473
submitted 1 year ago by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

An Israeli missile has hit Iran, two US officials have told the BBC's US partner CBS News.

Iranian state media is reporting that flights have been suspended over several cities, according to Associated Press.

Iran has been on high alert after Israel said it would respond to an Iranian attack against it on Saturday night

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

"Race" has no biological definition. Star Wars fans can be a race if you want them to.

[-] ToastedPlanet 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Typically when people are saying Jews are a race, they referring to the idea that Jews are not White, as in they cannot be White. Jews can be White, but they can also be Black, Native American or Hispanic. Jews are not in a racial category that excludes them from being part of these groups. That's what I was referring to when I wrote race.

That's not really the main point, I was agreeing with the person I responding to and adding some clarification. It seemed to have distracted from the issue at hand.

Killing people isn't how we stop the spread of fascism in the modern day. We need to spread information, for example, that fascism is a self-destructive ideology that will destroy hundreds of millions of lives and that the Republican Party is controlled by fascists. I think most people know that on lemmy, but there are plenty of people who will check into politics in the months leading up to the election and form their opinions then. A misconception I see on lemmy is that some people assume we can defeat fascism with guns alone. That isn't going to cut it. We have to reach more people with true information before fascists reach them with misinformation. Once a person forms an opinion they are unlikely to discard that opinion when presented with new information in the short term. That short term can easily last until the election, so these months leading up to the election are crucial. edit: capitalization

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Race is a well documented biological fact actually. It's not subject to political interpretation.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737365/

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

By Alan Templeton.

According to Templeton's research, perceived differences in races are more related to cultural perceptions and biases than any underlying genetic reality.[5] For example, Templeton's statistical analysis of the human genome shows that much greater genetic diversity exists between populations of chimpanzees than humans from different parts of the world.[3]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Templeton

Do you think maybe you're misunderstanding him?

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It think it's debatable about how you define Races, but it's also quite obvious that biological races exist. There are specific differences in the physical biology that separate the races, and common traits among them that identify them as part of the group. Skin color, hair type, bone structure, genetic predisposition to certain diseases, etc. Physical traits are passed from the parents to the children, and when the parents are of different races we get blending of the characteristics and so on. Some Native Americans even have different kinds of teeth than European-Caucasian descended folks do.

Basically it's not something you can choose or change, it's an immutable biological set of characteristics. I don't know what "race" the Jews in Israel are exactly but I suspect it depends a lot on the region their ancestors are from. Many of them might even be the same "race" as Palestinians.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

What's the race here, African or Melanesian? And if it's the same race, why are they so separated geographically?

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know, just some mixture of African and Mongolian would be my guess. It would be more appropriate to ask the people in that picture IMO.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You'd be 100% wrong there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanesians

Maybe you're wrong on race as well.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So what? I said I don't know already. Do you want to keep on all day about this?

Go ahead and just believe whatever you want about all this, you will do that regardless of what I say.

Likewise there's nothing you can say that would change the facts of reality that I've already stated.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You said physical traits determined race. You couldn't determine race from physical traits.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You want to reduce everything into simple concepts just to argue about them. Reality is not that simple, and that's clearly not all that I said about the subject. There's no need to make up your own version of "what I said" when what I actually said is still there in plain text to read in the past comments.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm not making anything up:

It think it’s debatable about how you define Races, but it’s also quite obvious that biological races exist. There are specific differences in the physical biology that separate the races, and common traits among them that identify them as part of the group. Skin color, hair type, bone structure, genetic predisposition to certain diseases, etc. Physical traits are passed from the parents to the children, and when the parents are of different races we get blending of the characteristics and so on. Some Native Americans even have different kinds of teeth than European-Caucasian descended folks do.

So do physical traits determine race or not?

[-] stringere@leminal.space 2 points 1 year ago

the facts of reality that I've already stated

But you never stated facts or reality.

You're trying to argue that races exist as something other than social constructs.

Different Races for humans have no genetic or biological basis. Period.

Blonde is not a race. Brown eyed is not a race. Brown skin is not a race. And on and on

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, and you fundamentally misunderstand biology, genetics, and race.

In essence, per Robert Saplosky, race is a cultural construct, not a genetic or biological one. He has his entire Stanford lecture on human behavior including human genetics on YouTube. He also has several books explaining this. Here's a link to a summary video: https://youtu.be/YVT5iIXdjek?si=jXKvfd3fUEdQcjMx

Just because you can reactively type people into races, doesn't make race a real biological phenomenon. There are plenty of races that look like others, plenty of admixture that ruins your theories. Sickle cell anemia can exist in white people (people who appear to look white) who have black ancestry, but you wouldn't know they have either sickle cell or black ancestry from looking at them. Because race ISNT genetics. There are people within the same family who are different races, one who is lighter and one who is darker, etc. And melanin production is only one small component of the cultural cues we see as someone's race.

Again, it's not biological and no real scientist would think that.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/YVT5iIXdjek?si=jXKvfd3fUEdQcjMx

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

From your source:

Humans have much genetic diversity, but the vast majority of this diversity reflects individual uniqueness and not race.

And

The question of the existence of human “races” now becomes the question of the existence of human subspecies.

... One definition regards races as geographically circumscribed populations within a species that have sharp boundaries that separate them from the remainder of the species (Smith, Chiszar, & Montanucci, 1997).

... A second definition defines races as distinct evolutionary lineages within a species. An evolutionary lineage is a population of organisms characterized by a continuous line of descent such that the individuals in the population at any given time are connected by ancestor/descendent relationships.

And

It is critical to note that genetic differentiation alone is insufficient to define a subspecies or race under either of these definitions of race.

You seem to have linked something that argues and shows the opposite of what you intended there, bud.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Did you miss the whole section with the tree of races, showing the genetic differences in them? Maybe you didn't make it all the way through?

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I think you might have just skimmed it. Throughout the paper the authors include examples of "race trees" which they argue have no places in scientific literature because they do not apply to humans.

I have an idea. Why don't you quote the section that proves your point. If I can't rebut you by copying and pasting context from the same paper, you win. Deal?

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I have another idea, which is that I've said all that I care to say about it already and reject your attempts to continue arguing.

You can just carry on believing whatever it is that you want to believe, as that's what you'd do regardless of whatever I said anyway.

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=23cSs1rvbUQ

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Lmfao, you mean you lost this argument thoroughly and you're too much of a baby to admit you were wrong.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Whatever, you can believe that if it makes you feel good. I'm good either way.

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Edit: oops, I blocked that guy so this comment looked like it was in reply to me, sorry! 😅

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why not pretend breeds of horses don't exist while you're at it?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Breeds are used to refer to domestic animals where artificial selection was used to exemplify specific traits.

Are you saying that the traits of different "races" were artificially selected for? Who was doing the selecting?

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Your definition of breed is poor and self serving

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

But please, do tell me the real definition.

(Note that it says there's no scientific definition of breed either.)

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hey genius, what you posted contradicts what you are saying.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure how you think it contradicts what I'm saying, but I'm waiting for your scientific definition of breed, please.

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's really obvious if you read it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I did read it. It says there's no scientific definition. You said there is. So what is it?

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If it has no scientific definition, it has no scientific definition. The fact that you can't provide one is good evidence. The fact that the thing you are telling me to read says so is much better evidence.

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What part of this did I not read?

Despite the centrality of the idea of "breeds" to animal husbandry and agriculture, no single, scientifically accepted definition of the term exists.[3]: 340  A breed is therefore not an objective or biologically verifiable classification but is instead a term of art amongst groups of breeders who share a consensus around what qualities make some members of a given species members of a nameable subset.

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Apparently the whole thing. Either that or you don't know what it means. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7925393/ you should tell these guys what they study and track don't exist.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Still waiting for that scientific definition of breed. That link doesn't have it and the thing you've told me to read more than once literally says it is a term of art, not scientific.

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You're gonna be waiting a long time unless you start comprehending what you're shown. Like seriously, are you really this oblivious or just playing?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Let's pretend I'm this oblivious. That way you can give me the scientific definition of 'breed.'

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Let's pretend you're not missing the fucking point entirely, and sickle cell anemia isn't only a problem for one race.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You were talking about breed, not race. You claimed breed was a scientific term. Please give the scientific definition.

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did I? Where? Seems to me I said they exist.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Me: “Race” has no biological definition. Star Wars fans can be a race if you want them to.

You: Why not pretend breeds of horses don’t exist while you’re at it?

https://lemmy.world/comment/9511019

So if you didn't mean that breed had a scientific definition, why bring it up when discussing race's scientific definition?

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They track heritable disease frequency by race, which obviously exists scientifically being that. you act like 23 and me doesn't exist. "race doesn't exist" vs "DNA says this was a (whatver race)"

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's not an answer.

I will paste what I wrote again. Please either answer my question or give the scientific definition of breed:

Me: “Race” has no biological definition. Star Wars fans can be a race if you want them to.

You: Why not pretend breeds of horses don’t exist while you’re at it?

https://lemmy.world/comment/9511019

So if you didn’t mean that breed had a scientific definition, why bring it up when discussing race’s scientific definition?

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Your race is insufferable pedantic moron.

this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
473 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48917 readers
1951 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS