39
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by BlueMonday1984@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

I stopped writing seriously about “AI” a few months ago because I felt that it was more important to promote the critical voices of those doing substantive research in the field.

But also because anybody who hadn’t become a sceptic about LLMs and diffusion models by the end of 2023 was just flat out wilfully ignoring the facts.

The public has for a while now switched to using “AI” as a negative – using the term “artificial” much as you do with “artificial flavouring” or “that smile’s artificial”.

But it seems that the sentiment might be shifting, even among those predisposed to believe in “AI”, at least in part.

Between this, and the rise of "AI-free" as a marketing strategy, the bursting of the AI bubble seems quite close.

Another solid piece from Bjarnason.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

i just want to note that the same hyper-pro-AI consulting company from that article extruded an article about AI-generated pharmaceuticals https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/10619179

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
39 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1489 readers
28 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS