639
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] V0ldek@awful.systems 19 points 7 months ago

I'm not sure what you even mean by "how is it different", but for starters a human can actually get a good mark at the bar and spicy autocomplete clearly cannot.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

spicy autocomplete clearly cannot.

What you are basing this "it clearly cannot" on? Because an early iteration of it was mediocre at it? The first ICE cars were slower than horses, I'm afraid this statement may be the equivalent of someone pointing at that and saying "cars can't get good at going fast."

But I specifically asked "in this regard", referring to taking a test after previously having trained yourself on the data.

[-] V0ldek@awful.systems 19 points 7 months ago

What you are basing this “it clearly cannot” on?

I asked Gemini and it told me that ChatGPT can't do shit, I'm not gonna question it.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

So, it's either perfect right now, or never capable of anything. Great critical and nuanced thinking.

[-] V0ldek@awful.systems 17 points 7 months ago
[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 11 points 7 months ago

do you see why I take the shortcut?

this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
639 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1497 readers
51 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS