106
submitted 6 months ago by zea_64 to c/libertyhub

https://xkcd.com/661/

I've seen many people take absolutists stances and throw accusations or insults at others who don't. While I applaud that they recognized serious problems, I want everyone to understand why I might take actions that seem to ignore or even worsen those problems: I only have so much power and so many options, none of which are ideal, so I do the best I can with what I have. I might prioritize stopping one bad thing over stopping another; that's not me excusing the other bad thing, that's me playing the cards I have to get the least bad outcome.

Personally, I base my moral decisions on expected outcomes. I would pull the lever in the trolley problem. I understand some people think me a monster for that, and I certainly wouldn't feel good pulling it, but I see it as me net saving people. I disagree with people that wouldn't pull it, but I see where they're coming from and I'm not mad at them (disappointed, maybe). Of course, as well as pulling the lever, there may be options to try helping the one person on the tracks, and we should definitely attempt such a rescue.

This whole topic can be applied to the do-i-vote-for-biden thing that this community seems divided over, but it's much more broadly applicable too.

Anyway, this is just me saying that I don't think the absolutist all-or-nothing approach some people take is a good idea, and I also don't like when some of them call me a bad person for not doing the same.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Wahots@pawb.social 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I agree. Onion article (below) about this made me laugh but also gives an aftertaste of dread if people stay home, and we end up with a dictator for a day who overstays his welcome by a decade or two.

Pick and choose your battles, but don't be a single issue voter or you bone everyone- left and right. A lot of rural communities depend on the social safetynet programs that urban places put in place, even if the rural places tend to try and curtail them. This election will be one of the most important since the civil war; We get to decide whether or not we still want the privilege of being a republic.

American 18-year-olds stoked to vote in last presidential election - The Beaverton https://www.thebeaverton.com/2024/04/american-18-year-olds-stoked-to-vote-in-last-presidential-election/

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav 5 points 6 months ago

the privilege of being a republic

Let's take care not to glorify our "democracy" in the process though. "You have no choice except to vote for this genocidal bigot, or our 'republic' will die" isn't exactly a system that should be praised.

Declaring one's reasons for voting for Biden is acceptable here, but defending an oppressive state that by design causes widespread suffering and death is not.

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
106 points (100.0% liked)

Liberty Hub

288 readers
1 users here now

  1. No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
  2. No defending oppressive systems or organizations
  3. No uncivil or rude comments to other users
  4. Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
  5. No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.

These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS