525

Looks like Arrowhead might be moving forward with PSN despite "internal discussions".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 153 points 6 months ago

The accounts are so important that you're willing to lose sales in that many countries?!

[-] yukichigai@kbin.social 107 points 6 months ago

While 177 countries sounds like a lot, it's not where the majority of players are. PSN operates in the top 15 countries by GDP and the top 4 by population.

Of course there's still the question of why they work in so few countries when literally none of their competitors (that I know of) have those limitations.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 6 months ago

It's because it's a Japanese company. I'm not saying this out of racism but because they're known for being archaic in how they do certain things. Like game modding and work schedules. Their public transit is top fucking notch though.

[-] Renegade_roosteR@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

I think the mistake was ever thinking that one company is "good" while the other is "bad". Companies are just different flavors of bad once they grow above a size of, well, once they are companies.

[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Only because we didn't know better when we were kids.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Their public transit is top fucking notch though.

I've been to Japan a few times. Only Tokyo is super accurate with time. Go to any other Japanese city and it's no different from any other city in the world. Late trains. Buses that are 10 mins late or not even showing.

Can we kill this narrative that Japan is hyper efficient with public transportation?

[-] 100@fedia.io 34 points 6 months ago

some huge countries on that list, philippines, pakistan, nigeria, egypt

pretty embarassing

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia too. Not exactly developing countries.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 9 points 6 months ago

They are also EU countries. I am not even sure it's perfectly legal to sell stuff in the EU and not sell to residents of specific countries.

No harm no foul until somebody makes a report I guess.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

This is accurate. I work at a international company. We will tell a bunch of countries to go fuck themselves since combined, they make like 1% of sales.

I'm not saying it's right or wrong. I'm just saying it's a thing many companies do.

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

I have knowledge on mobile gaming, they do this too.

It doesn’t pay to manage some shitty off brand Android phone’s compatibility issues when your whole country spends less in a month than a half dozen midwestern moms in an evening on the game.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

I don't doubt what you're saying, but you have to admit that this is terrible PR for them.

If the past thirty years of Sony history has anything to say... I'm sure they're doing this right now:

[-] vodka@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago

PSN (PlayStation Network) is available in 73 countries.

It was PSNow (PlayStation Now, their game steaming service) that was only in 19 countries. PSNow was merged into PlayStation Plus as the Premium level package, and is in 30 or so countries.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Strange then that they are now only listed in 18 countries.

[-] vodka@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That is definitely strange, but might be an overreaction by Valve and not done by Arrowhead.

Edit: Seems it was indeed done by Valve.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Strange then that they are now only listed in 18 countries.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 11 points 6 months ago

To be fair, the game wasn't supposed to be sold in those countries to begin with. Sony and Valve screwed up the region settings.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 48 points 6 months ago

But it was, so who is going to take responsibility for it? Is Sony going to back down from the requirement? Is Valve going to refund all those users?

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 29 points 6 months ago

Honestly, I think Sony is going to be more stubborn than Valve. I saw in another thread where some people were getting approved for their Steam refunds even after passing the 2-hour refund window, so it looks like Valve may already be the first to cave.

Sony's probably going to continue digging their heels in, though.

[-] Daveyborn@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Can confirm, saw one approved refund with 97 hours on the clock.

[-] NekkoDroid@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Sometimes (almost always) I wish that the refunded money wouldn't come out of Steams/Valves pocket...

[-] MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

From what I've heard Valve is already refunding most everyone who asks for a refund given this controversy.

this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
525 points (100.0% liked)

Games

32571 readers
1380 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS