559
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

President Joe Biden promised Black voters Wednesday that he would appoint progressives to the US Supreme Court if elected to a second term, suggesting he expects vacancies on the high court over the next four years.

“The next president, they’re going to be able to appoint a couple justices, and I’ll be damned — if in fact we’re able to change some of the justices when they retire and put in really progressive judges like we’ve always had, tell me that won’t change your life,” he said during a campaign rally in Philadelphia.

It was as explicit a warning as Biden could offer about the stakes of the upcoming election, and a clear reminder that some of the nine justices have entered their seventies.

Clarence Thomas is 75 and Samuel Alito is 74; both are conservative and appointed by Republican presidents. Sonia Sotomayor, a liberal who was nominated by President Barack Obama, turns 70 next month.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Hijacking this comment thread to promote Ranked Choice Voting.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

And theres only one party that has outlawed RCV in certain areas. We aren't getting RCV without 2 things:

-Primary moderates and elect progressive Democrats at every level we can -A Democratic supermajority in Congress

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Not sure what you mean by outlaw, but there are definitely democratic politicians who have shot down RCV on their ballots.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

S Dakota, Idaho, Montana, Tennessee, and Florida have all banned RCV. Bunch of other GOP controlled statehouses have proposed bills to do the same.

I'm sure there are individual legislators in the Democratic party that have shot down RCV but its opposition is nowhere near that of the GOP.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Got it. Yeah nobody in power wants RCV. Don’t be fooled by their inaction.

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

BillyWitchDoctor.com more comfortable... with chicken

ARISE! ARISE CHICKEN!

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Shh... He is legend...

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

RCV, Approval, and STAR my beloved

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

STAR, score, or approval! Not sure why people are obsessed with ranked, they must love curing ballots and being prevented from tallying districts individually?

100% would rather have ranked over FPTP, just to be clear. FPTP is toxic garbage.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Not sure why people are obsessed with ranked, they must love curing ballots and being prevented from tallying districts individually?

No need to be hostile to them. RCV is pedalled very hard, so naturally people who've heard about alternative voting systems will know it first.

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

Is there good videos on STAR or score like there is ranked or approval? I first heard about alternative voting systems from that one stick figure YouTube guy. Not sure if he's made any other election based videos I've missed or if other people have made equally good ones about other voting systems.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I don't know if they'll be as entertaining as a pro YouTuber but there is a webpage with some explainer videos https://www.starvoting.org/videos

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago
[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Because those still encourage strategic voting. With RCV, you can vote your conscious and be certain that it won't backfire and help your enemies.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I'd rather a voting system maximize voter satisfaction than minimize strategic voting. And I'd rather have people exhaust their ballots intentionally than accidentally.

What are STAR voters going to do, give everyone either all or no points? Their votes might not be counted in the final round, that's their choice.

[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Being forced to vote strategically is why so many voters are dissatisfied.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I mean, you can look at the mathematical simulations of the models or you can argue over the semantics. STAR discourages voting strategically somewhat by having two stages. If that is not enough, even voting purely strategically it has higher voter satisfaction than ranked.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 5 months ago

I remain highly skeptical if the idea that many people would engage in strategic voting unless it's extremely obvious how to do it.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

Boo RCV - we should just go parliamentary and stop direct election of the executive branch!

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

We'd need a constitutional convention. Or the largest amendment we've ever had. RCV can be done simply by the states.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Yea, if RCV is all we can get I'm not going to let the perfect be the enemy of the good... and hopefully with RCV we could get better leadership... but it'd be wonderful if we could get off direct executive elections.

[-] logi@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Perhaps with RCV (or whatever) you can elect leadership that will allow that.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

Because that's been going so great for the UK...

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

The UK has shitty FPTP like we have here but their government never deadlocks. The US government can fail in a very special way where the president can be reduced to only being able to veto legislation while trying not to be impeached and it's fucking dumb.

We need a government that's both representative and functional and there's a reason why modern nations have looked at directly elected executives and parliamentary system and vastly preferred the latter.

this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
559 points (100.0% liked)

News

23376 readers
1797 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS