111

Amazing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mii@awful.systems 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I used to believe public institutions like the WHO wouldn't jump onto any stupid bandwagon, but here we are.

But at least they acknowledge it's all bullshit on their own website, lol.

WHO takes no responsibility for any conversation content created by Generative AI. Furthermore, the conversation content created by Generative AI in no way represents or comprises the views or beliefs of WHO, and WHO does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of any conversation content. Please check the WHO website for the most accurate information. By using WHO Sarah, you understand and agree that you should not rely on the answers generated as the sole source of truth or factual information, or as a substitute for professional advice.

[-] yellowcake@awful.systems 35 points 7 months ago

I hate this cop out everyone uses when they stuff AI into their system. “By using it it’s actually your fault for believing the information” while also making it the preferred or even only way to try and get information. This is unethical especially in healthcare

[-] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 15 points 7 months ago

Just washing their hands of consequences

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 7 months ago

So they basically acknowledge it is useless. Cool. What progress.

this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
111 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

989 readers
1 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS