714
near zero (mander.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 70 points 5 months ago

A mathematician, a physicist and an engineer are led into a long room. At the other end stands a beautiful naked woman. "When I ring this bell," she says" you may cross half the space between us. When I ring the bell again, you may again cross half the space between us." Both the mathematician and physicist groan and wander off. "Ah, it's Zeno's paradox, we can never actually reach her." The engineer, waiting for the bell, says "I think I can get close enough."

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 5 months ago
[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 36 points 5 months ago
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

i still don't see what the point is.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago

Because a sexual relationship requires 2 people to touch, so it is a relatable setup.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

yeah but like, you don't need to specify that one individual is naked. If that's a required factoid of the statement, the engineer, mathematician, and physicist should also be naked. But there's no mention of that.

Now i don't have much experience in relationships, particularly inter personal ones, but to my knowledge, you are generally clothed most of the time.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

You are overthinking it. This is just a premise to setup the joke that an engineer deals with approximation while the other two give up because they'll never reach 0.

It could be a bowl of ice cream for all that matters, but people like corny jokes, so that's it.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

no i understood that part. Unless the naked woman has something to do with that part of the joke itself, then i don't know why it's mentioned.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago

Were you neutered as a child?

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago

no i just don't fucking understand why the naked woman matters here.

Could be fucking anything, a pile of a billion dollars. Three turtles, or a goat, it's the same joke.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 months ago

I don't think it's the same joke when it's three turtles or a goat, because the joke is "I think I can get close enough...to engage in unspecified sex acts with this woman."

You think the same chemicals that turned the frickin frogs gay is responsible for this aversion to sexual thoughts? "Could it not be a naked woman? That clutches my pearls."

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

“I think I can get close enough…to engage in unspecified sex acts with this woman.”

that's what i would assume, but then again it never states anything, so this is like walking into a fucking storage shed and seeing a colonoscopy going on. It's just fucking weird.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago

You objection is noted Mr. Spock. Man your station, please.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

also, if the woman is naked, does that mean the mathematician, engineer, and physicist are also naked? Because that would make a lot more sense.

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

The mathematician is naked, something about pure and direct truth. The physicist is wearing a bow tie, chippendale cuffs and a banana hammock. The engineer has on his new invention: Assful chaps.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

i like this interpretation of it.

[-] RoosterBoy@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

Exactly, it's the same joke regardless so why get bent out of shape over it?

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 months ago

i mean yeah, i guess so, but that's not what im confused over.

I just want to know why specifically it was written with a nude woman? It never alluded to anything in particular.

[-] Rev3rze@feddit.nl 12 points 5 months ago

Is it really that confusing? If it had said there was a pot of gold the implication is clear that the person who reaches it will be rich. You ask "why a nude woman?" and the answer is simply because, just like being rich, desiring a sexual partner is a common desire.

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

A pot of gold explaining the rules to you about it ringing a bell would definitely be even more suspicious than a random naked woman.

[-] Rev3rze@feddit.nl 2 points 5 months ago

It's a pot of gold. Obviously there's a leprechaun involved who will be presenting the riddle.

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

Makes sense. But that would not make me less suspicious.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago

i would definitely be more suspicious of it. This is probably another paradox frankly.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

i think it would make equally as much sense, if not more, if the word naked was just removed.

It's just fucking shoehorned into it.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I thought it implied an erection.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

that could be it.

[-] LinyosT@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

Could be fucking anything

Like a naked woman.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

i mean yeah, that's one of the options. Could also be an orphan source.

[-] 0x10097110@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago

The engineer will never reach her, but his boner will.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

im pretty sure most people have arms. An engineer almost certainly does.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Because humanity has no other desires between math and tits apparently.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago

Can confirm.

(I'm both a mathematician and a pervert)

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

and yelling at people who don't understand, apparently.

I've committed the most heinous of crimes according to the internet, not understanding the joke. ~~Sorry i'm autistic lmao.~~

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago

Only straight men are mathematicians, physicists and engineers. This is why the joke is framed this way.

See: responses from OP, valiantly defending his choice to "piss people off", instead of noticing the joke is just yet another reminder that men are default.

After all, sexism is over, and STEM isn't hostile to women/non-heteronormative people. It's all in our head.

[-] Halosheep@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago
[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yay we got instance racism in lemmy!

[-] Halosheep@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago

When they can learn to behave themselves and stop giving the dumbest takes in every discussion, they can have my respect back.

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I know, he wrote a shit comment. But yea most people took random instances

[-] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Hi there friend, I am here to inform you that many woman also like the titty. Gay girls exist my friend, and the gender of the three professionals is never specified.

I'll assume ya ain't trying to be homophobic my buddy but I hope you keep that in mind for future refference.

Edit racism comment was another guy, sorry, very tired

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

I’m not going to spend much time engaging with your comment because you didn’t read mine well.

I did not mention race.

I included mention of gay folks (see non-heteronormative). The “joke” doesn’t work unless the stem major desires being very close to a naked woman, so I don’t find your mention of gay men to make sense.

[-] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

You did a racism. You did an imperialism. You did a nationalism. You did a xenophobia. You did a white fragility. You did a weak apology. You did no growth. This makes it abundantly clear you don't understand the intersectional nature of the multiplicity of your offenses

/s

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

that's the vibe i'm getting, but it's a really fucking weird premise for a hypothetical regardless.

"there are a fisher, a farmer, and a welder in a bar, on the other side is cthulhu" is basically how it's worded

this post was submitted on 18 May 2024
714 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

10652 readers
3194 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS