1123
Second Boeing whistleblower dies in less than two months
(www.newshub.co.nz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
1123 points (100.0% liked)
News
23281 readers
3448 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
That's ludicrous. You show me one poll that agrees with you.
You are supposed to vote for the best nominee not according to made up poll
Maybe you throw your vote away on someone who has zero chance of winning, but that's not how I vote.
Votes aren't like your bigmac, you can't throw them away
You absolutely can. By voting for someone who has no chance of winning. It's purely a thing to make you feel good about yourself. And no one will know either. You could claim you voted for Cornel West but actually vote for Trump and no one will be able to say you were lying.
I'm never going to get what I want, so I vote pragmatically. And stopping the guy who literally says he's going to be a dictator seems like a pretty fucking important thing to do.
Children in gaza and in the middle east will be the judges of your vote
How many Palestinian children's lives will voting for a candidate that will definitely lose save?
Not supporting these fueling the genocide could indeed save lives.
You didn't answer my question.
You sound brainwashed, i presume that by "candidate that will definitely lose" you mean someone that isn't strictly part of the red and blue party. In this case not supporting any of these and voting for someone else could indeed save lives.
This goes back to my original question- which candidate other than Trump or Biden has a chance of winning? You certainly haven't named them.
Any candidate has the same chances of winning otherwise the election would be rigged
No. That is not how elections have ever worked. It has never been that every candidate has an equal chance of winning. Not in ancient Athens and not today in the U.S.
There's a reason why polling is done.
polls can be rigged
Irrelevant to my point, which I think you know.