319
submitted 1 year ago by TaviRider@reddthat.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

The legal situation is more complex and nuanced than the headline implies, so the article is worth reading. This adds another ruling to the confusing case history regarding forced biometric unlocking.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nobody cares. It's easy. Folks aren't out getting arrested in mass, even in the United States. Unless youre out selling drugs or protesting while breaking shit it has no functional effect on your life in any way.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, yes, if you've done nothing wrong argument.

I still care whether government is being properly restrained in applying it's power against any individual citizen, because that citizen represents all of us.

Innocent until proven guilty, and all that

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don't care. I'm just saying the why.

TBH privacy advocates have largely put themselves into the position of the window ME UAC prompt. They are deaf to it and IMO it's a large part of the privacy community treating everything like an 11 and refusal to look towards a user friendly threat model.

this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
319 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

37279 readers
971 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS