186
submitted 4 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ToastedPlanet 95 points 4 months ago

The discourse around Biden exiting the race is moot because the only one who decides if he continues is Biden. Biden is still running so nothing changes. Biden is who we need to vote for to keep our democracy.

Biden had a bad debate performance. It was a missed opportunity to pick up new voters. Biden demoralized his base. But we're still stuck with him, because there is no external mechanism to stop him from running.

The most effective tool we have to prevent the christo-fascist takeover this November is voting. The debate did not change that.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 44 points 4 months ago

the only one who decides if he continues is Biden.

Got it.

Biden is who we need to vote for to keep our democracy.

Um, what? Vote Biden to save Democracy, and fuck you if you want a different candidate.

I'll vote for Biden's corpse in 2028 if it's still the only way to keep Trump out of the Whitehouse, but give up the "save Democracy" schtick. That ship has sailed. Democracy is dead, and it's not just the Republican's fault.

[-] ToastedPlanet 25 points 4 months ago

Democracy is still alive for now. That's why voting matters. Our flawed democracy is still our best chance at adverting fascism. Which is why the fascists want to take it away. Giving up early gets us nothing. So keep fighting.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

I think his point is that, if our only alternative to fascism is to vote for a senile old man who was forced upon voters without a primary, then this system can't credibly be called democracy.

[-] ToastedPlanet 4 points 4 months ago

It is still democracy. It doesn't matter how old the candidate is.

[-] Cityshrimp@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Its not about how old the candidate is, its about not having other valid alternatives when you dont like the candidate chosen for you.

Edit: just to make sure the point gets across. Imagine going to a restaurant, the waiter asks if you want to drink moldy water or toxic industrial waste. You see behind him lies an array of normal, refreshing beverages but sorry, you weren’t given those choices so you can’t have any of that. Thats basically this election.

[-] ToastedPlanet 4 points 4 months ago

We live in a first-past-the-post voting system. These choices, Biden and Trump, are in part the result of that system. We need to change to a different system like rank choice voting or approval voting. But despite being flawed, our system is still a democracy.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago

You can only continue to call this system a democracy by setting the bar very very low. Pointless to argue semantics though, better to argue substance. We won't get to a better - more representative - democracy by working within the current system; we need to apply external pressure. People don't feel that voting in this election will save democracy because they don't feel there's enough of it left to be saved. Voting in this election can at best stave off a total collapse to fascism, but that's it.

[-] ToastedPlanet 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Our democracy is a democracy. That is a fact. The most effective method to improving our democracy is using our democracy. US history has demonstrated this repeatedly. Our democracy is our most effective tool to prevent fascism, so we should fight to keep it as long as possible. The fascist movement will continue to grow until we defeat their ideas and abandon neo-liberalism. This means we need to elect Biden in 2024 and then elect a socialist in 2028. edit: typo

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago

The most effective method to improving our democracy is using our democracy. US history has demonstrated this repeatedly.

Meaningful progress has only ever been made in the US after mass movements engaged in direct action and protests (often met with violent state repression), and even then the legislation that's made is usually much less than the people wanted. This is not a sign of a democracy that functions for the people.

[-] ToastedPlanet 2 points 4 months ago

It is the sign of democracy for the people. All of the social, economic, and political progress in the US is thanks to movements that translated into legislation, amendments, and court rulings via our democracy. Without a democracy those movements would have hit a wall. Of course we need to continue to improve our democracy. We need unfettered majority rule in this country. It is functionally possible to achieve this, but people have to vote. The movements won't translate into positive change if people skip voting.

[-] squirrels@midwest.social 2 points 4 months ago

Why on earth do you think you'll be given the option to elect a socialist in 2028?

[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 4 months ago

If Biden wins this election in 2024 we will have a Democratic primary without a Democratic incumbent in 2028. The last two times that happened we were given a socialist to vote for in the Democratic primary. In 2028 we need to make sure whoever that is wins the primary. We can do that by spreading socialist and progressive ideas in the fours years between now and the 2028 election.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

If your choices are vote for A and democracy ends or vote for B, it isn't really a choice. If it isn't a choice, it's not a democracy. It's political theater. Not unlike mock elections in dictatorships.

You're fucked either way, both choices are pathways to the same destination. Just at different speeds/ different routes.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 4 months ago

We can still get back to democracy. This isn't democracy. Did you even read my comment btw? This knee jerk canned response isn't even human.

[-] ToastedPlanet 2 points 4 months ago

We are living in a democracy right now. The fascists are attempting to takeover our democracy. If we didn't have democracy there wouldn't be an election.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

I don't understand this chain of logic why we need to keep Biden:

  1. Biden isn't the best candidate.

  2. Only Biden can drop (false)

  3. Biden will never make the adult decision to retire.

  4. We have to plow forward with Biden because he'll never change his mind on anything.

Like, the argument for why Biden has to stay, is just reasons he shouldn't stay...

And it's not just up to him. It's up to the DNC.

We are not stuck with Biden.

Biden and the DNC just know that's the only way people will vote for him, so they've been reporting it for like 5 years now.

[-] ToastedPlanet 12 points 4 months ago

Only Biden can drop

This is a true statement. Biden won the primary. The delegates are pledged to him. Biden is the one who has to decide if he drops out.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

Mostly true. The DNC is the organization that makes the rules and can change them at any time. That would be a pretty bad move though unless the party really felt united in needing to do a hostile expulsion. Realistically Biden needs to be on board for a change to work, so being able to play Calvinball with primary voting rules isn't really an out.

[-] ToastedPlanet 4 points 4 months ago

Yes, as I understand it they would have to change the rules to expel him. People seem to be assuming that there is already a mechanism to expel him without doing that.

[-] match@pawb.social 17 points 4 months ago

sounds like the party is dysfunctional if we can't replace a candidate with 120 days of leadup. that's longer than any other country's election season. the inability of the democratic party to do good things on purpose makes a strong argument against their leadership if what they think they offer is competence

[-] ToastedPlanet 4 points 4 months ago

The Democratic Party is still the best option when the only viable alternative is a christo-fascist party.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

The guy didn't ace a debate with a sore throat and jet-lag so the media loses its shit. The orange liar has rape and 34 felony convictions- crickets. Nothing new here.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 8 points 4 months ago

I searched for an editorial board opinion in the New York Times which said Trump should withdraw from the Republican ticket because he lied throughout the debate, but I couldn't find one. Why didn't they write one?

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Because the media is complicit and owned by the same oligarchs that have taken control of our country.

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There are two standards. Everyone expects Republicans to be lying shitheads so when they are, no one is surprised.

We somehow just accept this.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 months ago

I'm running on an independent ticket. My platform: Unlike the other two candidates no one wonders if I can physically handle the journey from back stage to the podium.

[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 4 months ago

You're the hero we needed and the hero we deserved.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 months ago

I'm fucking serious, one of the talking heads on the news said Biden needed to "remain upright" to come off well in this debate. That was said of the currently serving commander-in-chief!

Unlike the actual President Of These United States of America, the 24 hour news cycle probably expects more out of me than "can stand up straight for 30 minutes without incident."

Remember when Trump made a point to demonstrate his ability to lift and drink from a glass of water?

Seriously next time these two appear on stage I want them to step through a hoop to prove there are no wires.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

the only one who decides if he continues is Biden … vote for to keep our democracy.

I … I don’t think that’s a democracy.

[-] ToastedPlanet 3 points 4 months ago

Biden won the Democratic Party's primary election so he is going to be the Democratic Party's candidate. That is democracy.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Ah yes. Demos is greek for the democratic party.

[-] ToastedPlanet 3 points 4 months ago

In a democracy, the person who wins an election gets the position they ran for.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

If there is only one predetermined person running does it still count as “winning”?

How is it different with two predetermined people?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

We're past "preventing" the Christo-fascist takeover. We're in damage control now.

VOTE.

[-] ToastedPlanet 3 points 4 months ago

The christo-fascists are not in complete control of all three branches of government yet. That is why this election and voting is so important. Calling it early is both inaccurate and unhelpful.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Biden was tired from too many engagements, jet lag and a sore throat. You could see he was tried. On the other hand, the orange felon/rapist/liar had one job - to not be an asshole - he failed spectacularly.

[-] ToastedPlanet 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah, at least Trump didn't gain any ground. Biden lost the battle, but we're still fighting the war.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

He spent an entire week focusing on just this debate at Camp David.

Why would he be tired? What other engagements did he have?

[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Can the party not compel him to step down and elect a more healthy replacement.

[-] ToastedPlanet 3 points 4 months ago

There is no mechanism at this stage that can force him to do so that I am aware of. They can of course try to convince him, but no one from Biden's inner circle, like Jill Biden, or any of the hypothetical candidates people like to float, like Gavin Newsom, has expressed interest in doing that.

this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
186 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2369 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS