608
submitted 6 months ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 6 points 6 months ago

What do you propose Google do instead? Run YouTube at a loss?

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 34 points 6 months ago

First, individually targeted advertisement should be illegal. Instead of trying to figure out who I am and serving me ads based on that, they should only be able to look at server side facts. What is the video? This is how television and radio ads have worked for ages. You have a video about SomePopBand, you advertise concert tickets. You have a video about bikes, you advertise bike stuff. You don't know who I am. Suddenly, the motivation for most of the privacy invading, stalking, nonsense is gutted.

Some people would still block those static ads. If they showed some restraint, I think more people would accept them. But that's a sad joke- no profit driven org is going to show restraint.

Secondly, if they can't ethically run the business at a profit, the business probably doesn't deserve to exist. That or it's a loss leader to get people into the ecosystem.

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 3 points 6 months ago

You do know you can enter into your Google settings and disable all tracking and targeting, right? And you can ask them to delete all information they already hold on you.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 23 points 6 months ago

Yes. However, it's an assumption they honor those requests and don't try to track you anyway.

Plus Google isn't the only company trying to do individualized targeted advertising.

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 1 points 6 months ago

Agreed you have to trust them. However, I suspect GDPR punishments keep them to their word.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Google is operating at a 24% net profit margin. They don't need to get their shareholders more money...

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 3 points 6 months ago

Do you actually understand how this works? It’s a beautiful statement and oh so noble, but it just flies against how the world really works.

At some point, maybe not today, but at some point, you’re going to be saving up for your retirement. Your money will be invested; either passively or actively. If active, a fund manager (or maybe even yourself) will be spending time, every single day, wondering how to maximise the invested cash. If passive, you’re letting a WHOLE lot of fund managers make the decisions for you (wisdom of the crowd). Either way, Google better fucking perform or the investors will go elsewhere.

And you’ll be an investor too, asking for Google to do better than anyone else or you’ll take your savings elsewhere.

[-] bravesirrbn@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

One thing I genuinely don't get: why does a company making this much money need "investors"? (Other than participating in the make-rich-people-richer scheme)

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 6 points 6 months ago

Once you’ve gone public, unless some entity could do an offer to take you private, you have investors (aka owners).

To take Google private would be in the region of 2.5 trillion dollars. Even the Norwegian oil fund would struggle to do that.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Because they own the company

[-] uriel238 4 points 6 months ago

Millennials and zoomers are not saving up for retirement, barely able to sustain themselves. They're also expecting ecological collapse to cause global famine or their own nation to go full Reich, assuming they're not killed by hurricanes, wildfire or war.

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Agreed, many young people can’t save. That’s why I said “maybe not today, but at some point”. I’m not saying it’s easy for young people, I’m trying to explain why companies seek to increase profitability and that almost every investor is self-centred.

[-] shani66@ani.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You aren't an investor if you are planning to resell. Day trading and real investment are totally at odds. It's far better (for retirement) to invest in a stable company and get a set return over time for it. We also don't even need to do that for retirement, the fact that we do is fucking insane.

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 3 points 6 months ago

You’re arguing against the world that is. I’m just trying to explain the behaviour, not necessarily condone it.

A pension fund manager may not move in and out of stocks on a daily basis, but at some point they’re going to take a look at how their portfolio is doing and react.

[-] Brutticus@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago

Youtube doesn't pay attention to what ads get approved, or where they get served. Ive heard stories of people getting served two hours full amateur movies as ads, Ive heard of people getting soft core porn served as an ad, to actual scams and crypto pitches. It's like Facebooks new AI enabled algorithm. There is actual danger, considering children and the elderly get sucked in to youtubes black hole?

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

I watched a couple videos on the Diddy case, and a couple days later my whole feed was filled with the worst conspiracy theories and Christian preachers.

I watch one Youtuber talking about pyramids, YouTube fills my whole suggestions with ancient alien conspiracies.

I watched one cover of a song, I get recommended the same song for weeks.

I watch one reaction video, the whole feed turns into reaction videos within minutes.

It's a fight against the algorhytm and it isn't fun. It's incredible how dumb it is after all these years, and those algprhythms are partly to blame that everyone feels more miserable than they are.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

I just turn off recommendations (disable watch history) and use a third party app where I can disable recommendations (Grayjay and NewPipe). I just want my subscriptions and search, that's all.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

https://unhook.app/

Also let's you block certain elements

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Why Download a 3rd party app if the mobile browser works the same?

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

But it doesn't... Here are some features I like about Grayjay/NewPipe:

  • adjust volume/brightness by sliding finger on screen
  • download videos to watch offline
  • watch videos from other sources (less of an issue in a browser)
  • picture in picture
[-] vxx@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So, what's the difference to Firefox with some add ons then?

That someone else gets my login data and view data to sell?

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

I don't login. Grayjay/NewPipe doesn't send any data to its servers, so they're not tracking viewed content. I also get subscriptions and playlists (again, w/o Youtube account) in addition to the features I mentioned. Afaik, you can't get any of that with addons.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

How do they make money then? Nothing is free, and usually when it sounds too good, it is.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Grayjay sells licenses for the app ($10), which doesn't provide any benefits other than helping support the project.

[-] Barowinger@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago

Make a fair payment model. No classic subscription. But pay per watched minute, and when you hit a certain amount of minutes, every additional minute is free.

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

It's too late now, but only if they didn't put so many ads in the first place, less people would be blocking them. They could also make YouTube premium affordable by removing all the features except "no ads".

Some time ago I would've bought YouTube premium, but it had so many features I didn't want driving up the price that I just didn't. I instead switched to Firefox and ads were gone again. Good job google, drove me off YouTube premium and Google chrome at the same time.

[-] uriel238 8 points 6 months ago

Yes. Google bought YouTube. Alphabet is worth $2 trillion. The social control and data mining is value to Google enough.

[-] RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

I mean, yeah. It did so for years.

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 3 points 6 months ago

Yes right. But what does the investor environment look like today? Profit, not users, is what everyone is counting. If Google says “we’re burning cash in all businesses but search, but hey we’re nice”, investors will take their investments to more profitable businesses.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

Let me buy an API token anonymously, similar to how Mullvad works. I'm happy to pay for what I watch, but I don't want to be tracked at all, and I don't trust their internal settings.

Until that's a thing, I'll watch without an account using an ad-blocker. Give me that experience with the apps I use (Grayjay and NewPipe), and I'll pay.

[-] shani66@ani.social 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They could use their monopolies to force advertisers to pay a fair amount for a decent ad instead of taking pennies to ruin the Internet. I never even considered using an ad blocker back when it was just banner ads. Or maybe they could stop being a full decade behind the times and add donations to YouTubers for a cut. If they add value to premium instead of trying to remove value from the base experience they could even triple dip on these ideas.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
608 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59993 readers
1911 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS