1596
  • Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, does not believe in cryptocurrencies, calling them a vehicle for scams and a Ponzi scheme.
  • Torvalds was once rumored to be Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, but he clarified it was a joke and denied owning a Bitcoin fortune.
  • Torvalds also dismissed the idea of technological singularity as a bedtime story for children, saying continuous exponential growth does not make sense.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] huginn@feddit.it 28 points 6 months ago

he doesn’t cheat on his wife

he doesn't cheat on his wife so far.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

Well, we all know he beats his wife......

...................in monopoly! Give me those brown properties!!!

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Why's it gotta be the brown properties?

[-] Mercury@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

The man loves going to brown town, what's wrong with that?

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

They're the cheapest to aquire, put hotels on, and they're right at the start of the board. If you overshoot go, you're PAYING $250 instead of recieving $200 if you land on baltic. And you, as the owner of the brown properties would either get $250 or $450 everytime.

All for just $610 to buy both, and upgrade them both to hotels.

[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Statistically, the best properties to have are the ones just after jail. Everyone who passes go still has to pass them, while those who get sent to jail also have I pass them. The organge properties are the best, because the average dice roll is 7 and from jail that lands you right on them.

[-] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 2 points 6 months ago

He’ll live long enough to end up on the wrong side of the polygamy rights fight. But I’d like to be surprised.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 6 months ago

I imagine he will be an old and gray man and someone will ask him his opinion and it will probably be like

What? Are you fucking with me? I didn't give a shit what people did behind closed doors 40 years ago, what fuckin made you think I would care now? Are you fucking mental? Did your daddy not love you enough? Get the fuck out of here, your making my blood pressure spike....

[-] VerticaGG 11 points 6 months ago

Polygamy: Mormons, etc. generally opposes womens rights.

Polyamory: Ideally places noone above another, elevates everyone to have the healthy connections such that noone is a "3rd wheel" or more disposable. Less about "polycules" recruiting new members, and more about individuals pairing with new partners, and existing partners (initially at least) gaining a metaphor. Mileage may vary and the point is everyone's needs are a bit different and shouldnt feel pressured to fit neatly into a nuclear box.

Just fyi.

[-] huginn@feddit.it 9 points 6 months ago

Polyamory isn't cheating though.

Cheating is, by definition, sex with another person against your partner's will.

[-] rooroo@feddit.de 4 points 6 months ago

The fuck is that even supposed to mean

[-] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Five guys and five gals will be arguing they have a right to share DNA amongst each other and make a single kid, giving them all parental rights. Religious right will have their scheduled stroke. Most of the population won’t care. Internet trolls will be screaming how it’s a United Nations plan to depopulate the planet.

Or basically any legal recognition for polygamy.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Five guys and five gals will be arguing they have a right to share DNA amongst each other and make a single kid

…Is that even possible? I thought humans could only have exactly two parents biologically? If I didn’t misunderstand, I’m legit curious about this.

[-] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 1 points 6 months ago

We’ve already reached two lesbians with their combined dna being carried by a surrogate (which has extra dna effects as the carrier). With further dna advancements it should be possible to mix up multiple parents dna.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Is it this one? I’m far from an expert but it seems like they used a different part of DNA from each woman, I doubt it’s possible to go beyond 3 parents with the same method.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Healthy relationships have ridiculous hall-passes that share at least one person in common.

[-] huginn@feddit.it 1 points 6 months ago

It's not cheating if it's consensual.

this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
1596 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59598 readers
2681 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS