639

submitted 7 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

172 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 7 months ago

so your process of getting legal advice is:

ask chatgpt, which will output convincing blob of text, with references and sources that might or might be not real, relevant, or make sense, some of which you won't be able to judge
then, ask a real lawyer about this, which means that they have to make sense of the situation on their own but also dig through machine generated drivel, which means that they need more time for that, and this means extra cost/wasted effort

how does that simplify anything

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 18 points 7 months ago

Look it’s a really cheap and fast way of going from potential lawsuit to actual damages! That’s progress, that is!

[ed note: since I can’t markup-joke it in a way that survives lemmy: to be read in pratchett voice)

this post was submitted on 15 May 2024

639 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1489 readers

30 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS