89
submitted 4 months ago by original_reader@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

It's in the eye of the beholder, of course. But it would be great to see some solid recommendations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 63 points 4 months ago

The distribution doesn't to too much, its mostly the desktop environment. I like the look of KDE Plasma the most. But usually I craft my own look after a while.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 29 points 4 months ago

I like the look of KDE Plasma the most.

GNOME vs KDE gang fight has been summoned.

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 18 points 4 months ago

The look of GNOME isn't the problem of GNOME. ;-) I'm not a good citizen right now.

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 10 points 4 months ago

Absolutely. GNOME often looks better, but it just doesnt work. Basic things everywhere are removed or not added.

[-] dallen@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago

One man’s “basic” things are another man’s clutter …

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago

So you mean...

  • editing images (in the viewer, screenshot tool)
  • being allowed to customize the UI of any app
  • changing the login screen (gdm) background
  • creating a textfile from the filemanager
  • editing .desktop entries graphically
  • ...

?

Hahaha, I disagree

[-] dallen@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yea, none of those things matter to me.

Don’t get me wrong, I’ve had plenty of fun customizing DEs but I don’t really need that on my daily driver. I also have more of a terminal based workflow so perhaps shell customization scratches that itch for me.

To each their own :)

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

This is not about customizing. What app do you use for editing images, or dont you do this at all?

On GNOME either using Gwenview (KDE) or GIMP, Krita, Kolourpaint, Pinta would work. Which are all very big programs.

[-] dallen@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

Sometimes I use Drawing for adding some annotations but I mostly just paste directly from the screenshot tool.

In terms of editing, I work more with SVG where I use a very simple editor BoxySVG.

[-] nik282000@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

I have given in to GNOME. Set dark mode, install the extension "Tactile" and never touch the setting again.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

Well GNOME has issues but in terms of look it's 69420x better than KDE.

[-] pukeko@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago

The thing I've learned in the many years of watching this fight is that the things Gnome people (of which I am one, though I have immense respect and appreciation for the KDE project) don't like about KDE tend to be the things KDE people like about KDE and vice versa.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

These projects are almost diametrically opposite. GNOME tries to provide a very simple, solid but not very configurable desktop with good accessibility and stability while KDE tries to make a very configurable and powerful environment that can be customized to anyone's needs. I don't like KDE because it's unstable, way too powerful for my personal needs (their "simple by default; powerful when needed" concept doesn't really work) and I just don't like the UI. Though KDE's better performance is an objective advantage.

[-] pukeko@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

I tend to agree. I mean, the gnome workflow is more appealing to me (though I have since moved to a WM), but my dislike of KDE comes down to (a) too many options everywhere and (b) it looks too “sharp”. If KDE had an “I’m done fiddling” mode that hid most of the options and I found a softer theme, I’d probably like it fine.

Absolutely nothing I just said should take away from others’ preference for KDE. I’m glad we can like what we like.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

I have to agree. I'm hoping Cosmic will be somewhere in-between!

[-] pukeko@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

It seems to still be strongly gnome-adjacent, which fits with the softer, "calmer" aesthetic Pop has, but with functional tweaks that are more aligned with Win11/KDE (absolutely intended as a positive statement, as far as moving the ball forward on UX design). I worry that team KDE won't like the "sane defaults" simplicity that it appears to have inherited from the gnome days, but that might just be the part of me that experiences terminal choice paralysis every time I fire up KDE. :)

[-] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 4 months ago

Agreed. I think it's not about distros we should have pay attention, but desktop environments.

And about "most appealing" DE I think it's subjective. Surely KDE has the most flexible structure and may be exactly what you want, but Gnome is also appealing for some people (myself included).

Again, there is no right or wrong, just personal preferences

[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You don't need much to make something look fancy or modern. Even XFCE can look modern.

edit: made it less offensive.

[-] BaalInvoker@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 4 months ago

Good for you that you like your XFCE environment

I would like to see how your desktop is, if you don't mind

However, again, it's personal preference

[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Can't. feddit.de can't upload images and in browser i suddenly get a server error(?) with my lemmy.ml account.

Well uh, left bar with virtual desktop overview bottom, window buttons top, autoexpand
right bar with network and systemload bars top, sensor numbers bottom, fixed size
top bar Android style with left hand clock and date, whiskermenu (symbol view) as the empty space in the center (title only and whitespaces as title), right hand systray with mail and connman-gtk, pulseaudio plugin. Bars are on intelligently autohide, theme is Adapta.

This is on my notebook with touchscreen.

Nice thing is, XFCE can pin bars to specific displays or main display. Meaning, if i plug my ultrawide in, the top bar stays on notebook while left and right bar switch to the ultrawide, a center bar with Wiskermrmu with list view for desktop usage appears.

[-] twinnie@feddit.uk 3 points 4 months ago

Somebody needs to tell me what they’re doing to Plasma to make them like it so much because when I install it with Breeze it just looks like Windows 2000.

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 6 points 4 months ago

Windows 2000 looks nothing alike KDE Plasma with Breeze theme. But besides that point, you don't have to like what others like. It's just taste.

[-] winety@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago

Windows 2000 looked amazing.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

I don't really care how it looks precisely, so long as its semi-professional and consistent in its style.

Like, I change the font to Fira Sans, because Noto Sans gives me depression, but the rest of my customizations are all just to carve out my ideal workflow.

[-] BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 months ago

I took it as a question of which distro looks nicest out of the box (like, which distro manager has made real effort to make something particularly nice looking).

this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
89 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

48121 readers
523 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS