1134
submitted 2 months ago by spicytuna62@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cqst 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] partizan@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Not just plants, wolfs and other animals are quite frequent there also and from studies they have less than 2% birth defects...

That just shows us, that how huge is the nuclear scare propaganda...

[-] nomous@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Does this look poisoned to you?

Yeah it looks bombed-out as fuck to anything more complicated than plant-life. I'm not saying we shouldn't be pursuing nuclear energy, just that this argument feels very poorly constructed and intentionally misleading.

https://knowablemagazine.org/content/article/food-environment/2022/scientists-cant-agree-about-chernobyls-impact-wildlife

[-] cqst 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It having an inconclusive effect on wildlife, but wildlife clearly being able to survive in the region, doesn't really detract from what I originally thought.

From the article you linked:

"No matter what the consequences of lingering radiation might be, there were massive benefits to people leaving."

[-] nomous@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah I think we both agree that nuclear is worth pursuing, it's not 100% safe but nothing is; even windmills catch fire or spin apart. It's far safer than fossil fuels.

[-] nomous@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

lol, does this look poisoned to you?

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
1134 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45216 readers
1497 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS