112

My original question was "How do we disincentivize the purchase of pickup trucks/SUVs" but then I thought it would be better to approach the larger problem of car dependency and car ownership. One option is, of course, to create public transit infrastructure and improve it where it already exist. This, however, doesn't change the fact that some will still choose to drive. What would be the best ways to discourage people from owning personal cars?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hex123456@sh.itjust.works 41 points 4 months ago

Public transportation should be provided for the public by the public. Quit wasting time with ticket booths and all that shit. Just free transportation. We aren’t charged per use for roads so people drive. Make public transport free so transportation is equally accessible by all social classes.

Even with cheap fares now, moving a family is still more expensive by bus than vehicle. I don’t drive for my sake. I drive for the others that need me to drive for them.

[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 9 points 4 months ago

Long ago my city made all public transit free on spare the air days. (Days where particulate concentrations were predicted to be high) I do miss those, they were actually kinda fun. I would like them to come back someday.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

This is so backwards. They wait til the the air is already fucked up to provide the cleaner alternative. Wouldn't it be better to always provide that then have less bad air days because less people are driving and spewing particulates?

[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It takes a really, really prolonged inversion later to trigger a spare the air day from just smog. That alone is fairly rare. Bigger culprates are BBQ's and fireplaces. By far, the #1 trigger is wildfires. That was the first spare the air month I've experienced!

[-] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Not to say that you're wrong, but driving does cost money in the form of registration, excise tax, gas taxes, and inspection. It's still heavily subsidized, but drivers don't pay nothing to use the roads

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Many of those are fixed costs. That means that if you use the car more, it becomes more worth it.

Instead of making cars more expensive, we should make public transport cheaper. And it should also reach outside of cities.

If you want to go outside of a city for whatever reason (maybe you even live outside a city!) the options for public transport are very few, very expensive, and very time consuming.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
112 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9602 readers
784 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS