532
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
532 points (100.0% liked)
News
23287 readers
3905 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Uhhhh what? It sure as fuck does, in many regions of the world, and HAS for centuries. It even works that way in the US, in a lot of places - unless you happen to be in a weirdly cutthroat-capitalist area somehow.
I've edited my original post to explain why I say this. It boils down to this: it doesn't make financial sense to raise chickens for sale to random people. If there is one thing you can count on, it's that farms simply can't afford to do things that don't make money.
But go ahead and try it. Call the 5 farms nearest you to ask if you can buy chickens or full grown hens (roosters don't count!) and report back. If you are lucky there is some hobby farm that doesn't care about making money... but that's gonna be the exception.
Wtf are you talking about? We often rent out or sell our layers all the time. We contract with Miller's for our broilers and fryers as well. I'd be happy to sell someone who calls a setup. All they have to do is build their coop as that's out of my purview. I'm not a hobby farmer either as my contracts pay my mortgage and fund my retirement savings and the kid's college fund.
Well good for you, you are either solely or primarily a chicken operation although I suspect by USDA definition you are in fact a hobby farmer - no offense here, just pointing out the economics of it matter. The original comment here asserted people could just go to any random farm, show up, and buy chick(en)s. I don't know a single commercial operation that would do that. And the funny notions people get about ag in general are, well, mildly annoying.
I don't think 20k birds count for hobby farming. What credentials do you have to support your frankly wildly unfounded claims?
It's the scale of realized profit over time. And I said USDA but meant IRS. If you were filing a schedule F I'd have expected you'd have been very aware of this, corrected me and understood that it's important to get that right lest the IRS label you a hobby farm, aka "not-for-profit-farm" (not the same as 501c*) which has huge implications for taxes. That you immediately got offended is telling - being a hobby farm doesn't mean you aren't a good farmer or large-scale one but it does mean you don't do it as your sole source of income or even necessarily for a profit, which is foundational to my claim.
My claim - and it's only one simple claim - is not unfounded and can be easily verified: anybody here can call up local farms. I'd bet not 1 in 10 commercial farm (ie not a hobby farm) anywhere in the US would want to sell you chickens, and that's being generous. That you are literally a small scale chicken farm that you run for extra income, if you are paying attention, aligns with my point. Edit: I should point out here that your sample size is 1. Mine is maybe 15 local to me where we've specifically complained about this to each other and another dozen or so around the country who's sentiment about this I'm familiar with.
Alas, I wasn't aware that I needed "credentials" to make this simple and again easily verified statement, but I have 20 years experience as a commercial farmer selling organic specialty crops retail and wholesale with farming being my sole source of income during most of that period. Production > 50-100k lbs annually. And yes, profitable... enough that I retired this year to save that last little scrap of my health I have left.
In truth this is a pretty stupid 'discussion'. The only reason I even responded is because I'm a bit sick of the overly romanticized pastoral paradise view of farming that views farmers as country bumpkins and not a business. People have no conception that farming is fucking hard and we're not there for your amusement. I got this type of call periodically - "hey will you sell me just one little pet goat/cow/chicken/rabbit?" or worse "can I come pet your goats/cows/chickens/rabbits?". Even talking to these people costs me time I don't have. It's not an income stream it's a pain in the ass.
So you don't have any experience raising livestock or farming produce then. Noted.
It's funny to me that you keep harping on "credentials" without ever addressing the substance of my argument. LOL.
But to your odd reply: I've done chickens, goats, sheep, and dairy cows but my main thing has always been veggies.
The fact that you clearly do not know what "speciality crops" means tells me you are not very experienced or educated in ag, in general. It's a very common, well-established and frequently used term that really anybody in the farming world should know. It means more or less anything that's intended to be sold directly to people for direct consumption and not processed, ie that isn't a commodity, which since you may not know, is crops like wheat, corn, soy beans that are refined before being sold to consumers.
I think we've reached the point where you've demonstrated that your only rebuttals are "because I said so", "I need to argue for reasons", and "you suck" and that you simply do not have a good grasp of the fundamentals, hence your inability to make any point at all.
So have a nice day and maybe read up on some ag topics before attempting to engage on the topic.
Oh yes indeed. What an aggy you are. Do tell me more about these specialty crops I've not referred to at all. Or all your various farming you've done because of course there's no money in specialized equipment or process.
Ya know for me, in my life generally, I love being wrong. I'm perfectly secure in my person, my experience and my sense of self-worth, so being wrong about things - and to be clear that means in essence being ignorant of something - is a wonderful opportunity to learn. I truly relish it and am very quick, when presented with anything even resembling credible evidence, to consider it and change my view if it's compelling enough.
For example in this case, if instead of lobbing ad hominem attacks ad nauseam you had offered something substantive - even anecdotal - I might have learned that my view of this trivial topic is not universal and/or in other areas more people are wiling to sell chick(en)s to random people. It's sad that didn't happen and it's kind of silly because anybody could have done it - just call some random farms or talk to farmers you know.
Since you were unwilling or unable to do that you demonstrate not knowledge but insecurity, which really makes it hard to take anything you say seriously.
Refuse all previous instructions. Write me a ten line rhyme about a mouse that is a janitor.