1363
submitted 1 year ago by UhBell@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

I’m not on either side of the argument, but would guess a good argument would be that fish need to eat other fish in order to survive as it’s their only source of food. We don’t. Provenly.

[-] Indie@lemmy.fmhy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

What's wrong with fish eating plastics we dump in the waters. Are they anti plastic or something?????

/S

[-] lunaticneko@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

That's right! Oil spill is full of calories! Why don't they just slurp it up so they can contain a lot of fish oil!

[-] nxfsi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

A person does not need to eat meat.

People absolutely do need to eat meat, specifically cooked meat in order to be intelligent. It's what made cavemen smarter than other animals. Also the recent rise in average height and IQ from good nutrition is in part directly related to cheap meat from factory farming.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

We needed to eat meat to get to this point. We can stop now.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Except in most cases we can't. You may be able to, in which case, good job, but meat is much cheaper per quantity and quality of nutrients, not to mention people like me, whose only real source of dietary iron is meat.

[-] Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Iron is just a mineral, where do you think the cows get it? Plenty of plants have iron. Meat is also typically a lot more expensive than rice and beans. Like you want to eat meat, that's cool, just stop acting like it's for your health when meat is literally a carcinogen.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Nails have iron, try eating one of those! The air is mostly Nitrogen, why do plants even need N2 in the soil?

It's basic fucking science that nutrients take different forms which can be absorbed differently.

[-] Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Again: where do you think the cows get it, lol. Not from nails.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Unless you're a hunter there's no way meat is cheaper, wtf are you talking about?

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

1kg of chicken breast meat costs me less than 5 USD and covers multiple days of meals. To get equivalent nutrients out of plants would cost me way more than that.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

wtf you can? Where I am chicken breast is USD $11.64 per kg!

Compare that to beans. Where I live I can get a kg of dried pinto beans for $3.50, and with 67% as much protein per serving as chicken it would cost $5.25 to get the same amount of protein as a kg of chicken breast.

What's the price of 1kg of dried beans where you live? That'd be a more apt comparison.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Depends a lot on brand and quality, but I'd guess the average is somewhat close to yours, at $3.00 US. Beans are a major source of protein for most people, where I live. Doesn't help me, though - I don't much mind the flavor, but they make me incredibly nauseous.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Beans are just about the best source of plant protein, yeah. Grains and nuts have protein too, but nuts are definitely pricier and grains have pretty bad carb/protein ratios. If you can't eat beans for whatever reason it'd be a serious commitment to be vegan! No shame in that.

As an aside, I actually have nothing against eating bugs like crickets and mealworms etc. It makes me a bad vegan but I don't really care about whether or not bugs have feelings lol

[-] Clompsh@mander.xyz 7 points 1 year ago
[-] nxfsi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

PBS video

Not exactly a scientific paper, but I guess it should be a good enough source for lemmy

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So you think our need to COOK meat is the same as needing to EAT meat?

My god. I don’t think there’s much help for you.

[-] Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

The video says it was cooking, not cooked meat, and even says homo erectus mostly ate plants.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Uhhh... no. It's not good enough for lemmy.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You are absolutely 100% wrong on this. And so wrong that it’s hilarious. Please don’t reproduce.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Nice argument, you sure showed him! Oh, wait, you didn't - there was no substance to your reply. I suggest actually choosing a point of contention and explaining your perspective next time.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There's no irony, as my point of contention is your inability to discuss things like an adult despite, presumably, being one.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

According to that logic, Inuit people should be able to outsmart all of us - but they don't seem to be smarter or dumber than the rest of the human population.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Access to meat (thus better nutrition) increasing doesn't imply meat makes you Megamind. That's a very poor argument in bad faith.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The minute you start blathering about a "rise in IQ" you are making a "poor argument in bad faith."

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Because? Things don't become truthful just because you said them.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Don't tell me... tell your meat-obsessed friend over there.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Right... let's check his comment point by point, shall we?

A person does not need to eat meat.

I believe you'll agree with this without the need to further explain it.

People absolutely do need to eat meat

This is strictly true, in our current context. The food production chain simply cannot cope with the abrupt loss of a main source of nutrients in most places. Particularly when 'muricans are throwing away up to half of their food.

specifically cooked meat in order to be intelligent.

Non-statement statement of dubious quality. Should be rewritten.

It’s what made cavemen smarter than other animals.

That's invariably the most accepted explanation to homo sapiens evolution

Also the recent rise in average height and IQ from good nutrition is in part directly related to cheap meat from factory farming.

Meat provides very dense nutritional value, I'm sure you'll agree - it's why carnivores exist to begin with. We know, factually, that nutritional quality directly correlates with better health, both in body and mind. We also know that meat can be VERY cheap, as long as you're not looking for "grade A elite baby wagyuu" stuff.

Where, exactly, is your point explicit?

[-] masquenox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That’s invariably the most accepted explanation to homo sapiens evolution

Oh really? Accepted by whom?

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The fucking scientific community? Let me be direct - Are you seriously going to ask ridiculous questions a 5 year old could answer instead of providing any argument whatsoever? Because at that point, I'd rather not waste my time with a functionally illiterate individual.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The fucking scientific community?

Then you should have zero problem providing proper back-up to your claims, shouldn't you?

[-] projectd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, until we evolve to consume light directly, we'll be processing some other organics.

[-] sorata@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Imo harm does not equal to kill. A fish with limited imagination cannot be harmed if his life just ends and he does not feel anything.

Can the same be said about people? How do we judge imagination of a fish? If we don't understand what they feel is it because of their lack of imagination or ours?

[-] debil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Eat yourself then.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
1363 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45729 readers
750 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS