146
submitted 6 months ago by Zotora@programming.dev to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 47 points 6 months ago

"protective DNS"

There is no way there isn't a hidden agenda. You already could block malicious websites at the browser level

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Doing so at the dns layer is a much better option, as it prevents the end user or malware from bypassing those restrictions with a non-standard browser or modifying the client settings (which shouldn't happen, but can).

In an enterprise environment, which is exactly what this is aimed at, that kind of protection is a boon against the random shit end users click on.

[-] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

Not all connections are at the browser level.

this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
146 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31939 readers
895 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS