points (100.0% liked)

News

36557 readers
2316 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS