660

we fell for the corporate propoganda rule (lemmy.cafe)

submitted 6 months ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196

68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 222 points 6 months ago

Any tool that calls itself “open source” and uses proprietary encryption that they refuse to let any neutral third party review, should absolutely not be trusted.

[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 137 points 6 months ago

It's open standard, not open source

[-] itslilith 54 points 6 months ago

but we need to trust them that the standard is actually implemented

[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 46 points 6 months ago

Yep. Which is why FOSS development and support of FOSS developers is so important

[-] ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol 27 points 6 months ago

The definition of words are indeed, critical 👍

[-] cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 6 months ago

Too many people misunderstand open source and free to use.

[-] fossphi@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

So can I write my own implementation and talk to other people via rcs? If not, then I don't think it deserves being called an open standard

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Wonder if maybe there could be some organization that could fill that need. Independent, or a collection of industry vets, who look through the code and say if it’s safe or not. With the assumption details won’t be leaked or something to protect anything actually proprietary?